UN and it's promotion of sex with 10 year olds

[Cat-astrophic]

Although there is no internationally accepted definition
of adolescence, the United Nations defines adolescents
as individuals aged 10–19 (page 12)

Investing in sexual and reproductive health knowledge and
services for early adolescents is critical (...) importance of making high-quality sexual
and reproductive health services and knowledge available
to adolescent girls and boys alike from an early age. (page 22)

Offering adolescents and young people high-quality reproductive
health services, and ensuring that they have sound knowledge
of sexually transmitted infections, empowers them
in their choices and behaviours. (page 25)

Source: http://www.unicef.org/sowc2011/pdfs/...N_02092011.pdf


So to prevent early sexual problems the UN wants to promote for them "high quality" sexual and reproductive services and choices instead of teaching 10 year olds to behave like the kids they are and enforcing the condemnation of sexual relations of adults to kids in this age?

[PointOfViewGun]

Where the hell does it say UN wants to promote sex?

[Cat-astrophic]

Where the hell does it say UN wants to promote sex?

Instead of correcting the problem by promoting the reduction of sex with young people in society they want to promote sexual services and choices to 10 year olds...

[removeduser_4536284751384]

I always knew there was a UN (and thus NWO) conspiracy to turn propagate pedosexuality.

[PointOfViewGun]

Instead of correcting the problem by promoting the reduction of sex with young people in society they want to promote sexual services and choices to 10 year olds...

No, they don't want to promote that. They want to educate kids on sex and sexually transmitted diseases and make sure they have access to healthcare services in case they need them. They want to promote responsibility. Shocking, right?

[Axeman]

Instead of correcting the problem by promoting the reduction of sex with young people in society they want to promote sexual services and choices to 10 year olds...

How cute you think abstinence works.

[TheDarkKnight]

I think what he is trying to say is that the UN isn't outright condemning sexual relations with people who are clearly too young to do such things, and instead taking a roundabout approach to the issue.


At least that's what I'm getting from this. I could be wrong.

[Sphere]

You know who else offered "adolescents and young people high-quality reproductive
health services"?

Hitler.

[DimeBagHo]

Source: http://www.unicef.org/sowc2011/pdfs/...N_02092011.pdf

So to prevent early sexual problems the UN wants to promote for them "high quality" sexual and reproductive services and choices instead of teaching 10 year olds to behave like the kids they are and enforcing the condemnation of sexual relations of adults to kids in this age?

Those two options are not mutually exclusive. You can provide information and services, and also tell kids to keep their pants on until they get older.

You know who else offered "adolescents and young people high-quality reproductive
health services"?

Hitler.

That was quick.

[Condottiere 40K]

Lebensborn, I missed being in that programme.

[Sphere]

That was quick.

Am I wrong?

[Himster]

Educated adolescents about sex and providing minimal medical services is bad?
That's cold dude, seriously cold.

[nce_wht_guy]

Boo ing hoo

[Cat-astrophic]

Those two options are not mutually exclusive. You can provide information and services, and also tell kids to keep their pants on until they get older.

No, they don't want to promote that. They want to educate kids on sex and sexually transmitted diseases and make sure they have access to healthcare services in case they need them. They want to promote responsibility. Shocking, right?

The focus should not be in providing sexual services for children and normalizing sexual status at the age of 10 but the contrary. Responsability is different to no sex at all.

[PointOfViewGun]

The focus should not be in providing sexual services for children and normalizing sexual status at the age of 10 but the contrary. Responsability is different to no sex at all.

What? What do you understand by "sexual services" or "normalizing sexual status"?
And, no. Responsibility is better than the possibility of no sex at all. Kids have sex. It's better if they know what they're doing.

[DimeBagHo]

The focus should not be in providing sexual services for children and normalizing sexual status at the age of 10 but the contrary. Responsability is different to no sex at all.

In the case of the UN the focus should probably be on preventing UN officials and peacekeepers from raping and abusing kids. But that still doesn't make this program a bad idea.

[YukonTrooper]

In the case of the UN the focus should probably be on preventing UN officials and peacekeepers from raping and abusing kids. But that still doesn't make this program a bad idea.

Yah, that would be a start. That reminds me of the UN being involved in the underage sex-trade in Bosnia with DynCorp, the American security contracting service. 12-15 year-old girls from Slavic and Eastern European nations were sold into the sex-trade and then abused, raped and tortured by UN and KFOR security detail, along with private security contractors. Diplomats and higher-ups in the UN were heavily involved in the coverup as well. All to protect their petty prestige and the prestige of the UN, of course.

[.L.]

The focus should not be in providing sexual services for children and normalizing sexual status at the age of 10 but the contrary. Responsability is different to no sex at all.

If you want no sex at all you could always just remove the genitals surgically, it's the only way to be sure.

[sabaku_no_gaara]

The focus should not be in providing sexual services for children and normalizing sexual status at the age of 10 but the contrary. Responsability is different to no sex at all.

Yes because an adolescent will definately not do what a boring alien adult tells them not to do.


Are you bloody insane? I took up smoking at age 13 precisely because adults told me it was bad, I lost my virginity at 14 because it was a fun thing and I had spent the past 4 years watching high school comedies and other comedies where "getting laid" was the holy grail of achievement and the epitome of winning at life, thus teaching me that I would be a winner if I got laid. I thank the gods that I was tought from preschool on (at about age 10) where babies come from and what STD's are and wich precautions exist, I got drunk at age 13 and onwards because I was told I wasn't allowed to, I used illegal (in any other country aside from the Netherlands) substances starting at age 15 precisely because it was cool because adults made such a big deal about it.

I'm 31 now and I still have this reflex of wanting to do the exact oposite of what anyone who is 50+ tells me I should do. And when I'm 50 I'll probably have an urge to rebel against everything a 70+ year old will tell me to do

Instead of just saying "sex is bad m'kay, don't do it m'kay", a far better weapon against STD's and more importantly Teen pregnancy is propper education on the subject.

[Cat-astrophic]

What are you talking about, they're being told the risks of sex, how is that not adressing the problem? Not adressing the problem would be not telling them the risks.

No, the problem is: not telling them why they should not have sex while promoting contraceptive measures and abortion programs. We are talking about all kinds of countries here.

Well underage pregnancy and STDs are a far bigger problem than underage sex. We can only encourage young people not to have sex and show them the statistics and risks, what else could be done? Should we just ignore the problem and tell them nothing, because we've tried that and it didn't work.

Those things only happen because there's underage sex. No underage sex = no problem.

Are you bloody insane? I took up smoking at age 13 precisely because adults told me it was bad, I lost my virginity at 14 because it was a fun thing and I had spent the past 4 years watching high school comedies and other comedies where "getting laid" was the holy grail of achievement and the epitome of winning at life, thus teaching me that I would be a winner if I got laid. I thank the gods that I was tought from preschool on (at about age 10) where babies come from and what STD's are and wich precautions exist, I got drunk at age 13 and onwards because I was told I wasn't allowed to, I used illegal (in any other country aside from the Netherlands) substances starting at age 15 precisely because it was cool because adults made such a big deal about it.

That is your story. Your behavior/experiences are not equal to that of every other adolescent. If you chose to smoke and drink regardless of what your parents told you those were your choices.