Is it right that I get a territorial expansion penalty when liberating a country? It seems if anything it should be viewed as a positive thing to give a country their freedom but I'm getting minus points for it.
Should I just occupy them? I can see some benefits if they can't give military access to an enemy then they can stop them attacking me, and if they ever join a war they should provide more troops than I could manage for the same province, but otherwise....
-
Territorial expansion penalty
-
Re: Territorial expansion penalty
The whole "territorial expansion" penalty is stupid anyway. In a game where war and territorial expansion is inevitable, seems stupid to penalize us for it. I hate especially how even in a war of defense you're still penalized. I mean how else are you going to defeat your enemy? It's not EU.
Links to any anti-developer or anti-publisher campaigns are not tolerated on these forums. Any such links will be removed and (most probably) the poster of the link banned.... Please be advised that any information uploaded or transmitted by visitors to Sega becomes the property of Sega. Sega reserves the right to... modify... or delete any of this information at any time and for any reason without notice.
— CA trying to prevent dissent on their forums
Originally Posted by Dalminar
