SH's New Map And Slower Expansion For SS6.4 (VERSION 0.3 OUT)

[Ichon]

Are you planning 1 one PSF per region or just in strategic locations or historical forts?

[Serbian Hussar]

I'm planing a couple of PSF per region. Depends on a region size. I'm not sure if it is better to stick with historical accuracy, or to make gameplay more interesting and put forts on roads to guard access to the settlements. Probably second.

[Bund weicher Birnen]

It's good .
I think Aragon should have only one starting position and some of the new regions should have roads like Verona.

[Serbian Hussar]

Yes, you are probably right. All those minor things should be ready 'till 1.0 release

[Boriempire]

are u going to add the permanent watchtowers to the mod?

[DampishDragon]

everytime i attmept to install this mod, it renders my game unplayable, if i select a faction on the main screen it will freeze , any ideas what is causing this.

[Serbian Hussar]

Yes. But adding PSF and watchtowers is a big work so don't expect it anytime soon

[Ichon]

Yes. But adding PSF and watchtowers is a big work so don't expect it anytime soon

If you can please do PSF first and then watchtowers second because I like PSF but hate having watchtowers included.

[Serbian Hussar]

Sure Btw, I've took you suggestion of putting a region in Caucasus. Rep is deserved. ...but it seems that I can't rep you now. I'll do it later.

[2Shy]

Great job !
But here is my sugestion- change Constanca with Drastar. Constanca was village but Drastar was city (and very important one).

[Serbian Hussar]

Thanks man, I'll change that.

[Serbian Hussar]

No idea. What does your log say? Do you get CTD? Remember it's not BGR compatable if you chose it in setup.
p.s. Maybe it's loading. The loading times are longer because of the new map. Is your pointer revolving? If it is, just wait.

[GiddeeUpp]

Very nice mod my friend, quite looking forward to testing it out.

[VINC.XXIII]

its time to add Raška
(personal view, though)

[Serbian Hussar]

its time to add Raška
(personal view, though)

Of course it is
I'll probably try to do it once I have a bit more free time

very nice I love it thank you so much =) I love how you can almost remake the Roman Empire but then at the same time have it be historically correct if you choose not to I love this thank you again plus rep you deserve it man =)

Thanks man, appreciate it

[codix105]

very nice I love it thank you so much =) I love how you can almost remake the Roman Empire but then at the same time have it be historically correct if you choose not to I love this thank you again plus rep you deserve it man =)

[Ichon]

Yeah so far yours and RWs are the best maps. Although without BGR I've only played 1 campaign on it so far. I have to admit Turin and Freisach bother me quite a bit. Freisach I can see balance wise though maybe there were other choices? But Turin... for 1100 I can't stand to play Genoa which is my favorite faction. =(

Everything else though is interesting and once the newest map project is completed I think there will be very interesting basis of 4 maps to compare and see what works.

[Serbian Hussar]

They are mainly here for balance. Although I could change them with Asti and Graz. Are those better in your opinion?

[Ichon]

They are mainly here for balance. Although I could change them with Asti and Graz. Are those better in your opinion?

Graz, Trieste, or Gorizia would be better I guess. What are they balancing for or against? The N Italians against HRE?

Turin is more difficult. It was actually important town as was Asti but it just seems crowded and politically they weren't widely relevant in 1100s. Later they were. It seems better to add Arles or something else from Kingdom of Arles or Burgundy more on the french side of the alps or even a Swiss area.

[GiddeeUpp]

Serb im really enjoying the updated map, it does make initial expansion much more difficult and important to plan your beginning moves carefully to avoid being run over. Good job!