FAILED 06.06.06: God for Civitates (Patron Grimsta)

**imb39** · June 05, 2006, 04:46 PM

God

He is as pure as the driven snow with no usernotes.

Originally Posted by God

I think I should be a civitate because I contribute to any debates I can on all parts of the forums and am online all of the time.

I know sometimes my posts aren't very long, but quality over quantity eh?

I am also incredibly fed up with having to keep writing these paragraphs. And I want that civitate banner.

Also, Apparently I caught Garb's eye, and if he thinks I'm good enough then who can argue??

Originally Posted by Grimsta

God has been with TWC for a while now and has only been spotted by two people, myself and as it appears - Garb. I think those two accolades speak for itself

However, I spotted God when he was a new poster at only 115 posts I believe and I have tried to patronise him before but I have met with failure on both occasions. Having reached a postcount that no non-civ should have to bear and indeed would make the Grim Squeaker blush with shame I feel that his time to wear that oh so grooveh Civ badge and Red Name is upon him.

Rejoice! for now is the time of God!!

**Belisarius** · June 05, 2006, 10:40 PM

He didnt even make the effort to write a proper Para and I'm not impressed. No.

And I want that civitate banner.

wtf

**Tom Paine** · June 06, 2006, 02:02 AM

I've got to say no, not based on the paragraph, but on the posting style which is reflected really rather well int he paragraph... too much spam...

**Obi Wan Asterix** · June 06, 2006, 02:22 AM

My vote is abstain. The presentation is bad... Grimsta probably told him how easy things are. I think a month reflection would help things a bit....

**Belisarius** · June 06, 2006, 02:24 AM

Originally Posted by Asterix

My vote is abstain. The presentation is bad... Grimsta probably told him how easy things are. I think a month reflection would help things a bit....

You voted Yes .. might want to fix that?

**Obi Wan Asterix** · June 06, 2006, 02:27 AM

Did.... my wireless timed out when I had yes on there and tring to save it failed... so I edited.

**Seleukos** · June 06, 2006, 04:03 AM

Being one of the older members of this process, I usually dont even bother to read the paragraph, but based on the posts in this thread I read it and still really dont care.

This is even exaptable to me:

I want to be civitates because I post good so I should be made one.

Abstained by the way. Nothing stands out but he is popular. I will further review later to see if he is worth it.

**Kagemusha** · June 06, 2006, 05:12 AM

He has lots of post,but im not really convinced,so i have to say no.

**Søren** · June 06, 2006, 06:02 AM

Voted : "I am the LORD your God who brought you out of the land of Egypt, from the house of slavery..."

**imb39** · June 06, 2006, 07:14 AM

No. I am not convinced. On that basis it has to be that way.

**Fabolous** · June 06, 2006, 08:20 AM

I like god. But when you look at the posts, how many are spam? Too many. Not alot of impresive posts. Not a civ from me...

**Spiff** · June 06, 2006, 08:36 AM

This is kind of what i mean when i ramble on about both deserving and wanting it for the right reasons.

He does contribute a fair bit, i like his posts and his threads are usually ok/good (a lot of one liners it must be said), but he shot himself in the foot with this paragraph, it ruins his case.. if he came back next month with a well thought out paragraph and some more good debates id perhaps have voted yes.

**Denny Crane!** · June 06, 2006, 11:59 AM

I'm going to say no for the same reasons listed. There is no substance to his posts, though I think he is obviously a nice person and likeable.

If we were voting for civitates based on whether we like someone he would get a vote but we aren't.

Peter