Well, what do you think?
Well, what do you think?
Yup. Education in theological background would, believe it or not, probably produce more atheists anyhow.
Sponsored by the Last Roman
Not in public schools imho.Originally Posted by Britisocialist
"Tempus edax rerum." Ovid, Metamorphoses
Under the patronage of Virgil.
In state schools you either than have to teach all religions alongside atheism, or none whatsoever, due to it being a state school in what is basically a secular state; in a privately owned school, its up to the owner, really.
primus pater cunobelin erat; sum in patronicium imb39, domi wilpuri; Saint-Germain, MasterAdnin, Pnutmaster, Scorch, Blau&Gruen,
Ferrets54, Honeohvovohaestse, et Pallida Mors in patronicum meum sunt
Completely agree.Originally Posted by Squeakus Maximus
They should on some level teach about them but not favoring one over the other, and in the context of history not theology.
Pale Death with impartial tread beats at the poor man's cottage door and at the palaces of kings. ~ Horace
...Life is but a dream for the dead.....
Under the kind patronage of Ozymandias
It shouldn't be should it really? I was subject to a fanatical schooling, choice in religous education should not be a choice it should be all or nothing.Originally Posted by Squeakus Maximus
Peter
Privately owned schools don't have to follow the national curriculum anyway; they have, being privately owned, every right to do their own thing, whether we like it or not...Originally Posted by El Guapo
primus pater cunobelin erat; sum in patronicium imb39, domi wilpuri; Saint-Germain, MasterAdnin, Pnutmaster, Scorch, Blau&Gruen,
Ferrets54, Honeohvovohaestse, et Pallida Mors in patronicum meum sunt
But that was your parents choice for you to go there, correct? They paid for you to receive that type of education (ie, catholic, non-denominational, etc). Unless I'm way off. If I am I apologize.Originally Posted by El Guapo
Pale Death with impartial tread beats at the poor man's cottage door and at the palaces of kings. ~ Horace
...Life is but a dream for the dead.....
Under the kind patronage of Ozymandias
I'm not sure because at my school religion cuses more arguments and debates than any other subject.
I'm fairly happy how our religion teacher does her job. (I go to a christian school...) She understands that we're not interested in studying the bible and its symbols, rather we discuss morals, habits, etc...Originally Posted by Britisocialist
Last edited by The White Knight; May 04, 2006 at 12:39 PM. Reason: Lost all sense of spelling for a moment...
"Tempus edax rerum." Ovid, Metamorphoses
Under the patronage of Virgil.
Why is that a bad thing? As long as religion is taught in a fair and unbiased way, I can't see any harm in it. My RE classes are the practically ONLY time I get to express my opinions at school (one of the main reasons I use this site), and I think that people should get as many opportunities as they can to do so.Originally Posted by Britisocialist
P.S: We usually don't actually get taught about religions, we discuss morals and then usually religions' stances on them.
"War! What is it good for? Absolutely NOTHING!"- War, Edwin Starr
It should be kept in mind that there is a difference between teaching something and advocating it.
Sponsored by the Last Roman
If only one religion is taught its as good as advocating it to the students.Originally Posted by David Deas
primus pater cunobelin erat; sum in patronicium imb39, domi wilpuri; Saint-Germain, MasterAdnin, Pnutmaster, Scorch, Blau&Gruen,
Ferrets54, Honeohvovohaestse, et Pallida Mors in patronicum meum sunt
At that age, teaching someone something is akin to advocating it.Originally Posted by David Deas
Think about it. How often are you encouraged to simply believe what your textbook and readings and memorize them compared to uni.?
People should be taught about religions, all of them, not taught the religion. Religions have played an integral role in human history and in the development of our ideals and cultures. This is just as important to history and culture as studying world wars, national history etc...
TWC Divus
in patronicvm svb Garbarsardar patronvm celcvm qvo,Professor420et Amroth et Jones King
Publius says: oh please, i love talk about trans-special mating. sends a gentle tickle down the back of my spine
MarcusCorneliusMarcellus says: i sucked at exams, but was considered the best lawyer in the class, because I could always find the hole
Evariste says: I have huge, feminine breasts and I love them
Thats an interesting point. And you would have to, at some point, touch upon to the students whether the stories you're teaching them about are fact or fiction.Originally Posted by gigagaia
Another problem I believe would be qualifying the right teaching. There are so many interpretations of a religion flying out there that people are going to have a problem with what you're teaching no matter what. Even if its the most objective interpretation of the scriptures.
Sponsored by the Last Roman
Well, in my public school last year we had a very quick glance over the three people of the book religions, as well as buddhism, in ancient/world history class. Also next year in my 12th grade English which has us read books from around the world, we might read the Koran.
That kind of things I have no qualm with, so long as you don't limit it to a specific religion. What I would have a problem with is a fully religious class, devoted to teaching, as would be the obvious case in america, Christianity.
There would be serious conflicts which head about from them existing in a secular school, as just a few weeks ago I nearly challenged the comments of a christian adajcent to me, who was essentially shutting up a girl who was asking questions about Adam's naming of the animals of the world (We were reading the mark twain satire of Adam and eve) by saying that 'god created all the languages of the world', which explains...somehow, that.
In a class that would teach the details of christianity or judaism or islam, we'd see a lot of conflict between the peoples.
So no. State and church remain separated. Allow it to come into privatized schools, but not public.
No. Never. Not even in private schools. Religion runs counter to logic and self-thinking, and it is logical human beings that can think for themselves that the school systems are trying to produce.
What about if the 'religion' lessons were really just debates on morals and ethics, with a religious perspective only being explored from a neutral standpoint?Originally Posted by Hapsburg
"War! What is it good for? Absolutely NOTHING!"- War, Edwin Starr
Mayhaps, but that's not really "'teaching' religion in school" IMO...Originally Posted by Elu Barcino
No, it's teaching. You're thinking of what I would call 'brainwashing'.Originally Posted by Hapsburg
![]()
"War! What is it good for? Absolutely NOTHING!"- War, Edwin Starr