Moderators, you can go ahead and close this "debate".
And this is why we are going to have to end this debate. I asked you specifically to illustrate and defend your own points. Instead, you deliberately post responses to me by creationist authors and articles.
I also want to point out that your "source" is a moron for several reasons. Firstly, he took the time to explain to me what vacuum permittivity and permeability are, when I clearly illustrated and included them in my equation. Let's take a look at that, shall we?
What the
does he think the electric and magnetic constants are? Vacuum permittivity and permeability, that's what. And this man has a Ph. D. in astrophysics?
He also blatantly ignored the original Jovian experiment using Io's eclipse, and the other listed experiments that indicate isotropic synchrony. If you are going to have someone else speak for you, at least ensure that he is intelligent enough to deal with an armchair physicist.
I devoted quite a bit of time to improving your formatting, trying to get you to post neutral sources, and helping you correct your grammar. Most importantly, though, I took the time to address each and every one of your points as respectfully as I could. And what did I receive in return? Denials, a flood of creationist articles, and several headaches.
Your beliefs envelop you in an impenetrable bastion of ignorance; any attempt to get through to you will only result in frustration. I hope that this debate serves as a lesson to others - don't waste your time responding to total relism.