Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 21

Thread: Starting next campaign based on units/bonuses/starting pos: Few Q's

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Starting next campaign based on units/bonuses/starting pos: Few Q's

    So I lost my most recent campaign and am looking to start a new one.

    I'm interested in Imperial factions, and I do have the Tsu clan from pre-ordering on Steam.

    That being said, I can't decide between Satsuma, Choshu, and Toga based on their special units (The three 'bears' for example) and starting position.

    I really like the idea of the Tosa Riflemen, I heard they're really good. At the same time, I've also heard the Red Bears are the worst out of the three Bear line infantry, in terms of gunfire.

    But the Satsuma ONLY have the Black Bears, so that kind of draws me away from them.

    The Choshu have White Bears who are apparently a middle-ground (?), and the Elite Kihetai whom I have no idea what they are.

    Anyway, any tips or suggestions on these faction choices? Should I go Tosa even though the Red Bears are worse than White and Black in terms of reload and accuracy?

    Any advice appreciated! Thanks guys.
    My machine:
    OS: Windows 10 x64
    MOBO: Z270 GAMING M3
    CPU: Intel i7 7700k @ 4.7
    RAM: 16GB DDR4 2666
    GPU: Zotac GTX 970
    Storage: Samsung 850 EVO + 5 HDD

  2. #2
    Thaded's Avatar Civis
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Somwhere in my Head
    Posts
    128

    Default Re: Starting next campaign based on units/bonuses/starting pos: Few Q's

    Well the Tosa Rifleman are fantastic enough to make up for the bears tbh. You should be fielding full imperial infantry anyway late game so the Bear infantry aren't especially important. The one thing I will say is that as far as colour schemes go I like the Satsuma the best out of the 3. The Tsu are pretty nice imo, but they are very different in terms of starting position and if unique units are your thing then you wouldn't want a Tsu campaign.

    If you pick based off of aesthetics realize the Tosa rifleman are one of the best units in the game at the moment. Tosa can be a rough campaign at times though so keep that in mind as well. I'm convinced that the Aizu and Tosa's starting difficulties were reversed accidentally on the clan selection screen. The Choshu have the best access to railways and therefore to kyoto though, and are an interesting faction to play for this aspect alone. Ultimately you need to decide what is most important to you; starting position, difficulty, colour scheme, and quality of the army. Tosa has the best troops in my opinion, but have a rough campaign at times. Satsuma has been relatively smooth sailing in my campaigns at the expense of unique units. I have yet to play Choushu so I can't really comment on them, maybe someone else can help you out with that. Hope this helps!


    Baruk khazâd! Khazâd ai-mênu!

  3. #3

    Default Re: Starting next campaign based on units/bonuses/starting pos: Few Q's

    How does one actually lose a campaign in FotS? Unless doing one certain, but rather insane challenge-playthrough. Oh well, whichever clan provides the best bonuses for a rifle-artillery based army.

  4. #4
    Brain_in_a_vat's Avatar Domesticus
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Liverpool, England
    Posts
    2,009

    Default Re: Starting next campaign based on units/bonuses/starting pos: Few Q's

    Quote Originally Posted by Thaded View Post
    Well the Tosa Rifleman are fantastic enough to make up for the bears tbh. You should be fielding full imperial infantry anyway late game so the Bear infantry aren't especially important. The one thing I will say is that as far as colour schemes go I like the Satsuma the best out of the 3. The Tsu are pretty nice imo, but they are very different in terms of starting position and if unique units are your thing then you wouldn't want a Tsu campaign.

    If you pick based off of aesthetics realize the Tosa rifleman are one of the best units in the game at the moment. Tosa can be a rough campaign at times though so keep that in mind as well. I'm convinced that the Aizu and Tosa's starting difficulties were reversed accidentally on the clan selection screen. The Choshu have the best access to railways and therefore to kyoto though, and are an interesting faction to play for this aspect alone. Ultimately you need to decide what is most important to you; starting position, difficulty, colour scheme, and quality of the army. Tosa has the best troops in my opinion, but have a rough campaign at times. Satsuma has been relatively smooth sailing in my campaigns at the expense of unique units. I have yet to play Choushu so I can't really comment on them, maybe someone else can help you out with that. Hope this helps!
    Tosa have the easiest campaign of any faction. Once you conquer Shikoku which is only occupied by 2 weak clans then you're pretty much set to conquer Japan. Nobody pays attention to you due to you having no land borders and you'll be reaping around 2500-4000 koku a turn if you upgrade the right buildings. Not to mention Tosa riflemen.

  5. #5
    Thaded's Avatar Civis
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Somwhere in my Head
    Posts
    128

    Default Re: Starting next campaign based on units/bonuses/starting pos: Few Q's

    Quote Originally Posted by Brain_in_a_vat View Post
    Tosa have the easiest campaign of any faction. Once you conquer Shikoku which is only occupied by 2 weak clans then you're pretty much set to conquer Japan. Nobody pays attention to you due to you having no land borders and you'll be reaping around 2500-4000 koku a turn if you upgrade the right buildings. Not to mention Tosa riflemen.
    My point is more that the beginning of the campaign can be rough, whit it really can be. Once you do conquer shikoku, the campaign will indeed become quite easy as long as you maintain a sizable navy. Its just getting started as Tosa that makes it rougher than others which therefore causes some people issues. People do pay attention to you though, at least in my campaigns. Perhaps you aren't playing above hard?


    Baruk khazâd! Khazâd ai-mênu!

  6. #6
    Thaded's Avatar Civis
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Somwhere in my Head
    Posts
    128

    Default Re: Starting next campaign based on units/bonuses/starting pos: Few Q's

    you can run out of time=P


    Baruk khazâd! Khazâd ai-mênu!

  7. #7

    Default Re: Starting next campaign based on units/bonuses/starting pos: Few Q's

    Kihetai are just really good line infantry, better than the stock Imperial Line, and you get them sooner. They stay the best until the Imperial Guard infantry or whatever it is they're called.

  8. #8

    Default Re: Starting next campaign based on units/bonuses/starting pos: Few Q's

    Quote Originally Posted by Frei View Post
    Kihetai are just really good line infantry, better than the stock Imperial Line, and you get them sooner. They stay the best until the Imperial Guard infantry or whatever it is they're called.
    So if this is true, would there ever be a reason to using White Bears?

    *EDIT* And yes, I kind of don't want to do Satsuma because it'll be almost entirely non-unique units, and I like the idea of the Tosa Riflemen; but I did indeed lose a campaign as Tosa already so need to figure out a way to NOT lose.
    Last edited by zorphon; April 02, 2012 at 09:11 PM.
    My machine:
    OS: Windows 10 x64
    MOBO: Z270 GAMING M3
    CPU: Intel i7 7700k @ 4.7
    RAM: 16GB DDR4 2666
    GPU: Zotac GTX 970
    Storage: Samsung 850 EVO + 5 HDD

  9. #9

    Default Re: Starting next campaign based on units/bonuses/starting pos: Few Q's

    Quote Originally Posted by zorphon View Post
    So if this is true, would there ever be a reason to using White Bears?

    *EDIT* And yes, I kind of don't want to do Satsuma because it'll be almost entirely non-unique units, and I like the idea of the Tosa Riflemen; but I did indeed lose a campaign as Tosa already so need to figure out a way to NOT lose.
    In my campaign, I didn't use White Bears at all because you get them either at or around the same time as kuhetai.

  10. #10

    Default Re: Starting next campaign based on units/bonuses/starting pos: Few Q's

    I find Tosa are the best Imperials. You've just got to make sure you influence the clans on the mainland near Shikoku to be Imperial aligned, otherwise you could face trouble. The Red Bears are indeed the worst Bear infantry, but unless you plan on going to war with Satsuma or Choshu, that wont be a problem. The Tosa riflemen are godly with their great reload rate.

    IMO if you want to do a republic playthrough, Tosa is the best Imperial and Aizu is the best Shogunate to do it as - simply because they're the easiest and have decent units that wont be replaced.
    Quote Originally Posted by Sir Brian de Bois-Guilbert View Post
    the Church has only improved mankind in history

    For this there are words, but none that abide by the ToS.

  11. #11

    Default Re: Starting next campaign based on units/bonuses/starting pos: Few Q's

    Both Shogunate and Imperial play throughs offer no challenge. Like Lazarus says the most intressting one is realy republic.

  12. #12

    Default Re: Starting next campaign based on units/bonuses/starting pos: Few Q's

    Bump. Any additional input?
    My machine:
    OS: Windows 10 x64
    MOBO: Z270 GAMING M3
    CPU: Intel i7 7700k @ 4.7
    RAM: 16GB DDR4 2666
    GPU: Zotac GTX 970
    Storage: Samsung 850 EVO + 5 HDD

  13. #13
    Kinjo's Avatar Taiko
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    5,758

    Default Re: Starting next campaign based on units/bonuses/starting pos: Few Q's

    I thought all of the bear infantry had the same stats in the single player campaign?

    Tosa is my favorite imperial faction plus having the extra range for naval bombardments is useful.

  14. #14
    Civitate
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    663

    Default Re: Starting next campaign based on units/bonuses/starting pos: Few Q's

    Why would anyone want one of the Bear infantries? I don't know if you get them earlier or at the same time as Imperial Infantry, but the Bears are worst than the Imperial Infantry. Other than looking different, what would you recruite them? I was using the Satsuma faction, so I looked at the stats between the Black Bears and the Imperial Infantry.

  15. #15
    Gaizokubanou's Avatar Biarchus
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    United States, New Jersey (That's East Coast)
    Posts
    669

    Default Re: Starting next campaign based on units/bonuses/starting pos: Few Q's

    Quote Originally Posted by Cathal View Post
    Why would anyone want one of the Bear infantries? I don't know if you get them earlier or at the same time as Imperial Infantry, but the Bears are worst than the Imperial Infantry. Other than looking different, what would you recruite them? I was using the Satsuma faction, so I looked at the stats between the Black Bears and the Imperial Infantry.
    If you are planning to go republic when RD event goes off, having an army that won't disappear is nice

  16. #16
    Thaded's Avatar Civis
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Somwhere in my Head
    Posts
    128

    Default Re: Starting next campaign based on units/bonuses/starting pos: Few Q's

    You get them 1 building level earlier.


    Baruk khazâd! Khazâd ai-mênu!

  17. #17

    Default Re: Starting next campaign based on units/bonuses/starting pos: Few Q's

    Hmm. So I guess the verdict is Tosa?
    My machine:
    OS: Windows 10 x64
    MOBO: Z270 GAMING M3
    CPU: Intel i7 7700k @ 4.7
    RAM: 16GB DDR4 2666
    GPU: Zotac GTX 970
    Storage: Samsung 850 EVO + 5 HDD

  18. #18

    Default Re: Starting next campaign based on units/bonuses/starting pos: Few Q's

    Quote Originally Posted by zorphon View Post
    Hmm. So I guess the verdict is Tosa?
    Nearly finished Tosa campaign of hard - seems to be one of the easies choices mainly due to the starting position.

    First of all - naval control, the first two provinces (granted you take out your first enemy) allow you to effectively have two fleets that with careful positioning can dominate the region. Second with fleet support you are free to take any provinces that you deem necessary. And then you have your riflemen that can score up to 500 kills per battle, never even got to imperial line due to that.

  19. #19

    Default Re: Starting next campaign based on units/bonuses/starting pos: Few Q's

    Quote Originally Posted by Timox View Post
    Nearly finished Tosa campaign of hard - seems to be one of the easies choices mainly due to the starting position.

    First of all - naval control, the first two provinces (granted you take out your first enemy) allow you to effectively have two fleets that with careful positioning can dominate the region. Second with fleet support you are free to take any provinces that you deem necessary. And then you have your riflemen that can score up to 500 kills per battle, never even got to imperial line due to that.
    Interesting, that's a lot of kills haha!
    My machine:
    OS: Windows 10 x64
    MOBO: Z270 GAMING M3
    CPU: Intel i7 7700k @ 4.7
    RAM: 16GB DDR4 2666
    GPU: Zotac GTX 970
    Storage: Samsung 850 EVO + 5 HDD

  20. #20

    Default Re: Starting next campaign based on units/bonuses/starting pos: Few Q's

    Quote Originally Posted by zorphon View Post
    Interesting, that's a lot of kills haha!
    If anyone is willing to clarify this but using those guys from the flank yields tremendous results.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •