
Originally Posted by
Farwest
@Ansar Warrior,
please read my message again:
They are more than a small personal bodyguard army, Kapıkulu had both Gulams, and Turcomans (Sipahis or other cavalry) in its large army system.
It is not obviously true, they were especially picked from the sons of nobles or other important families; the Ottomans considered all its subjects not by blood, civic rank, or by their nation or religion; but their distinctive, unique properties. So Ottomans evaluated its subjects with their own features, their personal expertises. A simple slave could climb through the ranks and could achieve to be the top of the administration (being a Grand Vizier). Or a very strong governor could be stripped of all his titles and valuables; and could not rebel for this. All are dependent to the individuals' performance, to be better or worse.
So the Ottomans did not consider any individual, if he was noble or not, if he was muslim, greek, catholic or not. They are all at least humans and they are their subjects. Ottomans rule them very well, there was total justice in the administration. Also the all were picked by their properties, that's all. When this system was corrupted, backings were started (for example Albanians supported each other in the administration, giving the titles to one nation; with addition to Jews, Arabs, Armenians...) the Ottomans begun to decline.