http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/Con...=1142722231554
Well...this should generate some interesting discussion...
A study by social scientists following kids in Berkeley for the last 20 years has reported that the whiny, insecure kids usually turned out to be conservatives later in life, while the more confident kids ended up as liberals. This echoes a 2003 study at Stanford that showed that (quoting from the article) kids who are "dogmatic, fearful, intolerant of ambiguity and uncertainty, and who crave order and structure are more likely to gravitate to conservatism."
The researchers freely admit that, since the study took place in Berkeley (not exactly a bastion of conservatism), it's not necessarily representative of the whole nation. But it does go a long way to dispelling the myth that liberals are somehow weaker than conservatives.
Not surprisingly, these studies have their detractors.
Let crazy ideological warfare commence!





Reply With Quote














