Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 23

Thread: pahlava late bodygaurd

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default pahlava late bodygaurd

    I was wondering when I should use the secondary weapon , as the parthian late bodyguards, their lances is good and AP and it seems like they r a lot better then their swords, I'm not very experienced so I want to ask u in which situation should I use the secondary weapon and in which should I use the primary lances??

    same about the Persian hoplites , when should I use the swords and when should I use the spears.

    TUA
    Quote Originally Posted by Blatta Optima Maxima View Post
    So you have reached the "NANANANANA I AM NOT LIZTENING, YOU ARE WRONG" phase. Just a couple of posts back you were bragging about how the Persians lost because of their inferiority, now you're saying you don't care?
    BOM to Kakabis
    http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showthread.php?t=484498
    my AAR, please check it out

  2. #2
    Ferdiad's Avatar Patricius
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    28,041

    Default Re: pahlava late bodygaurd

    The BG have AP maces which have higher attack and spped than the lances. As for the Hoplites use Spears agaisnt cav and swords agaisnt Inf.

  3. #3

    Default Re: pahlava late bodygaurd

    The Persian Hoplites also automatically use their swords when fighting on walls, which is a nice feature and may be (can't verify it though) an advantage in comparison to other spear units that don't have swords.


    Quote Originally Posted by Ferdiad View Post
    The BG have AP maces which have higher attack and spped than the lances. .
    Nope, they have swords like the Gallic bodyguards. The Armenian and Saka late BGs have maces.
    I'd use the sword against unarmoured enemies, particularly skirmishers, because of its higher attack rating+speed as well as its high lethality (lower than the lance but still very good).

  4. #4
    Ferdiad's Avatar Patricius
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    28,041

    Default Re: pahlava late bodygaurd

    Quote Originally Posted by athanaric View Post
    The Persian Hoplites also automatically use their swords when fighting on walls, which is a nice feature and may be (can't verify it though) an advantage in comparison to other spear units that don't have swords.



    Nope, they have swords like the Gallic bodyguards. The Armenian and Saka late BGs have maces.
    I'd use the sword against unarmoured enemies, particularly skirmishers, because of its higher attack rating+speed as well as its high lethality (lower than the lance but still very good).
    I guessed tbh. I culdnt remember the BG name so i just searched for late and looked for generals units and picked the first one with I saw.

  5. #5

    Default Re: pahlava late bodygaurd

    Pushtîghbânę Shâhigân-î Pahlavânîg (Parthian Late Bodyguard Cavalry):
    - I'd use the heavy lance (0.4 lethality / ap / min. animation delay 200) for charging and in melee against armoured enemies, as the lance has the higher lethality and ap ability but slower animations (i.e. lower rate of attacks).
    - The sword (0.225 lethality, no ap / min. animation delay 0) I'd use againt non- or low-armoured enemies, as it still has a good lethality and faster attack rate but misses the ap ability.

    Kardakâ Arteshtâr (Persian Hoplites):
    - If you want the best results use the spear only, as they have identic lethality and animation delay, but the spear has the light_spear attribute which give it +8 defense vs cav and -4 defense vs infantry. Though as it's attack is 4 higher than that of the sword, it's effecively also better vs infantry (as the +4 attack beats the -4 defense).
    - If you want to play it use both (for the sake of realism or fun) then perhaps use the spear when fighting cavalry or holding the line, and the sword when using the hoplites to flank, fighting on walls or when cutting down lighter skirmisher units or archers.
    Note: You can give light_spear weapons less lethality than swords or lower their attack a little, if you want both weapons to have pros and cons.

    Regards.

    EDIT: Too late. Athanaric was faster, damnit!
    Last edited by Casual Tactician; January 30, 2012 at 06:00 PM.

  6. #6

    Default Re: pahlava late bodygaurd

    yo thanks guys +rep 4 athanaric and Casual Tactician , danke

    but I have noticed that my BG die faster when I use the swords no matter which opponent they're fighting .. or is it just me ???

    P.S : oh and I didn't know that about the light-spear attribute is there other such attributes that offer such advantages ... if so plizzz post them here , for example I know that AP offers an advantage when ur fighting an armoured enemy but what is exactly the advantages and disadvantages ??? same about other attributes like bonus fighting in woods/snow , frighting enemy infantry , bonus vs eles etc etc thanks 4 your help
    Last edited by the persian Immortal; January 31, 2012 at 05:36 AM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Blatta Optima Maxima View Post
    So you have reached the "NANANANANA I AM NOT LIZTENING, YOU ARE WRONG" phase. Just a couple of posts back you were bragging about how the Persians lost because of their inferiority, now you're saying you don't care?
    BOM to Kakabis
    http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showthread.php?t=484498
    my AAR, please check it out

  7. #7

    Default Re: pahlava late bodygaurd

    Quote Originally Posted by the persian Immortal View Post
    yo thanks guys +rep 4 athanaric and Casual Tactician , danke
    Gern geschehen.


    P.S : oh and I didn't know that about the light-spear attribute is there other such attributes that offer such advantages ... if so plizzz post them here , for example I know that AP offers an advantage when ur fighting an armoured enemy but what is exactly the advantages and disadvantages ??? same about other attributes like bonus fighting in woods/snow , frighting enemy infantry , bonus vs eles etc etc thanks 4 your help
    AP halves the opponent's body armour rating, i.e. if you fight a unit with 20 armour, your swordsmen will have a hard time killing it, but your axemen will only have to deal with 10 armour when fighting that unit.
    You can look up all those modifiers in Aradan's EDU guide.

  8. #8

    Default Re: pahlava late bodygaurd

    Quote Originally Posted by athanaric View Post
    Gern geschehen.
    hahah german is so awesome , I'm doing german in college but I'm terrible at it

    AP halves the opponent's body armour rating, i.e. if you fight a unit with 20 armour, your swordsmen will have a hard time killing it, but your axemen will only have to deal with 10 armour when fighting that unit.
    You can look up all those modifiers in Aradan's EDU guide.
    ahh thanks for the link bro +rep
    Quote Originally Posted by Blatta Optima Maxima View Post
    So you have reached the "NANANANANA I AM NOT LIZTENING, YOU ARE WRONG" phase. Just a couple of posts back you were bragging about how the Persians lost because of their inferiority, now you're saying you don't care?
    BOM to Kakabis
    http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showthread.php?t=484498
    my AAR, please check it out

  9. #9
    Civis
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    194

    Default Re: pahlava late bodygaurd

    Probably just you. Granted, I only ever use Hellenic factions but my BG seems to last longer when they switch to the kopis (iirc)

  10. #10
    Menestheus's Avatar Libertus
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    96

    Default Re: pahlava late bodygaurd

    I find that when engaging other cavalry units with your own cavalry it is almost always best to stick to the lance. It seems to me like if you don't then your opponents superior reach when using their own lances allows them to score hits on your cavalry before they can get in close enough to start doing damage. However, the Parthian BG's AP mace is very useful when fighting protracted combat against ground units after the charge.

    Plus I have a slight fetish for mace warfare.

  11. #11
    Menestheus's Avatar Libertus
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    96

    Default Re: pahlava late bodygaurd

    My bad, its not the BG's who use the maces but one of the other Parthian cataphracts, sorry about double post can't figure out how to edit. Nevertheless, the above posted principle remains the same.

  12. #12

    Default Re: pahlava late bodygaurd

    ^ the thing is that the lances r AP and that's why ur BG will do better against other armoured cavalry, however I wanted to know if the lances r so good when should we exactly use the swords then.... my understanding was that swords r only useful when fighting unarmoured units such as missile or levy infantry.
    Quote Originally Posted by Blatta Optima Maxima View Post
    So you have reached the "NANANANANA I AM NOT LIZTENING, YOU ARE WRONG" phase. Just a couple of posts back you were bragging about how the Persians lost because of their inferiority, now you're saying you don't care?
    BOM to Kakabis
    http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showthread.php?t=484498
    my AAR, please check it out

  13. #13
    Boriak's Avatar Senator
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Slovenia
    Posts
    1,199

    Default Re: pahlava late bodygaurd

    If the swords are armour piercing, they are equally valuable against armoured opponents, though maces often have higher lethality. Not always, though. Check the Units list.

  14. #14

    Default Re: pahlava late bodygaurd

    The only unit with a one-handed ap-sword is the Thraikioi Pelastai; and that unit is terribly OP imo. Cavalry swords are not ap. Some cavalry units use longswords though, and these have a higher lethality than maces or axes.
    Last edited by Casual Tactician; February 05, 2012 at 07:08 PM.

  15. #15
    Entropy Judge's Avatar Vicarius
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    2,660

    Default Re: pahlava late bodygaurd

    Quote Originally Posted by Casual Tactician View Post
    The only unit with a one-handed ap-sword is the Thraikioi Pelastai; and that unit is terribly OP imo. Cavalry swords are not ap.
    Uh ... no. There are plenty of units that carry kopis or falcatas, which are one-handed AP Swords.

    Edit: A partial list, specifically for one-handed AP-sword wielding Cavalry:
    Baktrian Horse Archers
    Cantabrian Light Cavalry
    Campanian Cavalry
    Hispanic Auxiliary Cavalry
    Hellenic Skirmisher (and Heavy Skirmisher) Cavalry
    Iberian Light Cavalry
    Italic Generals
    Lusotannan Elite Medium Cavalry
    Tarantine Elite Cavalry
    Iberian Medium Cavalry
    Lusotannan Bodyguard Cavalry
    Indo-Iranian Heavy Cavalry
    Indo-Hellenic Heavy Cavalry
    Ptolemaic Heavy Cavalry
    Elite Heavy Cavalry of the Italic Allies
    Sacred Band Cavalry
    Hellenic Cataphracts
    Companion Cavalry
    Baktrian Late Bodyguard
    Thessalian Heavy Cavalry
    Greek Noble Cavalry
    Iberian Heavy Cavalry
    Indo-Iranian Light Cavalry
    Kinsmen Heavy Cavalry
    Royal Kinsmen Heavy Cavalry
    Hellenic Medium Cavalry
    Hellenistic Mercenary General
    Epeiros Heavy Cavalry
    Liby-Phoenician Cavalry
    Pontos Late Bodyguard
    Eastern Mercenary General
    Baktrian Early Bodyguard
    Hellenic Bodyguard Cavalry
    Carthaginian Bodyguard
    Last edited by Entropy Judge; February 05, 2012 at 01:40 PM.
    I beat back their first attack with ease. Properly employed, E's can be very deadly, deadlier even than P's and Z's, though they're not as lethal as Paula Abdul or Right Said Fred.
    ~ Miaowara Tomokato, Samurai Cat Goes to the Movies

  16. #16

    Default Re: pahlava late bodygaurd

    Quote Originally Posted by Entropy Judge View Post
    Uh ... no. There are plenty of units that carry kopis or falcatas, which are one-handed AP Swords.
    True. Altogether there are 56 units in the EDU using a kopis or falcata with ap and 0.11 lethality.
    For some reason when I was thinking about swords, I totally forgot the these and only took the longswords and standard swords into account.

  17. #17
    Ferdiad's Avatar Patricius
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    28,041

    Default Re: pahlava late bodygaurd

    You dun goofed.

  18. #18

    Default Re: pahlava late bodygaurd

    what's the advantage of the pahlava late bodyguards swords ???? r they completely useless??? correct me if I'm wrong but I think that they are faster then other type of swords ... right???
    Quote Originally Posted by Blatta Optima Maxima View Post
    So you have reached the "NANANANANA I AM NOT LIZTENING, YOU ARE WRONG" phase. Just a couple of posts back you were bragging about how the Persians lost because of their inferiority, now you're saying you don't care?
    BOM to Kakabis
    http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showthread.php?t=484498
    my AAR, please check it out

  19. #19
    Boriak's Avatar Senator
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Slovenia
    Posts
    1,199

    Default Re: pahlava late bodygaurd

    That sword has a high lethality. It may not be armour piercing but it still does the job. My guess it's perfect for cavalry melee.

  20. #20
    Entropy Judge's Avatar Vicarius
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    2,660

    Default Re: pahlava late bodygaurd

    Except against Cataphracts.
    I beat back their first attack with ease. Properly employed, E's can be very deadly, deadlier even than P's and Z's, though they're not as lethal as Paula Abdul or Right Said Fred.
    ~ Miaowara Tomokato, Samurai Cat Goes to the Movies

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •