Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 34

Thread: $130 processor performs better than $1000 ones

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Civitate
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    North-Holland, 1 of the 12 provinces in The Netherlands
    Posts
    1,660

    Default $130 processor performs better than $1000 ones

    http://www.tomshardware.com/2006/05/..._41_ghz_cores/

    Pentium D 805, dual core 2,66 GHz with a FSB of 133 MHz. If you overclock the FSB to 200 MHz (easy) you get a dual core at 4,0 GHz, for which you would normally have to pay a premium.

    Plus, it's dual core, so easier multitasking as an added bonus and insult to injury. This will hurt AMD bad i'm afraid... enthusiasts will go to Intel now...
    Last edited by sunsmountain; May 22, 2006 at 10:27 AM.
    "in montem soli non loquitur" basically means that you should not argue against what is obvious.

    (> <) (\_/) Haha, die little bunny, die!
    (_)(_)(x.X) No soup for you!

    becoming is for people who do not will to be

  2. #2

    Default Re: $130 processor performs better than $1000 ones

    AMD was bound to get hurt anyway because of conroe.

    The earth is round. Like a pancake
    - H.Finkers

  3. #3

    Default Re: $130 processor performs better than $1000 ones

    Might as well as understand what the bloody hell you are talking about. Overclocking is far from something that always works. Especially when we are talking about overclocking from 133 MHZ FSB to 200 MHZ FSB. And you can overclock AMD chips too, you know.

  4. #4
    Darkragnar's Avatar Member of Ordo Malleus
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    India
    Posts
    3,958

    Default Re: $130 processor performs better than $1000 ones

    Nice article,
    reped you for shareing this.

    Quote Originally Posted by Lee1026
    Might as well as understand what the bloody hell you are talking about. Overclocking is far from something that always works. Especially when we are talking about overclocking from 133 MHZ FSB to 200 MHZ FSB. And you can overclock AMD chips too, you know.
    but not with a 20X multiplyer u cant
    Member of the House of Marenostrum
    They call this war a cloud over the land. But they made the weather and then they stand in the rain and say ****, it's raining!

  5. #5

    Default Re: $130 processor performs better than $1000 ones

    The multipler doesn't matter much. Most motherboards can get to 300 MHZ with out a problem. Mine can get up tp 340 MHZ. Do the math. With a low multipler of 10, that is 3.4 GHZ, which is more then good enough.

  6. #6

    Default Re: $130 processor performs better than $1000 ones

    Show me some official charts showcasing FPS.

    Otherwise... its conjecture thats very influenced by fanboyism.

    Personaly im an Intel man..... but come autumn (mtw2, bf2142 etc...) im building my own comp.

    Looking to spend a lot of money.

  7. #7
    Darkragnar's Avatar Member of Ordo Malleus
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    India
    Posts
    3,958

    Default Re: $130 processor performs better than $1000 ones

    Quote Originally Posted by Knight_Yellow
    Show me some official charts showcasing FPS.

    Otherwise... its conjecture thats very influenced by fanboyism.

    Personaly im an Intel man..... but come autumn (mtw2, bf2142 etc...) im building my own comp.

    Looking to spend a lot of money.
    You wanted FPS and Vola!.





    and these arnt the only ones there are about 20-25 more conducted useing diffrent things like multitasking,sandra SR2 etc...
    Member of the House of Marenostrum
    They call this war a cloud over the land. But they made the weather and then they stand in the rain and say ****, it's raining!

  8. #8
    Darkragnar's Avatar Member of Ordo Malleus
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    India
    Posts
    3,958

    Default Re: $130 processor performs better than $1000 ones

    so with a multiplyer of 20 , you can turn a 2.6 Gz Processor into a 4.1 Gz.
    thats the whole magik about it.
    Member of the House of Marenostrum
    They call this war a cloud over the land. But they made the weather and then they stand in the rain and say ****, it's raining!

  9. #9

    Default Re: $130 processor performs better than $1000 ones

    You are still missing the point - FSBs up to 380, 400 do exist. The FSB is EASY to crank up. The hard part is getting the CPU to stay stable at high speeds.

  10. #10
    sombralux's Avatar Civis
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    181

    Default Re: $130 processor performs better than $1000 ones

    Hope nobody tries this with stock coolers

  11. #11
    Darkragnar's Avatar Member of Ordo Malleus
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    India
    Posts
    3,958

    Default Re: $130 processor performs better than $1000 ones

    Ya but maintining the FSB at 380,480Mhz is not practical.

    thats where the Pentium D805 comes into play with the 20X multipler you dont need to crank the FSB that high just 205 MHz is sufficent.

    look at this chart.
    Pentium D 805 with 20x Multiplier
    FSB clock CPU clock
    133 MHz (Default rate) 2.66 GHz
    140 MHz 2.80 GHz
    150 MHz 3.00 GHz
    160 MHz 3.20 GHz
    166 MHz 3.33 GHz
    170 MHz 3.40 GHz
    180 MHz 3.60 GHz
    190 MHz 3.80 GHz
    200 MHz 4.00 GHz
    205 MHz 4.10 GHz
    210 MHz (THG clock) 4.20 GHz
    215 MHz (Maximum boot clock) 4.30 GHz

    and another thing Cranking the FSB to 133-166 MHz donst effect the Standard Voltage Levels either in an D805(1.3375 V) with both Cores loaded

    166Mhz = 3.33 Ghz.
    Last edited by Darkragnar; May 22, 2006 at 01:22 PM.
    Member of the House of Marenostrum
    They call this war a cloud over the land. But they made the weather and then they stand in the rain and say ****, it's raining!

  12. #12

    Default Re: $130 processor performs better than $1000 ones

    Quote Originally Posted by sunsmountain
    http://www.tomshardware.com/2006/05/..._41_ghz_cores/

    Pentium D 805, dual core 2,66 GHz with a FSB of 133 MHz. If you overclock the FSB to 200 MHz (easy) you get a dual core at 4,0 GHz, for which you would normally have to pay a premium.

    Plus, it's dual core, so easier multitasking as an added bonus and insult to injury. This will hurt AMD bad i'm afraid... enthusiasts will go to Intel now...

    The most important thing is the FSB. Those $1000 dual core CPUs you talk about have FSB speeds of over 2000 MHz.

    A CPU speed of 4.0 GHz isn't going to be of much use if your FSB is only 200 MHz.

  13. #13
    Incinerate_IV's Avatar Burn baby burn
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Pennsylvania, USA
    Posts
    2,042

    Default Re: $130 processor performs better than $1000 ones

    Quote Originally Posted by Honor&Glory
    The most important thing is the FSB. Those $1000 dual core CPUs you talk about have FSB speeds of over 2000 MHz.

    A CPU speed of 4.0 GHz isn't going to be of much use if your FSB is only 200 MHz.
    Thats not true, the highend processor still has FSB of 200mhz, with some new DDR2 ones going to 250mhz, but over 2000mhz is impossible.

    As for the overclocking, even if you can have 205 FSB it doesn't mean your computer is going to be stable. For any 4 ghz rig to be stable you would need some heavy cooling. The FSB doesn't really determine the stability of the CPU, most Intel motherboards can go up to 250-280 with no problem and AMD can go even higher.
    THE PC Hardware Buyers Guide
    Desktop PC: Core 2 Duo E6600 @ 2.8 Ghz | Swiftech Apogee GT waterblock + MCP655 + 2 x 120mm rad | Biostar Tforce 965PT | G.Skill 4gb (2 x 2gb) DDR2-800 | Radeon HD 4870 512mb | 250GB + 160GB hard drive | Antec 900 | 22" Widescreen

  14. #14

    Default Re: $130 processor performs better than $1000 ones

    Quote Originally Posted by Incinerate_IV
    Thats not true, the highend processor still has FSB of 200mhz, with some new DDR2 ones going to 250mhz, but over 2000mhz is impossible.
    It's not impossible. My Athlon 64 3500+ Processor has a FSB speed of 2000 mhz and it's not a dual core.

  15. #15

    Default Re: $130 processor performs better than $1000 ones

    Quote Originally Posted by Honor&Glory
    It's not impossible. My Athlon 64 3500+ Processor has a FSB speed of 2000 mhz and it's not a dual core.
    Suggest you go and check your CPU specs.

    A low multiplier is important as it is able to take mobo and RAM specificiations out of the equation leaving you able to concentrate on the CPU.

    My max FSB settings are 280 and 248. That would make hitting 300FSB with a 50% overclock on any other CPU - pretty hard.
    Last edited by Custor; May 22, 2006 at 03:49 PM.
    ...but I think Germany with home advantage will raise their game as always for the big ones and win the title. Post #260

  16. #16
    Darkragnar's Avatar Member of Ordo Malleus
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    India
    Posts
    3,958

    Default Re: $130 processor performs better than $1000 ones

    Quote Originally Posted by Honor&Glory
    It's not impossible. My Athlon 64 3500+ Processor has a FSB speed of 2000 mhz and it's not a dual core.
    ya i think it could be 200.0 Mhz instead of 2000.
    Member of the House of Marenostrum
    They call this war a cloud over the land. But they made the weather and then they stand in the rain and say ****, it's raining!

  17. #17

    Default Re: $130 processor performs better than $1000 ones

    Quote Originally Posted by Darkragnar
    ya i think it could be 200.0 Mhz instead of 2000.
    It's not 200.0 Mhz. Trust me. It's 2000 Mhz.

    For example:

    http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage....=1140392808026

    Scroll down to the bottom and look at "system bus".

  18. #18
    Incinerate_IV's Avatar Burn baby burn
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Pennsylvania, USA
    Posts
    2,042

    Default Re: $130 processor performs better than $1000 ones

    Quote Originally Posted by Honor&Glory
    It's not impossible. My Athlon 64 3500+ Processor has a FSB speed of 2000 mhz and it's not a dual core.
    Thats bus speed, different from FSB. On Intel the system bus is quad pumped, so its 4x the FSB speed. Not sure for AMD though, but its the same idea.
    THE PC Hardware Buyers Guide
    Desktop PC: Core 2 Duo E6600 @ 2.8 Ghz | Swiftech Apogee GT waterblock + MCP655 + 2 x 120mm rad | Biostar Tforce 965PT | G.Skill 4gb (2 x 2gb) DDR2-800 | Radeon HD 4870 512mb | 250GB + 160GB hard drive | Antec 900 | 22" Widescreen

  19. #19

    Default Re: $130 processor performs better than $1000 ones

    Quote Originally Posted by Honor&Glory
    ...My Athlon 64 3500+ Processor has a FSB speed of 2000 mhz...
    Quote Originally Posted by Emperor
    i have an amd64 3200+ with a 2000mhz fsb. care to question me?
    As the man says...
    Quote Originally Posted by Incinerate
    Thats bus speed, different from FSB.
    I'll set my mobo to 200FSB.
    You guys can set them to 2000 if ya like. But I think you may set your HTB to 2000 and NOT your FSB.

    EDIT
    Nice overclock for a cheap as chips CPU. The actual point of the thread before willy waving came into play.
    Last edited by Custor; May 23, 2006 at 03:18 AM.
    ...but I think Germany with home advantage will raise their game as always for the big ones and win the title. Post #260

  20. #20
    Darkragnar's Avatar Member of Ordo Malleus
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    India
    Posts
    3,958

    Default Re: $130 processor performs better than $1000 ones

    i forgot to mention when overclocked to 3.33Gz u can run the Comp on the stadard voltage but due to the design of the Fan the system crashes out in 3 min, thats because intel designed the Fan to be as quite as possible and because of overclocking the power cosumtion increases by 24 W so basiclly if you remove the fan and putin a new one you can reach 3.33 Ghz without any Cooling(Besides the fan ofcourse)
    and considering the Pentium Extreme Edition 840 CPU comes in at 3.20 Ghz stock (also with a price of $1,000) , thats not bad now is it
    Member of the House of Marenostrum
    They call this war a cloud over the land. But they made the weather and then they stand in the rain and say ****, it's raining!

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •