FAILED: Hub'ite for civitates (Patron: Seleukos)

**Seleukos** · March 19, 2006, 03:05 AM

Its him!!! Run for youre lives!!!! Save the children!!!!!

I've been a member on this forum for over a year now.(I'm under a newer name) I became a member a little before RTW came out. I first signed up to download the TimeCommander videos. I really enjoy spending my free time on TWC. I love debating with the intelligent members in the Pit and talking about anything in Thema Devia. I also love talking with members from all over the world. Its great when people from all over come together and talk about the TW series.

A civitate is a member of the forum who contributes well and sets a good example for the rest of the members. They are expected not to troll or spam threads and treat other members with respect. They can question and suggest changes and improvement on how TWC is run. They can vote on new laws and vote on select staff.

I think that I will fulfilled all the roles that a civitate requires. I have treated other members with respect. I think that I have contributed very well to this forum. I know I have had a prior waring and caution and I regret saying those things I said. The threads got really heated and things got out of control. I apologize for saying what I did. I would be very honored to become something more to this forum.

Now dont get all bent out of shape because of that warn 3 months ago. This member has caught my eye in the thema devia. He is a very entertaining member who, I see, gets involved rather well with this forum. I have had conversations and arguments a few times with this candidate and have enjoyed all of them. You know how my selections have turn out, well, all but one, and I am sure you can trust my judgement.

**Simetrical** · March 19, 2006, 03:56 PM

Hmm. He doesn't seem to post much of interest. He doesn't seem to flame now, but then, probably even AP and Hapsburg would be civil in the Babes Thread. When he does get into an actual argument, the results aren't terribly impressive: 1, 2. And then there's this.

I'm abstaining on this one.

**John I Tzimisces** · March 19, 2006, 04:21 PM

Eh. I don't feel very strongly on this one. The Force ain't strong with this one...

**imb39** · March 19, 2006, 07:23 PM

I looked at a random 20 odd posts and the vast majoirty were very short. He has a good sense of humour, I grant you. I'll vote against. I feel bad.

**Valus** · March 20, 2006, 01:46 AM

I just dont think he has the qualities I want for a civ

Edit: added my symphoties for sel

**Obi Wan Asterix** · March 20, 2006, 02:40 AM

Sorry Sel, I have had real problems recently with this one, he tests the limit of the babe's thread all the time ... no user notes because we caution him quite frequently. Furthermore I think he spammy and has a tendency for bad temper....

wish I did not have to vote no against your candidate

**Lusted** · March 20, 2006, 03:00 AM

No. Do not think he is of high enough quality.

**Tacticalwithdrawal** · March 20, 2006, 03:12 AM

I have to agree, I think he could become good but isn't at the moment.

**Fabolous** · March 20, 2006, 03:46 PM

Hrmm, I almosted voted for, he is quite... amusing. But overall not quite what I look for in a civ, somewhat spammy. I think he could be excellent with less spam, and more though out posts...