I personally hate these kind of polls, especially when they try to label submods to be something which they aren't. I mean can you call PCP & Frome a compilation? PCP is about adding more difficulty & diversity to the map by introducing a crapload of units, factions and settlements. Frome basically does the same with regard to adding new factions and units.
The first submod for TATW that really could be labeled as a compilation was Point Blank's RR/RC. Although this submod was first all about implementing ''realistic'' unit stats and recruitment conditions, it more or less evolved into a compilation that included a lot more than this specific feature alone. Personally I consider this be a great loss, because the mod basically killed itself this way. At a certain point it became too much work for just one man to update it with every patch/update KK made for TATW.
The second compilation for TATW is my compilation which only focuses on the improvement of vanilla gameplay through mostly scripting-based optional features.
The third compilation is MOS. The first build of this compilation was basically a continuation of V2.0 of my compilation during my absence on TWC. The main goal of this compilation is to make pretty much every submod out there compatible with each other.
Sometime later we have FROGS, which combines Frome with other submods.
So if you want to make a poll and try to compare submods with each other, that’s fine, but plz realize what they are trying to accomplish!
