I believe many people were puzzling like me when Kenya started their campaign against Al-Shabab last October, below is an article about the campaign.
SourceThe international hotels here are starting to empty; the restaurants and bars are bringing their tables in off the streets; and a queasy, quiet sense of dread is coiling itself round Nairobi, as the country waits to see what - beyond the two grenade attacks this week - Kenya's military offensive inside neighbouring Somalia might yet provoke by way of retaliation.
Kenya's government is trying to sound confident. The deputy interior minister assured me that the country was "safe for tourists", and that foreigners have no reason to stay away despite clear threats from the militant Somali group al-Shabab.
Let us hope he is right. Kenya's vital tourism sector has fallen victim in the past to unnecessarily shrill foreign travel advisories.
But Kenya's unexpected military incursion into southern Somalia is a dramatic development for a country that has spent years carefully trying to avoid just such an entanglement.
So was it a mistake? That seems to be the main question on the lips of aid workers, diplomats and a variety of officials I have been speaking to here over the past few days.
Some Somali experts believe this was a long-planned operation, arranged with the covert support of the US and other western allies.
The theory goes that the recent kidnappings of foreigners in Kenya were merely a convenient pretext for the invasion - that al-Shabab has been fatally weakened by its "horrific ineptitude" in the face of the famine and its dwindling foreign support, and that the next few months could see the militant group ousted from its key port of Kismayo and effectively finished off inside Somalia.
A slightly more modest theory holds that Kenya has indeed been planning for a limited military intervention to build a more effective buffer zone along the border inside Somalia - where it already co-operates with various ineffective local militias opposed to al-Shabab and into which it intends to push some of the tens of thousands of Somali refugees now camped in Kenya.
A senior western aid source told me that the UN secretary general has already called Kenya's prime minister to warn him against any attempt to violate international law by expelling refugees.
The question is why? Why Kenya, together with Ethiopia and AU, after been canning by NATO for four years for lack of action againsting Al-Shabab, finally decides to move their fat butt and started the campaign against Al-Shabab? Furthermore, the situation is even more strange when British foreign minister visited Somalia early this year, first time after two decades, together with UN Secretary General. Besides, world leaders even bother to meet together last month in London to discuss the future of Somalia last month.
Source
Many people are puzzled by this West's renewed interest of Somalia - after two decades of war and death, West suddenly find Somalia is interesting. Why not ten years ago? Why now? The answer is presented by BBC last week.
Construction has begun on a $23bn (£14.5bn) port project and oil refinery in south-eastern Kenya's coastal Lamu region near war-torn Somalia's border.
An oil pipeline, railway and motorway will also be built linking Lamu to South Sudan and Ethiopia.
Newly independent South Sudan plans to use Lamu as its main oil export outlet.
A BBC reporter says security concerns for the project may explain the presence of Ethiopian and Kenyan troops in Somalia aiming to pacify the region.
Source
The plan is to turn into Kenya into the oil refine center of East Africa, which the crude oil of South Sudan, Somalia (the oil reserve in Puntland) and Uganda would flow to Kenya for refine. Of course, to make sure the oil can flow to "right buyers", it is necessary to keep a West-friendly government in those countries, which is why it is necessary to remove Al-Shabab and keep a pro-West government in Somalia. This also happens in South Sudan, as the new nation was independent from the anti-West Sudan with West's back-up - to prevent oil remain under Chinese control. In conclusion, West's renewed interest on Horn of Africa is largely because its desire to control the oil reserve instead allow it fall into other competitors' hand, and it proves again that the existence of oil reserve is what importance to catch West's attention - not the genocide, not drought, not Joseph Kony nor millions deaths for whatever reasons.





Reply With Quote





