FAILED: Drexx for Civitates (Patron: Rzzza)

[imb39]

Drexx

My reason for wanting to become a Civitate is rather simple. I've been a member of these forums for around 2 years now, and it's become an online "home" so to speak for me. I feel a Civitate should represent the integrity of TWC as a whole while at the same time expressing his/her own opinions. Have I gone a little overboard in the past with these view points? Sure I have, but to err Is Human. As far as what I can offer as a Civitate, I'm a free thinker who isnt afraid to admit when I'm wrong and will help anyone at anytime if I am able. Not sure what else to say so I'll wrap it up. Any way it works out I'm honored to be nominated, hopefully I can join the proud ranks of the Civitates

Thanks,
Drexx

Drexx has been a TWC member for a while now, he has nearly 1,000 posts, and from what I've seen he is polite and shows a humble and modest attitude in debates, with a willingness to learn. I feel he deserves to finally get that civitate title, and I'd like him to get his chance under my tutoring, in the house of the Black Prince.

[Belisarius]

Bordering on Abstain, but he called Archer Hitler so yea.

Kidding, his posts arent bad.

[Tacticalwithdrawal]

yup....................

[Boudicca]

Nope...his comment on Archer is really disgusting and unworthy a Civitates. If however his warning had expired or he would be showing good conduct during the next weeks, I'd say yes then. Because overall his posts are not bad.

[Søren]

Nope...his comment on Archer is really disgusting and unworthy a Civitates. If however his warning had expired or he would be showing good conduct during the next weeks, I'd say yes then. Because overall his posts are not bad.

Not only did he call Archer hitler; he called me hitler first, and then called Archer hitler after being told not to. So a no for me.

[imb39]

No. It took a while for me to remember the incident (and I dealt with the final part of it... ) but he cannot be accepted so soon after a blatant attack on a moderator, ignoring the fact it was Archer!

If he can remain out of trouble for a month or two, then perhaps.

[Justinian]

Well ... I didn't know about that... but ... IMO, if we let him pass it shows that we don't discriminate just because they hurt our feelings as staff.

Can I get a hell yea?

(hell yea)

[imb39]

It has nothing to do with 'hurt feelings!' but of respect for authority. He displayed a complete disregard for that.

[HorseArcher]

I abstain. He has good posts and bad posts. Since i am one once being compared to hitler, i will stay out of this vote since my vote would be biased against him.

[Obi Wan Asterix]

Too many eggs.

[Valus]

Voted no...
I dont like his attitude, he should know to respect his superiors, and "an attack on his majesty's soldiers is like an attack on the king himself"...
Not worthy of civitateship until he calms down..

[John I Tzimisces]

No. We don't need a rebel without a cause.

[Søren]

Put him up in a month, and I'd vote yes.

(I informed RZZA of this)

[Obi Wan Asterix]

Failed someone notify Rzzza.