-
February 19, 2012, 10:00 PM
#1
Most Dangerous Middle-Eastern
Out of Egypt, The Turks, and the Khwarezms, which faction poses the biggest threat to the western Catholic factions? I'm asking in the sense of army composition, not location. Which factions' roster is most suited to fighting the western Knights, crossbowman, ect. No, this is not a "Which faction is the best question." Just curious if one faction is more suited to fighting the West than another.
-
February 19, 2012, 10:32 PM
#2
Re: Most Dangerous Middle-Eastern
Egypt or Turks probably due to AP weapons on some of their units that aren't terribly hard to get.
-
February 20, 2012, 04:35 AM
#3
Re: Most Dangerous Middle-Eastern
Turks, but they are killed by fatimids very fast. From far distance , most dangerous eastern faction for catholics are the byzantines. Mongols are eastern for you?
Kill Them All, Let God Sort Them Out!
-
February 20, 2012, 06:30 AM
#4
Re: Most Dangerous Middle-Eastern
He did say Middle eastern not eastern
-
February 20, 2012, 09:29 AM
#5
Re: Most Dangerous Middle-Eastern
In the early period it's the Fatimids no question. The Romans usually
the crap out of the Turks and the Fatimids do the rest. Kwarezmians have Mongols to deal with before they reach the Holy Land. The Fatimids can usually whether the mongol storm in one way or another.
-
February 20, 2012, 12:20 PM
#6
Re: Most Dangerous Middle-Eastern
Fatimids usual stop mongols, kill turks and conquer all the area.
But again, watch byzzies man!
Kill Them All, Let God Sort Them Out!
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules