I'm very happy to have the chance to explain the reasons of our choices, glad to see that there's somebody interested in such details.Originally Posted by Idomeneas
First of all, don't forget that the equipment reproduced in our units is not related to the Greek "classic" age, but to the early and mid Hellenistic age.
The muscle cuirass with shoulder pads was indeed a Greek innovation introduced in the 4th century, becoming very popular during the Hellenistic age among the officers, the heavy cavalrymen and the elite infantry. the Italians retained instead the old fashioned muscle cuirass without shoulder pieces for a longer time, until the Romans introduced that feature in a later time when they adopted the Hellenistc officers panoply.
I think that your other doubts concern the helmets of the Syracusan units. We reproduced some of the almost infinite number of variations of the "Thracian" style helmets which spreaded in the whole Hellenistic world; a peculiarity of those "hybrid" helmets is the intermixing of features related to different styles, mainly from "Thracian","Attic" and "Chalcidian" types. Another example of "hybrid" helmet is the one used for our Italiote light cavalryman, basically a "Pilos" type with a metal brim drafted from the "Beotian" model; this kind of helmet is commonly associated with the Tarentine cavalry, since it is often depicted in those pieces of Italiote pottery which display cavalrymen.
About your objection about the un-colored shields I think that you mean the Italiote white shields. Well, ancient writers (maybe Polybios, I don't remember exactly) used the definition of "leucaspis phalanx" related to the Tarentine trops; it means " the phalanx with white shields", so we assumed that white could be a good base color for the Italiote shields.
Thanks again.






Reply With Quote















