Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 79

Thread: Early Roman Army

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Early Roman Army

    I want to know if this army is good for early game with the Romans.
    Attachment 176145

  2. #2

    Default Re: Early Roman Army

    Needs more Principles, and you don't really need more than 2 Archer units.

  3. #3
    Maiar93's Avatar Primicerius
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    3,252

    Default Re: Early Roman Army

    Replace one or two equites units with principes and one archer unit with triarii/hastati and you're fine
    Predictor of AAR Plot Points and a wannabe forum ninja

  4. #4
    Jezza93's Avatar Centenarius
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Great Britain
    Posts
    886

    Default Re: Early Roman Army

    I personally try to be historically accurate.

    General
    2 triarri
    2 equites
    2 archers
    8 Hastati
    6 Principes

    And one mercenary unit to push the ram in a siege.

  5. #5
    Primo's Avatar Protector Domesticus
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    4,007

    Default Re: Early Roman Army

    I think your army is perfect, you should be able to beat everything the ai throws at you, and for that you have it, right?

  6. #6

    Default Re: Early Roman Army

    I never really used Hastati that often. Once I built the Barrack buildings that allowed Principles I stopped creating new Hastati entirely and just stuck with Principles. They are fine units, but I find Principles to be better.

  7. #7
    tudor93's Avatar Primicerius
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Unicul Bucureşti
    Posts
    3,373

    Default Re: Early Roman Army

    Quote Originally Posted by dude21862004 View Post
    I never really used Hastati that often. Once I built the Barrack buildings that allowed Principles I stopped creating new Hastati entirely and just stuck with Principles. They are fine units, but I find Principles to be better.
    well, they only have 2 more points in defense, it isn't such a big deal really ...
    Īnfrānt nu eşti atunci cānd sāngeri,
    nici ochii cānd īn lacrimi ţi-s.
    Adevăratele īnfrāngeri,
    sunt renunţările la vis.

  8. #8

    Default Re: Early Roman Army

    Quote Originally Posted by tudor93 View Post
    well, they only have 2 more points in defense, it isn't such a big deal really ...
    Yeah i know,there isn't much of a difference between Hastati and Princep except the fact that Principes have slightly more defense.

    @tudor93 HAI DINAMO!!!

  9. #9
    Kuroi's Avatar Civis
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    183

    Default Re: Early Roman Army

    Quote Originally Posted by tudor93 View Post
    well, they only have 2 more points in defense, it isn't such a big deal really ...
    That's incorrect.
    Principes unlike Hastati are disciplined(they don't panic this fast when attacked with fire/elephants etc)
    They have better formation. ("highly_trained" instead of just "trained")
    The have bigger mass(1.3 instead of 1.0) when fighting in close combat.
    They have class "heavy" instead of "light". (better defence against missiles and cavalry, I guess)
    So difference is a little bit bigger than you said.

  10. #10
    Blatta Optima Maxima's Avatar Vicarius Provinciae
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Free Democratic People's Republic of Latvia
    Posts
    10,738

    Default Re: Early Roman Army

    Quote Originally Posted by Kuroi View Post
    They have class "heavy" instead of "light". (better defence against missiles and cavalry, I guess)
    Nope, that only affects the buildings needed to upgrade their weapons.

  11. #11
    tudor93's Avatar Primicerius
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Unicul Bucureşti
    Posts
    3,373

    Default Re: Early Roman Army

    Quote Originally Posted by Cocroach the great View Post
    Nope, that only affects the buildings needed to upgrade their weapons.
    I thought hastati run faster than principes because they are light and principes are heavy ... so I was wrong ?
    Īnfrānt nu eşti atunci cānd sāngeri,
    nici ochii cānd īn lacrimi ţi-s.
    Adevăratele īnfrāngeri,
    sunt renunţările la vis.

  12. #12

    Default Re: Early Roman Army

    Well, if you fight a unit of Principles against a unit of Hastati the Principles will usually win.

  13. #13
    tudor93's Avatar Primicerius
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Unicul Bucureşti
    Posts
    3,373

    Default Re: Early Roman Army

    Quote Originally Posted by dude21862004 View Post
    Well, if you fight a unit of Principles against a unit of Hastati the Principles will usually win.
    well, of course, they have better defense, but as I said before, the difference isn't so big

    Quote Originally Posted by Pompey View Post
    @tudor93 HAI DINAMO!!!
    Īnfrānt nu eşti atunci cānd sāngeri,
    nici ochii cānd īn lacrimi ţi-s.
    Adevăratele īnfrāngeri,
    sunt renunţările la vis.

  14. #14
    ScottishAdam's Avatar Tiro
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Glasgow, Scotland
    Posts
    285

    Default Re: Early Roman Army

    Quote Originally Posted by tudor93 View Post
    well, of course, they have better defense, but as I said before, the difference isn't so big



    Not only that but the soldiers are more professional and have better morale. That is a massive advantage in a fight. Principes really outclass hasatii
    Mon the Scots

  15. #15
    Primo's Avatar Protector Domesticus
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    4,007

    Default Re: Early Roman Army

    Quote Originally Posted by ScottishAdam View Post
    Not only that but the soldiers are more professional and have better morale. That is a massive advantage in a fight. Principes really outclass hasatii
    They don“t have more moral. They simply have 2 armour points more. But you are right that they are more professional

  16. #16
    ScottishAdam's Avatar Tiro
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Glasgow, Scotland
    Posts
    285

    Default Re: Early Roman Army

    Quote Originally Posted by Nightmare Moon View Post
    They don“t have more moral. They simply have 2 armour points more. But you are right that they are more professional
    I noticed a huge difference in battle with these two types of units. Hasati will run away much easier and not grit it out as much as principi even if the battle is 50/50. I may be wrong here but they also seem to move better in formation than hasati (especially when leaving castle gates). Maybe that is where the professionalism comes in
    Mon the Scots

  17. #17
    KingofPoland's Avatar Semisalis
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    428

    Default Re: Early Roman Army

    I would say replace one archer with a pricipe and one hastati with a triarii. I didn't use those units much because I got the marian reform by 230 BC

  18. #18

    Default Re: Early Roman Army

    as far as the original army of the op--- it is fine

    as far as playing against ai--- there may be too much infantry (take original army and split it in two)

    recruit some of cretans/rhodian slingers to give your missiles some range to add to your 3 archers already and this will force every single ai army you face to engage you on your terms


    as far as principes versus hastati there is little difference other than needing a legion barracks to retrain principes versus a militia to retrain hastati--- aka hastati are "better" and more efficient

    legion barracks are really only necessary after the reforms-- until then-- they are not essential

  19. #19
    tudor93's Avatar Primicerius
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Unicul Bucureşti
    Posts
    3,373

    Default Re: Early Roman Army

    Quote Originally Posted by daxypoo View Post

    as far as principes versus hastati there is little difference other than needing a legion barracks to retrain principes versus a militia to retrain hastati--- aka hastati are "better" and more efficient

    legion barracks are really only necessary after the reforms-- until then-- they are not essential
    couldn't say it better
    Īnfrānt nu eşti atunci cānd sāngeri,
    nici ochii cānd īn lacrimi ţi-s.
    Adevăratele īnfrāngeri,
    sunt renunţările la vis.

  20. #20
    Blatta Optima Maxima's Avatar Vicarius Provinciae
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Free Democratic People's Republic of Latvia
    Posts
    10,738

    Default Re: Early Roman Army

    I spammed hastati. Nothing stands up to stack after stack after stack of experienced, cheap Romans. I only used principes when money was of no consideration, and when the few extra points were necessary.

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •