Excerpts from this story HERE .
Currently, a lot of tension exists between Japan and its neighbours due to Prime Ministier Koizimi's visits to Yasukuni shrine. For those of you who don't know, Yasukuni was created after the Russian-Japanese war of the early 20th century to honour Japan's war dead (OK I searched and iw was actually founded in June 1869). Now unfortunatly, after WW2, many war-criminals (as deemed by the Allied court) were also interned at this site. Herein lies the problem. Many Asian countries feel, rightfully so, that the Japanese PM should not be visiting a shrine housing these people. However, some things may be changing within the Japanese government:
This quote is from ex-PM Mori, who still holds a great deal of political clout. However, I want to focus on the next statement:A former prime minister who could wield significant influence in the election for the nation's next leader suggested Sunday that the winner should not visit Yasukuni Shrine.
"If improving the present relations (between Japan and China) is important, then it would be better not to visit," Yoshiro Mori said on a TV Asahi program.
Do you think that it would be alright for the PM of Japan to visit Yasukuni, if the class-A war criminals were "purged" from the site? Personally, I think that this would be the ideal solution, allowing Japanese politicans to pay thier respects for the common soldiers of Japan, while also removing the political fire storm that currently result from these visits.Mori also touched upon calls from within the LDP to separate the 14 Class-A war criminals memorialized at Yasukuni along with Japan's war dead. The existence of the war criminals at Yasukuni is behind the virulent criticism by China and South Korea over Koizumi's repeated visits to the shrine in Tokyo.
"Yasukuni officials should think and decide what to do if (the memorialization of the Class-A war criminals) is hurting national interests," Mori said.





Reply With Quote














