Multiplayer vs Singleplayer? which do you prefer

[Vercingetorix The Great]

I prefer multiplayer because it is more challenging and you don't have to worry about economics.

[Alexanderos]

Singleplayer - Play alone , have a lot of fun rebuilding an empire.
Multiplayer - Play with your friends , have a lot of fun destroying the noobs with peasants :d

[Primo]

Singleplayer, because of the campaign. The Battles are nice, but they get boring after some time. I like to have an economic challenge.

[Willowran]

Multiplayer: the ai has a set limit on what they can and cannot do, and they always do the same thing. The ai is too easy to exploit, and is not that challenging. Too many loopholes. Thats not to say its not fun, but i prefer the challenge of a live opponent.

[Aymer de Valence]

I've played a few games in multiplayer, won a few too, but the real fun for me lies in singleplayer. I'd say the best thing about Rome's campaign is how the campaign map will reflect the battlefield - two armies clash next to a forest, and on the battlefield you will see that forest. It really adds to the tactical element of the game