[Hotseat] Yet again another hotseat

**Dux** · December 21, 2011, 01:07 PM

Since Danscall's has gone missing the Yet another hotseat has come to a stand still.

So I would like to announce the Yet again another hotseat!

Players from Yet another hotseat will have priority, but we are two men short if everyone of YAH joins so other people can join too if they like!

We will use the new enhanced submod(see link below) version and play on difficulty hard.
http://www.gamefront.com/files/21042724/Westeros.rar

Players:
1) Lannister Meshakhad King Tyrion Lannister, ingame lord Kevan Lannister
2) Tyrell ljomx Lord Mace Tyrell
3) Stark Dux(Admin) King Robb Stark
4) Arryn Lh197 Lord Robert Arryn
5) Greyjoy Martin616 King Theon Greyjoy
6) Baratheon of Storms End (Renly) HannibalExMachina Lord Jon Cefferen
7) Baratheon of Kings Landing (Joffrey)cepragassen dead
8) Tully Jacb547 Lord Edmure Tully
9) Baratheon of Dragonstone (Stannis) vozd King Stannis Baratheon
10) Martell Antoniusz Prince Doran Martell

Rules:
No cheating
all battles auto-resolve
assassins allowed
no binding agreements with rules and penalties
1 turn peace and starting alliances

Suggestions for more?

I'll need everyone's password.

**Pinkie Pie** · December 21, 2011, 01:11 PM

I would suggest removing the console to make sure it can not be used to cheat.

**Dux** · December 21, 2011, 01:14 PM

Originally Posted by martin616

I would suggest removing the console to make sure it can not be used to cheat.

yes, I will remove the console.

**Pinkie Pie** · December 21, 2011, 01:14 PM

Also I think everyone should hand 2,000 gold dragons to the Greyjoys every turn

**vozd** · December 21, 2011, 01:17 PM

If someone lay siege on your castle,you can't destroy any buildings!

'no binding agreements with rules and penalties' - why not?!

**Dux** · December 21, 2011, 01:18 PM

Because those are stupid and take some fun away of the game. It should be all about backstabbing and building trust. Like the Game of thrones is supposed to be.

Who would like to be the second admin?

**vozd** · December 21, 2011, 01:22 PM

I will!

I do not have anything smarter to do.

Also: Can you send me link for new version of the game?

**Dux** · December 21, 2011, 01:28 PM

Originally Posted by vozd

I will!

I do not have anything smarter to do.

Also: Can you send me link for new version of the game?

see OP, link is in it.

about the buildings I think I agree on it. Perhaps, attacker may destroy any buildings he likes but defender may not?

@ Lh197: Sure you can.

**lh197** · December 21, 2011, 01:26 PM

Can I fill one of the gaps left by the two from YAH? and if yes Arryn please

**khatmar** · December 21, 2011, 01:29 PM

Id like to replay my Stannis, if possible.

Edit - just realized, Vozd is. Oh well.

**Dux** · December 21, 2011, 01:31 PM

Originally Posted by khatmar

Id like to replay my Stannis, if possible.

Edit - just realized, Vozd is. Oh well.

you can discuss it with him. Perhaps he is willing to take another faction.

**ljomx** · December 21, 2011, 01:31 PM

I guess I will take Tyrell. Also some suggestions:

-1 turn peace, 1 turn starting alliances
-Marriage alliances should hold some power
-No destruction of buildings at all
-2nd admin be somebody outside of the hotseat
-something to prevent unit spamming?
-some sort of victory conditions? not sure what though

**Dux** · December 21, 2011, 01:38 PM

Originally Posted by ljomx

I guess I will take Tyrell. Also some suggestions:

-1 turn peace, 1 turn starting alliances
-Marriage alliances should hold some power
-No destruction of buildings at all
-2nd admin be somebody outside of the hotseat
-something to prevent unit spamming?
-some sort of victory conditions? not sure what though

1 turn starting alliance is added.
No destruction of buildings is modified to attacker may destroy but defender may not. Is that good for you too Lh197?

Marriage is a strong alliance so the player who breaks it will be seen as completly unreliable and probably will have a hard time finding new allies.

What do you mean with unit spamming?

Victory conditions is when everybody is satisfied, the same as with the other hotseats.

**vozd** · December 21, 2011, 01:32 PM

Sorry!

If attacker take castle/town he can do what ever he want,but defender can't destroy buildings.
I think this is reasonably...

**lh197** · December 21, 2011, 01:34 PM

finally got a faction I actually want

Edit: what is wrong with the scorched earth approach to being besieged? I don't think it should be a rule

**ljomx** · December 21, 2011, 01:43 PM

I don't want to see castles being useless and being able to only recruit weak militia, especially Harrenhall which is usually fought over by 3-4 factions. Most destroy buildings for money but if both sides can't destroy the buildings then it would be fair also. If an enemy takes a castle it is almost a foregone conclusion the buildings will be destroyed and thus be useless the entire game.

unit spamming = having like 14 units of milita and 3 cavalry. Very effective in auto-resolve to just do this and is the cheapest

**Antoniusz** · December 21, 2011, 02:02 PM

I'd like to join and command Dorne

**Pinkie Pie** · December 21, 2011, 02:11 PM

I agree with ljomx on the buildings, they should not be destroyed under any circumstance whether you need money, have just taken a region or are about to lose it.