Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: The History of the Car Bomb

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Rhah's Avatar S'eer of Fnords
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,535

    Default The poor mans Air force (the history of the car bomb)

    I've just read an excellent article on the history of the car bomb, which i thought i'd share with you.

    "The Poor man's Air force" by Mike Davis

    Its quite a long article, but very interesting. For instance, according to this, the first "Car" bomb was actually used in San Francisco in 1920, by an anarchist. It was actually a horse drawn cart laden with explosives, and he was trying to kill J P Morgan.
    Or, that British deserters fighting with the palestinians were engaged in an exchange of car bombs with Far-right Jewish extremists in the late 40's?
    "Moral indignation is jealousy with a Halo" - H.G. Wells.


    Sig crafted by Bulgaroctonus, Member of S.I.N., Proud Spurs fan
    Son of Valus, Brother to Mimirswell and Proximus
    Patron of Shaun, Eventhorizen, Beowulf47
    and Rob_the_celt

  2. #2

    Default The History of the Car Bomb

    http://www.tomdispatch.com/index.mhtml?pid=76140




    http://www.lewrockwell.com/engelhard...lhardt180.html

    Can you give some idea about what you want to discuss rather than posting links on their own? Thank you - imb39
    Last edited by imb39; April 16, 2006 at 06:58 AM.



  3. #3
    Mr.Flint's Avatar Senator
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    1,300

    Default Re: The History of the Car Bomb

    Those two articles require a prologue, since unfortunately the author chose to overlook the previous history...
    Early History of Terrorism

    Terror in Antiquity: 1st -14th Century AD

    The earliest known organization that exhibited aspects of a modern terrorist organization was the Zealots of Judea. Known to the Romans as sicarii, or dagger-men , they carried on an underground campaign of assassination of Roman occupation forces, as well as any Jews they felt had collaborated with the Romans. Their motive was an uncompromising belief that they could not remain faithful to the dictates of Judaism while living as Roman subjects. Eventually, the Zealot revolt became open, and they were finally besieged and committed mass suicide at the fortification of Masada.

    The Assassins were the next group to show recognizable characteristics of terrorism, as we know it today. A breakaway faction of Shia Islam called the Nizari Ismalis adopted the tactic of assassination of enemy leaders because the cult's limited manpower prevented open combat. Their leader, Hassam-I Sabbah, based the cult in the mountains of Northern Iran. Their tactic of sending a lone assassin to successfully kill a key enemy leader at the certain sacrifice of his own life (the killers waited next to their victims to be killed or captured) inspired fearful awe in their enemies.

    Even though both the Zealots and the Assassins operated in antiquity, they are relevant today: First as forerunners of modern terrorists in aspects of motivation, organization, targeting, and goals. Secondly, although both were ultimate failures, the fact that they are remembered hundreds of years later, demonstrates the deep psychological impact they caused.

    Early Origins of Terrorism: 14th -18th Century

    From the time of the Assassins (late 13th century) to the1700s, terror and barbarism were widely used in warfare and conflict , but key ingredients for terrorism were lacking. Until the rise of the modern nation state after the Treaty of Westphalia in 1648, the sort of central authority and cohesive society that terrorism attempts to influence barely existed. Communications were inadequate and controlled, and the causes that might inspire terrorism (religious schism, insurrection, ethnic strife) typically led to open warfare. By the time kingdoms and principalities became nations, they had sufficient means to enforce their authority and suppress activities such as terrorism.

    The French Revolution provided the first uses of the words "Terrorist" and "Terrorism". Use of the word "terrorism" began in 1795 in reference to the Reign of Terror initiated by the Revolutionary government. The agents of the Committee of Public Safety and the National Convention that enforced the policies of "The Terror" were referred to as 'Terrorists". The French Revolution provided an example to future states in oppressing their populations. It also inspired a reaction by royalists and other opponents of the Revolution who employed terrorist tactics such as assassination and intimidation in resistance to the Revolutionary agents. The Parisian mobs played a critical role at key points before, during, and after the Revolution. Such extra-legal activities as killing prominent officials and aristocrats in gruesome spectacles started long before the guillotine was first used.

    Entering the Modern Era: The 19th Century

    During the late 19th century, radical political theories and improvements in weapons technology spurred the formation of small groups of revolutionaries who effectively attacked nation-states. Anarchists espousing belief in the "propaganda of the deed" produced some striking successes, assassinating heads of state from Russia, France, Spain, Italy, and the United States. However, their lack of organization and refusal to cooperate with other social movements in political efforts rendered anarchists ineffective as a political movement. In contrast, Communism's role as an ideological basis for political terrorism was just beginning, and would become much more significant in the 20th century.

    Another trend in the late 19th century was the increasing tide of nationalism throughout the world, in which the nation (the identity of a people) and the political state were combined. As states began to emphasize national identities, peoples that had been conquered or colonized could, like the Jews at the times of the Zealots, opt for assimilation or struggle. The best-known nationalist conflict from this time is still unresolved - the multi-century struggle of Irish nationalism. Nationalism, like communism, became a much greater ideological force in the 20th century.

    The terrorist group from this period that serves as a model in many ways for what was to come was the Russian Narodnya Volya (Peoples Will). They differed in some ways from modern terrorists, especially in that they would sometimes call off attacks that might endanger individuals other than their intended target. Other than this quirk, we see many of the traits of terrorism here for the first time; clandestine, cellular organization; impatience and inability for the task of organizing the constituents they claim to represent; and a tendency to increase the level of violence as pressures on the group mount.
    http://www.terrorism-research.com/history/early.php

    A History of Terrorism

    Terrorist acts or the threat of such action have been in existence for millennia. Despite having a history longer than the modern nation-state, the use of terror by governments and those that contest their power remains poorly understood. While the meaning of the word terror itself is clear, when it is applied to acts and actors in the real world it becomes confused. Part of this is due to the use of terror tactics by actors at all levels in the social and political environment. Is the Unabomber, with his solo campaign of terror, a criminal, terrorist, or revolutionary?

    Can he be compared to the French revolutionary governments who coined the word terrorism by instituting systematic state terror against the population of France in the 1790s, killing thousands? Are either the same as revolutionary terrorist groups such as the Baader-Mienhof Gang of West Germany or the Weather Underground in the United States?

    So we see that distinctions of size and political legitimacy of the actors using terror raise questions as to what is and is not terrorism. The concept of moral equivalency is frequently used as an argument to broaden and blur the definition of terrorism as well. This concept argues that the outcome of an action is what matters, not the intent. Collateral or unintended damage to civilians from an attack by uniformed military forces on a legitimate military target is the same as a terrorist bomb directed deliberately at the civilian target with the intent of creating that damage.

    Simply put, a car bomb on a city street and a jet fighter dropping a bomb on a tank are both acts of violence that produce death and terror. Therefore (at the extreme end of this argument) any military action is simply terrorism by a different name. This is the reasoning behind the famous phrase "One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter". It is also a legacy of legitimizing the use of terror by successful revolutionary movements after the fact.

    The very flexibility and adaptability of terror throughout the years has contributed to the confusion. Those seeking to disrupt, reorder or destroy the status quo have continuously sought new and creative ways to achieve their goals. Changes in the tactics and techniques of terrorists have been significant, but even more significant are the growth in the number of causes and social contexts where terrorism is used.

    Over the past 20 years, terrorists have committed extremely violent acts for alleged political or religious reasons. Political ideology ranges from the far left to the far right. For example, the far left can consist of groups such as Marxists and Leninists who propose a revolution of workers led by a revolutionary elite. On the far right, we find dictatorships that typically believe in a merging of state and business leadership.

    Nationalism is the devotion to the interests or culture of a group of people or a nation. Typically, nationalists share a common ethnic background and wish to establish or regain a homeland.

    Religious extremists often reject the authority of secular governments and view legal systems that are not based on their religious beliefs as illegitimate. They often view modernization efforts as corrupting influences on traditional culture.

    Special interest groups include people on the radical fringe of many legitimate causes; e.g., people who use terrorism to uphold antiabortion views, animal rights, radical environmentalism. These groups believe that violence is morally justifiable to achieve their goals.
    http://www.terrorism-research.com/history/


    IMHO it might be a good idea to move this to Vestigia Vetustatis.

  4. #4

    Default Re: The History of the Car Bomb

    Thank you Mr. Flint. Very good.



  5. #5

    Default Re: The History of the Car Bomb

    Well, it all started when Ford decided to be anti-semetic. He made cars to bomb the Jews of course.
    Why do you think Ford sucks as a company? A bunch of anti-semetics they were once led by.

    Car bombs are really annoying, our only hope is the stupidity in the world( the supposive matyrs denounced as shameful people ) die horribly and burn to death
    PelicanJournal -> pelicanjournal.org.
    Contact me at pelicanjournal@gmail.com if you want to write articles for it.

  6. #6
    Rhah's Avatar S'eer of Fnords
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,535

    Default Re: The History of the Car Bomb

    http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showthread.php?t=48453

    i already posted this on thursday!:p (no one replied though )
    "Moral indignation is jealousy with a Halo" - H.G. Wells.


    Sig crafted by Bulgaroctonus, Member of S.I.N., Proud Spurs fan
    Son of Valus, Brother to Mimirswell and Proximus
    Patron of Shaun, Eventhorizen, Beowulf47
    and Rob_the_celt

  7. #7

    Default Re: The History of the Car Bomb

    Quote Originally Posted by Rhah
    http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showthread.php?t=48453

    i already posted this on thursday!:p (no one replied though )

    Sorry man...didn't mean to tread on your toes.



  8. #8
    Rhah's Avatar S'eer of Fnords
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,535

    Default Re: The History of the Car Bomb

    Quote Originally Posted by Cadmium77
    Sorry man...didn't mean to tread on your toes.

    thats ok, i forgive you..

    So, i guess the real jist of this topic (and my previous one) is; how valid are vehicle borne explosive devices in the modern age of warfare?

    Is it a cowardly way of fighting a war, or tactical ingenuity on the part of the outgunned guerilla forces who use them?
    "Moral indignation is jealousy with a Halo" - H.G. Wells.


    Sig crafted by Bulgaroctonus, Member of S.I.N., Proud Spurs fan
    Son of Valus, Brother to Mimirswell and Proximus
    Patron of Shaun, Eventhorizen, Beowulf47
    and Rob_the_celt

  9. #9

    Default Re: The History of the Car Bomb

    Quote Originally Posted by Rhah
    thats ok, i forgive you..

    So, i guess the real jist of this topic (and my previous one) is; how valid are vehicle borne explosive devices in the modern age of warfare?

    Is it a cowardly way of fighting a war, or tactical ingenuity on the part of the outgunned guerilla forces who use them?

    You have wheeled machines delivering infernal engines.

    You have winged machines delivering infernal engines.

    Somebody is going to get hurt.



  10. #10
    God's Avatar Shnitzled In The Negev
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Wales
    Posts
    5,992

    Default Re: The History of the Car Bomb

    a bit of both really...

  11. #11

    Default Re: The History of the Car Bomb

    Strange neither article mentioned the Haymarket bombing in Chicago during the 1890's, which consisted of a bomb in a cart as well.


    A good plan today is better than a perfect plan tomorrow.
    --George Patton

    Hell hath no fury like a non-combatant.
    --Charles Edward Montague

    Oscar Wilde was a child molester. Quoting him doesn't mean that you're smart...you're just promoting a homosexual pedophile.
    --Sgt. Schultz

  12. #12
    Zuwxiv's Avatar Bear Claus
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    California
    Posts
    4,361

    Default Re: The poor mans Air force (the history of the car bomb)

    Maybe the other thread should be merged into this one? Anyway, very interesting. Brings up the question of the people vs the government.

    For instance, in the US, we have the right to bear arms. I prefer grizzly arms myself, ( ) but the point of it is that the ultimate power is the people, not the government.

    Well, ever since tanks, planes, and nukes, the people aren't much of a chance against the government. But somehow, they always find a way to create some form of chaos. Humans are really good at that.



    as pointed out, threads merged, cheers mate
    tBP
    Last edited by the Black Prince; April 17, 2006 at 08:37 AM.

    Currently worshipping Necrobrit *********** Thought is Quick
    I'm back for the TWCrack

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •