Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: FULL vs MANTANCE

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default FULL vs MANTANCE

    In the ESF editor Mojor nations have "FULL" and Minor nations have MAINTENANCE listed in the 19th line i am curious as to what effect this has on the faction's actions. The 20th line of also looks interesting but again i am unsure exactly what it does any one know what these do?

  2. #2

    Default Re: FULL vs MANTANCE

    This is related to campaign AI how the faction should behave. FULL factions have more lines, with more active behavior, where lesser factions are forced to maintain its provinces. This is the way how to make AI to not go wild with Saxony or Georgia and conquer the whole world with it.. (like it used to with RTW sometimes)

  3. #3

    Default Re: FULL vs MANTANCE

    Hmmm it sounds like if i changed all the factions to FULL the game would be more intresting

  4. #4

    Default Re: FULL vs MANTANCE

    and more unhistorical... depends what are you looking for.. sandbox campaign or semi historical game.

  5. #5

    Default Re: FULL vs MANTANCE

    Quote Originally Posted by JaM View Post
    and more unhistorical... depends what are you looking for.. sandbox campaign or semi historical game.

    More unhistorical then the Maratha conquering Anatolia? or the times i took over the entire known world as France, Russia and Sweden? As you can tell i love the sand box

  6. #6

    Default Re: FULL vs MANTANCE

    From my experience, If you play France or Britain, you can subjugate Maratha as they did historically. If you dont, they attack others.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •