(Failed) Eric for civitates (Patronizer: Last Roman)

[Obi Wan Asterix]

Eric

Hey, i'm Eric. I'm a lighthearted guy who will bring humour to the Citivate forums. Not only that, I do have a nice measure of intelligence and a rather extensive knowledge of history for discussions. I can be mature enough for serious discussion and I accept other people's point of view if it isn't totally racist and radical. I am a member of the Roman Catholic religeon but I am liberal enough to not judge other people based on their religeons like other Catholics have been sometimes known to do. I am be just and fair and I will definetely set a good example for all new users with citivate aspirations. Thank you for reading my paragraph and I hope you consider me for Citivateship.

Last Roman did not include a sponsor paragraph

[imb39]

I'll just say that his last warning precludes a yes vote for me. :no

[Justinian]

I don't exactly like this Eric fellow, but why not.

[HorseArcher]

I want to vote "let's make him a Praetor", but there is no such an option

[Seleukos]

Tails.

[Wild Bill Kelso]

a no..

[Simetrical]

I only have to read his warning. Um, no.

[Søren]

To be fair the warning is :

a) not too bad

b) it was said in reply to a post by Nazi_Fuhrer :

I wish there was a thread of the people that are not my favorite...

Anyways here are the only people that i respect here,

VaeVictus

and

Vincenzo Morello

And i do respect Major König, for his pride in Germany. Although he doesn't support it as much as i'd like him to. Too soft.

Considering that in real life it would be socially acceptable to be rude to white supremacists, I think that we shouldn't let that warning influence our opinions of him too much - especially if you consider his (N_F's) other posts.

I voted yes.

p.s. Asterix, I read his latest posts and I couldn't exactly see "Violent spamming and flaming"

[Obi Wan Asterix]

To be fair the warning is :

a) not too bad

b) it was said in reply to a post by Nazi_Fuhrer :



Considering that in real life it would be socially acceptable to be rude to white supremacists, I think that we shouldn't let that warning influence our opinions of him too much - especially if you consider his (N_F's) other posts.

I voted yes.

p.s. Asterix, I read his latest posts and I couldn't exactly see "Violent spamming and flaming"

Well.... Maybe I am confusing Erics. Is this the Eric that used to have the duck avatar with glasses?

That one was a terror of the CC. Maybe I have confused the two. In this case because of two recent warning I would still vote abstain. In the words of WBK which I agree, Last Romans seems to be handing out patronage like candy.

[Søren]

Well.... Maybe I am confusing Erics. Is this the Eric that used to have the duck avatar with glasses?

That one was a terror of the CC. Maybe I have confused the two. In this case because of two recent warning I would still vote abstain. In the words of WBK which I agree, Last Romans seems to be handing out patronage like candy.

He hasn't exactly had two recent warnings - one of them was almost five months ago.

Before we PM him though, is everyone sure that they're not mistaking him with this guy?

Erik

[Obi Wan Asterix]

He hasn't exactly had two recent warnings - one of them was almost five months ago.

Before we PM him though, is everyone sure that they're not mistaking him with this guy?

Erik

I did sorry.... Please change my vote to yes

[Seleukos]

Looks like he has failed. Any last words?

[Justinian]

If he can be polite and not be snide (don't use that exact wording ) then he is a good candidate.

[imb39]

I wasn't confusing him. I know that they are separate and distinct. Erik is Dutch, Eric is Canadian. I still vote no.

[Tacticalwithdrawal]

I vote yes

[Simetrical]

It doesn't matter. He fails. Tell him to maybe try again in a month or two.

[John I Tzimisces]

Er, I vote no, even though he has already failed. Read the thread before and forgot to vote...

[Valus]

Err....I must have missed this somehow...In any case I voted no..