When Rome takes a major region, it has a series of choices for government policy. The initial choice is of course a no brainer. But subsequent choices seem more nuanced. Reading the text of the various builds available, some say that direct Roman rule or Roman forces in the region will cause unrest. Should such language be taken literally? If that particular policy is adopted for a region, will it prosper more with no Roman governor? Should it be garrisoned by local levies only?
I have been assuming the latter to be the case, but I haven't yet left a region with no governor.
Syracuse offers choices of total autonomy and semi-autonomy, and I am hesitant to make choices the outcomes of which I do not understand. I trust these different choices are not mere window dressing but result in different outcomes. I looked through the sticky posts about the game changes, and maybe I missed the discussion of Policy choices.
I don't expect someone to tell me what to do (I really wouldn't care much for that) but I would appreciate some guidance of whether to take the text literally, and what possible outcomes can result from the Policy choices.
Thank you in advance for your help.




Reply With Quote








