what do you wanna see in the MTW2?

[Sitarus Originalus PM-30+]

i am not sure if this was already posted, so... here it is.

i would like to see more then 100 cities in new TW game... 100 is hardly enough for Europe... there are many hundrets of cities in Europe worth mentioning in medieval times and considering there will also be ameica included in MTW2 i think about 150 cities is like minimum for a game like that....

also i would like to see AI doing less mistakes and not sending general cavalry into phalanx... AI do it all the time (or at lest too often).

i would like to have more options in diplomacy... also i would like AI wont breat contracts all the time... if we say peace, i would like AI at least not attack me in next 2 turns (and usually he pays me for peace )...

there are even more things i would like to be included in new TW game, but those are one of most disturbing from RTW.

what do you think? you have more wishes? :original:

[Stalins Ghost]

Three wishes:

Competant Battlefield AI: One that uses its armies coherently, and not a rabble of units randomly attacking different targets. AI that uses all of the unit abilities.

Competant Strategic AI: AI that behaves as a nation, both diplomatically and economically.

More available tactics: Withdrawing instead of running for example, or new formations.

[Centurio Marcus]

1 ) Good A.I and all factions should behave their own style. (For example. Turkish not act like England) and use their own diplomacy and battle tactics.

2 )Each city would be unique with it's unique buildings. (Like Notre Dame in Paris and Hagia Sofia in Constantinopole etc.)

3 )In R:TW there were civilians walking in streets of city only when it was not under siege. Now they should run in streets when the city is sieged too. And you could slaughter them while your army is taking the city.

4 ) Each faction should have it's own regular and unique units. So no same archer skin for all factions.

That's all for now.

[Spiff]

A visualy more interesting campaign map, more incidental details are what interest me.. i like to be entertained by little things that make you stop and go wow.. thats pretty cool..

[Shaun]

Well apart from the obvious(better AI), i would like new formations as well. It was annyoin in RTW you couldnt feign a retreat, if you turned your back to run, they would slaughter you and you would rout.

[DougyM]

MTW in the RTW engine.

And as far as im concerned 100 cities is better than 200.

Having 9 in 10 battles being sieges in RTR and other RTW engine based games got boring as hell.

[Lusted]

Well guys they have stated they are improving the battle map, campaign map and diplomatic ai so you shouldn't have to worry about that. And centurio marcus, unless CA have another couple of YEARS they ain't going to be doing every city unique.

[Sitarus Originalus PM-30+]

i would like to see logistic in MTW2... i mean it would be nice if you could transport food, weapons to the troops and you would have to plan it in advance.. that way game would become more realisitc and complicated =) i like complicated =))
also.. i would like to see option that say your troops to fight with anemy, but then act like withdrawing. that would open so many more options for a player to set a trap for anemy army.

[Yosemite]

Real noncheating challanges! \o/

[Hansa]

No hardcoded stuff: e.g.

Ai

Faction Limit

Unit Limit

Diplomacy

And so on...

This way, if Ca screws something up, which undoubtebly they will, the more gifted members of this community can fix it.

[carlisimo]

I just want to see the AI factions kill each other.

When you own half the map, there should not be 20 tiny little factions for you to squash one by one. There should be a few big ones left, at most.

[meltdown]

I would like to see more speeches...like full speeches for all the factions. As for the battles, I would like to see a bigger clash between armies when charging at each other. I never like dhow the units put on the brakes before hitting each other. It would be cool to see men knock or tackle each other down from the charge.

[Tritio]

1) More detail in every aspect of the game.

2) More realism.

3) More Artificial *INTELLIGENCE*.

[Hannibal Barca]

More realistic, better AI, more challanging campaign and a fair auto-resolve regardless of difficulty (lousy VH auto-resolve)

[Spajjder]

I exclude those things I've already know will be there.
I want smartass AI. AI who wants to win, who will do everything in their power to do that on vh/vh.
I want the supertank generals gone and I want archers to be good at something more than killing chariots.

[Turnus]

Greater realism in gameplay, better A.I., greater moddability, historical accuracy (but this can be modded in anyway). Although I'm not sure if any of those functions will make it into the game in any great capacity.

[Sitarus Originalus PM-30+]

I exclude those things I've already know will be there.
I want smartass AI. AI who wants to win, who will do everything in their power to do that on vh/vh.
I want the supertank generals gone and I want archers to be good at something more than killing chariots.

i like what you said... i want an arogant AI also =) Ai that will be really VH when you play on VH =)

[Sephynos]

I wanna see blood!

[DougyM]

I wanna see blood!

Units who engage in battle for prolonged periods get a bloodied and dirty texture.

[Ewan]

Less nudity ( naked fanatics )
I would like to see alot more of the lttle gamplay info that we had in M:tw, i would also like to have less battles and the ones we have are alot larger and last longer.

On a last note, A.I has already been mentioned enough so please dont make a post about something already mentions, means less readin for the rest of us