Not this nonsense again.
If Hitler didn't, then why did his troops occupy large part of Poland and partioned it with Stalin? That is, parts that were never German in the first place.
Do you have any source for this oppression of Germans in Poland?
Anyway, eventhough Danzig was mostly German, that alone is not reason enough to attack and occupy an entire country. Any source that backs up this claim that Germans made up 98%?
According to Wikipedia, the Polish minority made up between 9-34% of the population.
Last edited by Tiberios; July 10, 2011 at 11:34 AM.
To defeat enemy you must occupy it till it surrenders, Poland didn't so it was occupied all until peace deal is made.
When Hitler tried to negotiate peace with British Empire, he offered to free it all except for rightful German territories, it was after fall of France.
Yes, I've look at this thread:
http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showthread.php?t=462016
It's propaganda on Wikipedia.
Have no source for this avaible now sadly.
Yes indeed, that's why he kept Poland occupied. Hitler was a manic bent on imposing his sick ideaology on Europe and murdering or enslaving all he considered untermensch.
Yeah that thread was a rather bad attempt at historical revisionism as well and the OP was proven wrong on several occasions.
Yeah. I would have thought as much. It doesn't say what you want it to say so obviously it's propaganda.
How so very surprising.
Last edited by Tiberios; July 10, 2011 at 01:05 PM.
Uh, lolwut? Poland never owned Danzig, it was set up as a free city from 1920 to 1939 when it was occupied by the Germans and incorporated into the Third Reich. Not Poland.
Which totally explains why the man took more than "rightful" German lands.Hitler didn't wanted to occupy all of Poland, he only wanted rightful German lands who where owned by Poland.
Here's a map of German-speaking (though, for some reason it also includes Dutch) regions in 1939:
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Here's a map of Germany and the surrounding countries in 1914:
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Here's Germany in 1933, before the annexations began:
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Now, finally, here's the "Greater German Reich," also showing the regions it occupied, its allies/collaborationist states, and satellite nations:
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Clearly, Hitler went quite above and beyond "reclaiming rightfully German lands."
LOLIt's propaganda on Wikipedia.
Have no source for this avaible now sadly.
Last edited by Dan the Man; July 10, 2011 at 01:13 PM.
How else he's gonna win the war?
Hitler said Germany would only need 500,000 km2 land to be on par with British Empire and USA.
Have much would it have when Germanic people would be united?
That's because I'm still writing and I was away for 10 minutes. I'll reply to your post later. I've no time now.
When did he imposed his ideology? All his allies became Fascists by themselves and that system actually works unlike communism and democracy.
He proved only you wrong. I was reading your sources and it was full of propaganda.
Last edited by L-Burna; July 10, 2011 at 02:36 PM.
And he doesn't even attempt to answer anybody else. How droll.
And predictable.
Shouldnt have started a war.
Huh?
two things, 1. That is not true, puppet governments generally arent that well accepted by the people. 2. if Fascism worked why is it not around anymore? At least in any developed nation?
Prove its propaganda.
Thanks for the link. Going to take me some time going through, but so far it's very interesting. If you have more of the them, I'm very interested. I was strucked when I saw 5 steps to tyranny, and 65% of people had obeyed a complete stranger wearing a white coat to give a lethal electric shock to another complete stranger in the Milgram experiment is chilling. A few month after watching the five step to tyranny, I saw this live, and I thought OMG, it's almost 4 steps out of the 5 and everyone is clapping.
I wasn't aware that amount of archives existed. I was under the inpression there wasn't that many official documentation available to prove a delibarate policy of extermination. For exemple in many reportages or articles I read, the number of jews sent to camps are estimated from the receipt of the transportation fare charged by the train company, not by nazy documentation. Researchers seemed to gain info through indirect link. See answer to Amagi for more details.
I certainly can't say it is truthful either. In the UK I'm sure Dr Shipman actually treated some old folks in a very professional way, but it doesn't mean he is unindeniably innocent. There even were jews, half jews and quarter jews serving with the 3rd Reich, some at very high places (link).
I read about classes to edit the wiki held by some jews, but the link to the wiki was never ment as a replacement to actually watching the original document. Just that I doubt there is an english version ot it.First, I find wikipedia a not so good source, in particular is the case with the topic at hand.
Shoah is on youtube (link to episode 1/59, warning contained material is upsetting)
I know it's just the opinion of one man (inertview start at 6:10), but he explain the dynamic of the evolution of the final solution.
It's not a picture and it'not about a gas chamber, but it's proof enough for me of intent to commit mass murder. Start at 8:10, it's the feed back on how to improve the gaz trucks, very strong warning to the sensitive and link to second part.Could you provide me with a link of a picture of a gas chamber? The weapon of massmurder, I would like to see it.
I'm sure you will dismiss this one, but here you go, start at 3:07 and second part
I see, but you specifically quoted my post and responded by talking about tattoos which I never brought up. Wait, I just looked up your post again and it seems you (accidentally?) added in Lord Zhang Ku's post and said it was me who said it. I never said anything about tattoos. Please be careful when you're responding to people.
Show me those air tight door gaschambers then!!
http://www.holocaust-history.org/aus...les/046-01.jpe
I see a wooden door. What do you see? Is that your "air tight nazi gaschamber"? Are you serious or trolling me? I find that an insult to my intellect. A simple "wooden door, black and white photo" google image search will find me better results. Thats really just pathetic.
You know, you could actually try to refute what I'm saying instead of simply disregarding what I post. I'm taking the time to reply to you and try to express all of my thoughts and opinions clearly. I expect the same from you. Here is a picture of a Soviet soldier posing with a gas detector with the same air-tight door I posted behind him. http://www.holocaust-history.org/aus...ssac0047.shtml
Its the other way round: You only have delousing chambers, no genocidal ones to show off. The problem is definately on your -the accuser´s- side of the fence.
What myself, and many others, believe is what the vast majority of people believe, that is, the Holocaust happened and the Nazis used gas chambers to kill prisoners. It is commonly known history. The Nazis have already been tried and convicted. Many admitted their guilt. So, it's not our responsibility to justify evidence of the Holocaust. However, since you're obviously anti-Jew and a Holocaust denier, some of us have decided to take the time to refute your bizarre beliefs.
When they stop telling lies about us, I will stop to tell the truth about them.
Us? Who is "us"?
Last edited by Lord Rahl; July 10, 2011 at 06:16 PM.
Patron of: Ó Cathasaigh, Major. Stupidity, Kscott, Major König, Nationalist_Cause, Kleos, Rush Limbaugh, General_Curtis_LeMay, and NIKO_TWOW.RU | Patronized by: MadBurgerMaker
Opifex, Civitate, ex-CdeC, Ex-Urbanis Legio, Ex-Quaestor, Ex-Helios Editor, Sig God, Skin Creator & Badge Forger
I may be back... | @BeardedRiker
Us gentiles of course.
But lets not make this a topic about the talmud and kol nidre, I am still waiting for the murder weapon. Some russians standing with canisters of bugspray in front of an air-raid shelter door. You know how impressed I am now.
Kind regards.
That's funny, a majority of people here are gentiles and we all seem to disagree with you.
Why the hell would Nazis need a bunch of Zyklon B for an air raid shelter?
Patron of: Ó Cathasaigh, Major. Stupidity, Kscott, Major König, Nationalist_Cause, Kleos, Rush Limbaugh, General_Curtis_LeMay, and NIKO_TWOW.RU | Patronized by: MadBurgerMaker
Opifex, Civitate, ex-CdeC, Ex-Urbanis Legio, Ex-Quaestor, Ex-Helios Editor, Sig God, Skin Creator & Badge Forger
I may be back... | @BeardedRiker
I am a gentile and I don't want to be associated with you, Amagi.
So why have the air raid shelters in Majdanek lots of traces of Prussian blue, caused by the heavy use of Zyklon-B inside, Amagi? Why could the doors of the air raid shelters in Majdanek be locked with iron bars from the outside? And who would be so stupid to build an air raid shelter made of bricks above ground level?
Can you answer these simple questions?
Last edited by Jagdpanzer; July 10, 2011 at 06:49 PM.
They had bugs in their breeches, you know.
Probably because of all the insects attracted by the rotting piles of dead humans.
Some day I'll actually write all the reviews I keep promising...
To be honest , every atom in my body screams 'ignore!!!' . Still , stupid as I am , I'll post my opinion.
@Amagi : Could you please , post a detailed academic source , instead of some random youtube movie , about the stuff you claim. I'd be happy to reconsider my opinion if your sources weren't so crappy. Please dig into an archive , write a well researched piece which proves all your claims . Show us intelligent people the real deal!
Instead I get some crappy youtube videos , some random pictures , some text in bold , and a lot 'mindgames' on your part. Show us 'sceptics' the truth , well written , with the proper backup.(You've got the power ! Use it!) I'd rather accept the academic work I read on the subject so far, than accept your poor 'explanation' .
tl;dr: I expect better!
Last edited by LaMuerte; July 10, 2011 at 07:13 PM.
He can't do it because the evil western lizard people eat everyone who trys to legitamitly publish a paper or work on the truth. The western propoganda is also very very efficiant at taking young people who might one day expose the truth and turning them into conformists.
odi et amo quare id faciam fortasse requiris / nescio sed fieri sentio et excrucior