Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Federal Reserve Chairman Bernanke Considering Another Stimulus

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Federal Reserve Chairman Bernanke Considering Another Stimulus

    Ben Bernanke has "finger on the trigger" for another package after his announcement of increasing the inflation rate from 1.7 %- 2%
    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 
    CHICAGO/NEW YORK (Reuters) - The Federal Reserve has moved closer to embarking on a new round of its controversial money-pumping after the central bank and its chairman Ben Bernanke highlighted a grim outlook for the U.S. economy.

    Bernanke on Wednesday opened the door a bit wider for the Fed to return to buying securities in the months ahead to buttress a weak recovery and keep inflation from slipping too far below its newly adopted 2-percent target.

    "It sounds like the finger is on the trigger," said Thomas Simons, a money market economist at Jefferies & Co.

    The Fed's announcement that it was unlikely to raise interest rates until at least late 2014, more than a year beyond its previous guidance, immediately pushed down Treasury bond yields and Bernanke's comments to the media raised expectations of a further round of so-called quantitative easing, or QE3.
    It remains to be seen if the potential political backlash proves too daunting.

    The prospect of the Fed pumping yet more money into the U.S. economy was seized upon by Republican hopeful Newt Gingrich to slam President Barack Obama's record. That highlighted the political pitfalls for the Fed in an election year.

    Barring an unexpected pick-up in inflation or the U.S. economy suddenly kicking into a higher gear, Bernanke said it was logical that the Fed should look at ways to do more to help.

    "The framework makes very clear that we need to be thinking about ways to provide further stimulus if we don't get improvement in the pace of recovery and a normalization of inflation," he told a quarterly news conference.

    "Probably the main take-away from the press conference is the sense conveyed by Bernanke that it would not take much of a disappointment in growth or inflation to get the Fed to start another round of QE," said Michael Feroli, chief U.S. economist at J.P. Morgan.

    "In fact, from his answers it's not even clear any disappointment would be necessary to see more QE," Feroli wrote in a note, adding he was not forecasting another round of asset purchases even if the bar for action was low.

    The Fed in late 2008 slashed interest rates to near zero and has since bought $2.3 trillion in long-term securities in an unprecedented drive to spur growth and revive the economy after the worst recession in decades.

    Yet the recovery has been slow and the outlook issued by the Fed on Wednesday was bleak.

    With core inflation now at 1.7 percent and Fed officials forecasting unemployment to stay above 8 percent this year, many analysts took Bernanke's comments to mean QE3 is all but inevitable.

    MORTGAGES

    The Fed has trained its sights on the stalled housing market in recent months, so any move to QE3 is most widely expected to involve buying mortgage securities to help bring down further already record-low mortgage interest rates.

    Some economists said Bernanke may wait until the end in June of the Fed's "Operation Twist", which involves selling short-term bonds and buying longer-term ones in its $2.9 trillion portfolio to push down long-term interest rates further.

    Bernanke may also want to wait until the market has absorbed his sweeping changes in communications policy which included the Fed adopting an explicit inflation target and releasing the interest rate projections of its policymakers for the first time on Wednesday.

    Buying more mortgage-backed securities would drive down longer-term rates on mortgages with a view to countering what remains a drag on a U.S. economy still struggling to emerge from the worst recession in generations.

    "I think it could happen any time now, based on the language that we saw today," said Eric Stein, a portfolio manager at Eaton Vance in Boston.

    "I would think the first thing would be squarely focused on purchasing mortgage-backed securities, partially because Treasury yields are already so low, and housing is one of the major issues."

    POLITICAL PITFALLS

    The blowback from a heavy round of MBS purchases could be just as fierce as that provoked by the Fed's second round of quantitative easing which was announced in November 2010.

    QE2, which targeted Treasuries, attracted sharp criticism from Republicans who warned it could fuel inflation and crimp the Fed's ability to tighten policy eventually, and who accused Bernanke of going beyond the central bank's mandate.

    "People are now expecting more QE, and that would be in mortgages," said John Canally, investment strategist and economist at LPL Financial in Boston. "I think economically they (the Fed) would want to do that, but I don't know if politically they can withstand the forces against it."

    Republican presidential candidates have repeatedly criticized the Fed and Bernanke on the campaign trail. Asked about the Fed's latest statement, Gingrich said it was "a sign of the failure of the entire Obama program" that Bernanke is bracing for such weak economic growth that he will have to keep rates low for so much longer.

    At the same time the Fed is "putting in future inflation expectations," Gingrich told reporters in Florida on Wednesday. "It's more of Bernanke laying down a very bad future."

    Foreign countries slammed the Fed's previous bond-buying programs, saying they artificially weakened the U.S. dollar and hurt their exporters. Brazil's finance minister talked of a "currency war."

    Some economists say the political pressure on the Fed may prove too heavy.

    "A third round of QE is still beyond them - or maybe the chairman simply doesn't have the stomach for the congressional mauling that further asset purchases would have precipitated....," said Ian Shepherdson, chief U.S. economist at High Frequency Economics.

    Nonetheless, many others expect that the Fed will act again.

    Economists at 12 of 18 primary dealers, the large financial institutions that do business directly with the Fed, believe the central bank will undertake further quantitative easing, according to a Reuters poll after Bernanke's news conference.
    Some top investors have placed their bets, too.

    Bill Gross, who runs the world's largest bond fund, has ramped up purchases of mortgage-backed securities which at the end of November accounted for 43 percent of his holdings. The self-styled "bond king" said last month that any QE3 would likely be focused on the housing sector.
    Keith Wirtz, chief investment officer at Fifth Third Asset Management, with $18 billion in assets, said the Fed had gone "all in" with its promise to keep rates low through late 2014, and predicted that any rise in long-term borrowing costs would push the Fed to buy more bonds.
    "Brace for QE3 if rates start to move higher on the long end," he said.

    (Reporting by Ann Saphir and Jonathan Spicer; Additional reporting by Jennifer Ablan, Sam Youngman, Rodrigo Campos and Karen Brettell; Editing by Kim Coghill)

    http://news.yahoo.com/bernanke-finge...054144364.html


    Another article on the situation
    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 
    Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said on Wednesday the central bank was ready to offer the economy additional stimulus after it announced it would likely keep interest rates near zero until at least late 2014.

    The Fed also took the historic step of adopting an explicit inflation target, though Bernanke took pains to stress that officials would be flexible about reining in price growth when unemployment was too high.

    The late 2014 timeframe for the first rate hike was considerably later than investors had expected and some 18 months later than the Fed had suggested last year, and the announcement prompted a rally in U.S. government bonds.

    Speaking at a news conference after a two-day policy meeting, Bernanke was cautious about recent improvements in the U.S. economy, and he left the door open to further Fed bond purchases.

    "I don't think we're ready to declare that we've entered a new, stronger phase at this point," Bernanke said. "If the situation continues with inflation below target and unemployment declining at a rate which is very, very slow, then ... the logic of our framework says we should be looking for ways to do more."
    In response to the deepest recession in generations, the Fed slashed the overnight federal funds rate to near zero in December 2008. It has also more than tripled the size of its balance sheet to around $2.9 trillion through two separate bond purchase programs.

    The policy is credited with preventing an even more devastating downturn, but it has been insufficient to bring unemployment down to levels considered normal during good economic times. Many Fed watchers expected a further round of bond buying, likely focusing on mortgage debt.

    RANGE OF VIEWS

    Fed officials agreed that a goal of 2 percent inflation would be in keeping with their congressional mandate of price stability. By their favorite measure, core inflation is running at about 1.7 percent.

    They declined to announce a target for unemployment, saying the job market was often influenced by forces beyond their control.

    In another key shift touted as part of an effort toward greater transparency, the Fed for the first time published policymakers' projections for the appropriate path of the benchmark overnight federal funds rate.

    These showed a wide range of views, from the three of 17 policymakers who said they thought rates should rise this year to two who want to hold off on any increase until 2016.

    Still, the biggest concentration of estimates - five of 17 - was around 2014. The new, later expiration date for the Fed's zero rate policy pushed stock and gold prices higher, and dragged the dollar lower.

    In its announcement, the Fed repeated its view that the economy faced "significant downside risks" - an expression that has become code for the threat Europe's debt crisis poses to the United States.

    In economic forecasts accompanying the rate projections, the Fed pointed to somewhat weaker economic growth this year and next, compared with estimates published in November. Meanwhile, the unemployment rate, which hit 8.5 percent in December, was seen coming down only slowly.

    Economic conditions "are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels for the federal funds rate at least through late 2014," the central bank said. After every previous policy meeting dating to August, the Fed had said rates were not likely to rise until mid-2013.

    "Make no mistake, with changing 2013 to 'at least through late 2014' this drives home one important fact: the Fed is scared," said Tom Porcelli, chief U.S. economist at RBC Capital Markets in New York.

    Richmond Federal Reserve Bank President Jeffrey Lacker, an inflation hawk who rotated into a voting panel seat this year, dissented against the policy decision, preferring to omit the late-2014 date from the Fed's post-meeting statement.

    INFLATION NOT A WORRY

    The central bank appeared more sanguine on inflation than it had after its last meeting in December, saying prices were likely to run close to or just below its target. The statement dropped a reference to the Fed monitoring inflation and inflation expectations.

    Aside from the 2014 rate pledge, the statement hewed closely to the Fed's last policy pronouncement in mid-December.

    It described the unemployment rate as still elevated and, in a slight shift, acknowledged a slowing in business investment.

    "I think what they are seeing is that the rate of growth is not sufficient to bring down the unemployment rate," said Brian Dolan, chief strategist at FOREX.com in Bedminster, New Jersey.

    In December, the U.S. jobless rate stood at 8.5 percent, and some 13 million Americans were still actively looking for work but could not find it.
    While forecasters expect the U.S. economy grew at a 3 percent annual rate in the last three months of 2011, they look for growth of just around 2 percent this year.
    http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/...80N1DQ20120125


    Is the situation really serious enough to push for more security bond purchases? Also, is an inflation rate of 2% really healthy in the long-term? Furthermore, it seems as if the Reserve board is not concerned about the toxicity of putting the currency under more pressure from the historically severe deficit. It seems like Bernanke and Obama's chief concerns are spurring job-growth at the expense of inflation, yet, growing anxiety about these policies are slamming this position calling for the opposite. Spending cuts, followed by tax cuts, and trying to curb inflation is what opponents are calling for. Is a new stimulus really necessary at this point?
    Last edited by Admiral Piett; January 26, 2012 at 01:47 AM.
    Heir to Noble Savage in the Imperial House of Wilpuri

  2. #2
    Indefinitely Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    21,467

    Default Re: Federal Reserve Chairman Bernanke Considering Another Stimulus

    do these nobel prize winning brain trust really think that QE3 will work if QE1&2 failed so miserably?

  3. #3

    Default Re: Federal Reserve Chairman Bernanke Considering Another Stimulus

    Yes, lets raise interest rates and cut budgets. The UK and Germany did it, and its not like they slipped back into ... oh wait they did slip back into negative GDP growth. The ECB is looking quite foolish for having raised rates and now reversing themselves and having to lower them.

    This is why the Fed is independent. QE3 would be highly politically unpopular, but since inflation is still below target and unemployment high, its a no brainer in terms of traditional monetary policy.

    People will cry about hyperinflation again, but where exactly was this mysterious hyperinflation after QE1&2? Maybe, perhaps just maybe, the Fed has some idea about what will and won't cause hyperinflation.

    Unlike the ECB, the Fed never gave into political pressures and has continued a consistent monetary policy which is one reason the US is in a far better economic position right now than Europe which is flirting with a double dip recession.
    Last edited by Sphere; January 26, 2012 at 02:29 AM.

  4. #4

    Default Re: Federal Reserve Chairman Bernanke Considering Another Stimulus

    Quote Originally Posted by Sphere View Post
    Yes, lets raise interest rates and cut budgets. The UK and Germany did it, and its not like they slipped back into ... oh wait they did slip back into negative GDP growth. The ECB is looking quite foolish for having raised rates and now reversing themselves and having to lower them.

    This is why the Fed is independent. QE3 would be highly politically unpopular, but since inflation is still below target and unemployment high, its a no brainer in terms of traditional monetary policy.

    People will cry about hyperinflation again, but where exactly was this mysterious hyperinflation after QE1&2? Maybe, perhaps just maybe, the Fed has some idea about what will and won't cause hyperinflation.

    Unlike the ECB, the Fed never gave into political pressures and has continued a consistent monetary policy which is one reason the US is in a far better economic position right now than Europe which is flirting with a double dip recession.
    I don't see how the situations are comparable though. Ontop of that, I simply do not put same faith into these quacks that are playing a dangerous game with the dollar. Hell, our independent Fed under the glorious leadership of Alan Greenspan was a fantastic success, right? Yeah, the stimulus didn't cause a currency crisis, but we are at historic lows in terms of value - while our deficit is at historic highs, rivaled only by WWII. There has to come a time when the Feds realize that there is only so much they can do until they start letting the chips fall where they land.

    Plus, unless the situation is becoming dire again (which it really isn't, its staying pretty much the same in the US), I question the validity of its necessity.
    Last edited by Admiral Piett; January 26, 2012 at 02:38 AM.
    Heir to Noble Savage in the Imperial House of Wilpuri

  5. #5

    Default Re: Federal Reserve Chairman Bernanke Considering Another Stimulus

    The Fed unlike the ECB is given two mandates; hit a target inflation rate of ~2% and try and keep unemployment low. Inflation is below 2% and unemployment is high, which means they are failing in both goals.

    Since Fed interest rates are zero and have been for a long time, QE is their only tool.

    And I think if recent history has taught us anything, it is that Fed monetary policy is far less powerful than we might like to think.

  6. #6

    Default Re: Federal Reserve Chairman Bernanke Considering Another Stimulus

    2-4% inflation really is not a problem. In fact, at this point, Feds might be worried about economy tanking and we hit a deflation, which would be a disaster for businesses. I think another stimulus is necessary because the unemployment is way too high to speed up the recovery and businesses are sitting on cash rather than hiring. Something has to be done to jump-start the economy again.
    Have a question about China? Get your answer here.

  7. #7

    Default Re: Federal Reserve Chairman Bernanke Considering Another Stimulus

    Quote Originally Posted by bushbush View Post
    2-4% inflation really is not a problem. In fact, at this point, Feds might be worried about economy tanking and we hit a deflation, which would be a disaster for businesses. I think another stimulus is necessary because the unemployment is way too high to speed up the recovery and businesses are sitting on cash rather than hiring. Something has to be done to jump-start the economy again.
    I understand the logic in wanting it, but if it failed the first two times, is there any reason to believe its worth the risk to our deficit? At this point I'm thinking it may just be better to cut our losses and bear the coming storm, tbh.
    Heir to Noble Savage in the Imperial House of Wilpuri

  8. #8
    Denny Crane!'s Avatar Comes Rei Militaris
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Newcastle, England
    Posts
    24,462

    Default Re: Federal Reserve Chairman Bernanke Considering Another Stimulus

    Quote Originally Posted by Sphere View Post
    Yes, lets raise interest rates and cut budgets. The UK and Germany did it, and its not like they slipped back into ... oh wait they did slip back into negative GDP growth. The ECB is looking quite foolish for having raised rates and now reversing themselves and having to lower them.

    This is why the Fed is independent. QE3 would be highly politically unpopular, but since inflation is still below target and unemployment high, its a no brainer in terms of traditional monetary policy.

    People will cry about hyperinflation again, but where exactly was this mysterious hyperinflation after QE1&2? Maybe, perhaps just maybe, the Fed has some idea about what will and won't cause hyperinflation.

    Unlike the ECB, the Fed never gave into political pressures and has continued a consistent monetary policy which is one reason the US is in a far better economic position right now than Europe which is flirting with a double dip recession.
    No we cut budgets but have maintained what is practically a zero % interest rate for something silly like over a year now. Furthermore the cuts in our deficit have allowed us to borrow at historically low interest rates on 50 year bonds, there is literally nothing else the UK government can really do right now because its economy is so strongly tied to the Eurozone which of course it shouldn't be but it is. As long as they are frozen we are frozen.

    The USA is in a somewhat similar predicament though a stronger position with the recent surge in employment but the fact remains Europe is causing stagnation in much of the world right now.

    Quote Originally Posted by bushbush View Post
    2-4% inflation really is not a problem. In fact, at this point, Feds might be worried about economy tanking and we hit a deflation, which would be a disaster for businesses. I think another stimulus is necessary because the unemployment is way too high to speed up the recovery and businesses are sitting on cash rather than hiring. Something has to be done to jump-start the economy again.
    I agree inflation is being driven by other factors and should not be a concern,.

  9. #9

    Default Re: Federal Reserve Chairman Bernanke Considering Another Stimulus

    Economy down? Print more money.
    Economy up? Print more money.
    Deficit? Print more money.
    Surplus? Print more money.
    High unemployment? Print more money.
    Low unemployment? Print more money.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •