FAILED: Internationalist for civitates (Patron: Last Roman)

[Seleukos]

profile

Distinguished members of the TWC staff:
I, Internationalist, have been a member of the forum for a year. I contribute regularly to the political mudpit, as I seem to have an unquenchable lust for arguing about politics. Although I am but 18, I am well read and strive to continue my education by any means, and I believe that this allows me to contribute to many parts of the forum. The duties that are asked of civitates, specifically those of reviewing administrative decisions, are within my capabilities, as I have a thoroughly questioning aspect and am sure to use it when I perceive mistakes. I visit the forum regularly and try to contribute as well as I can.
In closing, I believe that I will make an exemplary civitate because I am well educated, have a years experience on the forum, have never been banned, and moreover believe that I have never been reluctant to challenge authority when I believe that misjudgments have been occurred. I truly think that if I am allowed to ascend the ranks and become a civitate, you, the staff of TWC, will not be disappointed.

[imb39]

Where is Last Roman's para? and the last option? To demote Last Roman?

[Søren]

I believe that I will make an exemplary civitate because I am well educated, have a years experience on the forum, have never been banned, and moreover believe that I have never been reluctant to challenge authority when I believe that misjudgments have been occurred. I truly think that if I am allowed to ascend the ranks and become a civitate, you, the staff of TWC, will not be disappointed.

WOOT!!!



that may turn out good, or bad.

Reading his posts, I abstained, anyway.

[Valus]

Abstained
I think that he has the potential of being a good poster but sometimes he lets himself get into too heated arguments and revert to rather "cheap" tactics...

[imb39]

Abstained
I think that he has the potential of being a good poster but sometimes he lets himself get into too heated arguments and revert to rather "cheap" tactics...

But I voted no. Still waiting on that para... I suppose it's a bit pointless now.

[Obi Wan Asterix]

Thanks Sel for an understandable Poll

2 Warnings: No

[Simetrical]

Voted no. He often tends to be sarcastic in lieu of presenting sources, it seems from reviewing some of his posts, and then we have here: "jesus what a pathetically immature debate tactic".

[Wild Bill Kelso]

voted no.. his recent warning is just too close to see if he has moved past such kind of behaviour

[John I Tzimisces]

No.
...
Am I supposed to say anything else?

[Simetrical]

No.
...
Am I supposed to say anything else?

Yes. Since he's failed, we should try to be helpful and tell him why.

[Tacticalwithdrawal]

no, he gets too antagonistic in his posts too often

He's one of the names I look for when I'm watching the 'new posts' screen and moderating, although not a major one.

[Simetrical]

I've PMd them.