Legislation has been proposed for regulating hot water temperatures down to a safe temperature quoting the need to stop the 600 accidents a year where people are burned. So they will legislate for 60000000 people based on something that happens to 1 in 100000.
What are the side effects of this legislation to you or I? A regulator that costs £80 to buy and god knows how much to fit, which limits your water temperatures to what is considered a safe margin. Scotland (in the spring) and Canada as far as I know already have these laws just to show I am not opining that England has a monopoly on insanity.
Madness.
PeterBe very afraid of the taps of mass destruction
Simon Jenkins (the times opinion column)
I knew it. Turn my back for half a minute and Tony Blair is into my bathroom pointing at the basin and shrieking. There is terror in the taps, fear in the faucets, panic in the plughole. He orders his Health and Safety Executive stormtroopers to kick down my door and take a sledgehammer to my brass-necked weapons of mass destruction. They constitute a major and imminent threat.
Mr Blair, fountainhead of global safety, has added water taps to the hierarchy of terrors facing the British people. Intelligence dossiers tell him what he most dreads, the water can sometimes run too hot. In future mixer-taps are to be compulsory. Nor can the British people be trusted to turn on the cold before the hot. These potentially lethal weapons must have compulsory thermostatic controls. Any Briton caught turning on hot before cold will in future be committing an offence and we know what that means these days.




Reply With Quote











