I can think of the fact the south-east is almost out of water as quite a good one.Originally Posted by Carach
I can think of the fact the south-east is almost out of water as quite a good one.Originally Posted by Carach
I am disenheartened to hear I share the same part of the country with you. Rain or not rain, water stocks are depleted.Originally Posted by Carach
Yeah, the fact it rains in one part of the country doesn't mean its raining in the South East; and the fact its raining doesn't mean its raining enough for all those people in Lodnon, the biggest concentration of population in the country, along with all the farmers and so on...
primus pater cunobelin erat; sum in patronicium imb39, domi wilpuri; Saint-Germain, MasterAdnin, Pnutmaster, Scorch, Blau&Gruen,
Ferrets54, Honeohvovohaestse, et Pallida Mors in patronicum meum sunt
If you want rain, come to Wales; we've plenty to share.
"Water! Never touch the stuff. Fish ******* in it" W.C. Fields.
Meh, I get far too much rain to joke about it. I think the North-West has had one water shortage in my life time. One. The rest of the time it hs a superabundance of the stuff...Originally Posted by Carach
primus pater cunobelin erat; sum in patronicium imb39, domi wilpuri; Saint-Germain, MasterAdnin, Pnutmaster, Scorch, Blau&Gruen,
Ferrets54, Honeohvovohaestse, et Pallida Mors in patronicum meum sunt
The Bishop of Rochester is going to die of thirst.
Oh man, this isn't even worth talking about. How silly.
What's the purpose of this split thread? What is it's topic? And if it's about rain, then what is it doing in the Mudpit?
Well it is a political issue at the moment.Originally Posted by Honor&Glory
We have experienced two moderatly dry winters. The arid areas of the country (which have always been relatively arid BTW) are being hit the hardest, with drought orders being called for in all these areas.
Where it gets political is when you take into account the severe mismanagement of the water companies (massive price rises in areas with a promise of reinvestment but a shareholder dividend given instead) and the fact that the drought is not particularly bad but the demand is, there is an increasing level of demand especially in the arid areas. This is what has mainly caused the drought situation not the lack of rainfall.
Since they rely on groundwater for 85% of there water needs the only solution is more efficient repairs to stop the massive waste and to invest in more reservoirs. Desalinisation plants have been ruled out because of the high energy input, they could offset it with on site green energy production but they are not willing to put the investment into such a project as the return profit is not there especially when they could just call a drought order instead.
In other words should water ever have been privatised? No.
In the north east in particular there is relatively low demand, high rainfall, excellent groundwater collection methods with very plentiful boreholes.
We are entirely of the same opinion. This is taking on-topic nagging to a new level.Originally Posted by Honor&Glory
I was just asking what the topic of this thread was. And "El Guapo" has already answered my question.Originally Posted by Ferrets54
Now then. Stay on topic people.
Because thy'd also need to take out a large number of other pollutants and then, at that point, it would be fit for consumption.... but would cost more than buying a litre of water in a bottle, pouring most of it away, and drinking the remnants, until you'd drunk a litre of water...
primus pater cunobelin erat; sum in patronicium imb39, domi wilpuri; Saint-Germain, MasterAdnin, Pnutmaster, Scorch, Blau&Gruen,
Ferrets54, Honeohvovohaestse, et Pallida Mors in patronicum meum sunt
If it wasn't for the fact that a ludicrous ammount of water leaks out of our pipes then there wouldn't be a problem. I love the way that the water companies, having caused the problem with their own incompetence, blame their customers for using too much of their product!