Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Bollocks about Animal Welfare - Balls Off or STFU

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    sephodwyrm's Avatar Praefectus
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Taiwan
    Posts
    6,757

    Default Bollocks about Animal Welfare - Balls Off or STFU

    http://www.avma.org/reference/backgr...attle_bgnd.asp

    We castrate our cattle.
    We consider it necessary.
    It makes them fatten quicker, taste better and easier to control.

    Are we against it? No. Because it makes them fatten faster and taste better.
    Is it painful?

    See for yourself:
    Castration is considered to be one of the most stressful experiences for livestock.7,20,46 Blood cortisol concentrations have been studied as indicators of physiologic stress in animals. Regardless of the means of castration, cortisol concentrations are increased following the procedure; however, onset, magnitude, and duration may vary with the procedure used.4,13,17,37,46 Surgical castration appears to produce the most substantial rise in plasma cortisol concentration.3,6,17,32,46 Application of the Burdizzo clamp may also be associated with a similar, rapid rise in cortisol concentration due to the barrage of afferent neural impulses during and after crushing of the spermatic cord and scrotal nerves.13,17,47 Chase et al37 observed that plasma cortisol concentrations increased immediately after surgical castration; animals that were banded had cortisol increases of less initial intensity, but the concentrations were similar for both procedures on the second postoperative day. Salivary cortisol concentrations observed between 15 minutes and 2 hours after castration in 4- to 11-week-old calves undergoing surgery were much higher than those of calves castrated using rubber rings.20 Stafford46 observed similar overall cortisol responses for elastrator band, rubber ring, and surgical castration, but lower cortisol responses for castration using a Burdizzo clamp.
    Yeah, we try to minimize the pain. But I'm sure the Jews do too. Oh, in fact, they don't castrate their cattle.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutering#Judaism
    Unless they're pets.

    Bronze Age superstition.
    Animals should be neutered to make them taste better. Bollocks for me.
    Older guy on TWC.
    Done with National Service. NOT patriotic. MORE realist. Just gimme cash.
    Dishing out cheap shots since 2006.

  2. #2

    Default Re: Bollocks about Animal Welfare - Balls Off or STFU

    I've seen cattle being neutered and it doesn't bother them too much, they're sedated before hand, plus thereare delicious testicals to eat afterwards

  3. #3
    sephodwyrm's Avatar Praefectus
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Taiwan
    Posts
    6,757

    Default Re: Bollocks about Animal Welfare - Balls Off or STFU

    I've seen cattle being neutered and it doesn't bother them too much,
    Read the article.
    What it seems doesn't mean that they don't feel pain. Cattle tend not to have expressions on their faces.
    Older guy on TWC.
    Done with National Service. NOT patriotic. MORE realist. Just gimme cash.
    Dishing out cheap shots since 2006.

  4. #4

    Default Re: Bollocks about Animal Welfare - Balls Off or STFU

    But castration is necessary, as is death, but not stunning them prior to death isn't necessary.

  5. #5

    Default Re: Bollocks about Animal Welfare - Balls Off or STFU

    Quote Originally Posted by Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart View Post
    But castration is necessary, as is death, but not stunning them prior to death isn't necessary.
    woo hoo they feel pain

    nevermind overcorwded industrial farms

    as long as they are STUNNED before death, s'all good

  6. #6
    Ancient Aliens's Avatar Primicerius
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Incagualchepec, Guatemala
    Posts
    3,215

    Default Re: Bollocks about Animal Welfare - Balls Off or STFU

    ...Who cares?

    I don't really give a if cattle get their parts cut off to make them taste better, nor do I care about cattle. It's their fault for not being intelligent enough to protect themselves.

  7. #7
    sephodwyrm's Avatar Praefectus
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Taiwan
    Posts
    6,757

    Default Re: Bollocks about Animal Welfare - Balls Off or STFU

    But castration is necessary
    Bollocks. Having less cattle would simpy ameliorate the aggression problem of intact bulls. And we can live with the raging sex pheromone taste. It will put hair on our chest and muscle on our women.

    not stunning them prior to death isn't necessary.
    Bollocks.
    Stunning is just as bad.
    Do you know what is NOT necessary? Eating beef is not necessary.
    Older guy on TWC.
    Done with National Service. NOT patriotic. MORE realist. Just gimme cash.
    Dishing out cheap shots since 2006.

  8. #8
    Hotspur's Avatar I've got reach.
    Patrician

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Charlotte
    Posts
    11,982

    Default Re: Bollocks about Animal Welfare - Balls Off or STFU

    What is the purpose of this thread again?

  9. #9

    Default Re: Bollocks about Animal Welfare - Balls Off or STFU

    So should we eat pigs instead?

  10. #10
    sephodwyrm's Avatar Praefectus
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Taiwan
    Posts
    6,757

    Default Re: Bollocks about Animal Welfare - Balls Off or STFU

    It's their fault for not being intelligent enough to protect themselves.
    Right on.
    Guess who's doing the job of protecting these sorry animals.
    PEOPLE. Friggin undeserving naked simians called human beings who actually knew how to make tools and video games.

    So should we eat pigs instead?
    I'm afraid that many pigs are gelded as well.
    For prairie oysters.


    What is the purpose of this thread again?
    For people wanting to ban traditionalist kashrut that skips on the stunning part of slaughter.
    But feel alright about castrated bulls - bollocks, that's what they're called.
    Older guy on TWC.
    Done with National Service. NOT patriotic. MORE realist. Just gimme cash.
    Dishing out cheap shots since 2006.

  11. #11
    Vanoi's Avatar Dux Limitis
    Civitate

    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, USA
    Posts
    17,003

    Default Re: Bollocks about Animal Welfare - Balls Off or STFU

    Is this a "I feel bad about the poor animals getting their parts cut off" thread?

  12. #12
    sephodwyrm's Avatar Praefectus
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Taiwan
    Posts
    6,757

    Default Re: Bollocks about Animal Welfare - Balls Off or STFU

    Is this a "I feel bad about the poor animals getting their parts cut off" thread?
    No. It's a humor attempt at the other thread, where the Dutch wants to ban ritual slaughter (the lack of stunning in animal slaughter, to be precise).
    Older guy on TWC.
    Done with National Service. NOT patriotic. MORE realist. Just gimme cash.
    Dishing out cheap shots since 2006.

  13. #13
    John Doe's Avatar Primicerius
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    3,455

    Default Re: Bollocks about Animal Welfare - Balls Off or STFU

    Castration makes the animal meat fattier. Since it's sold by the kg, it's better financially. Also extra fat makes the meat tastier, most flavor carrying molecules are hydrophobic but disolve very well in fat. Fat also helps in the juicyness and tenderness of meats.

    Chapons are a french delicacy for xmas, basically it's a castrated cockerel.

    I'm all for it.

  14. #14
    Poach's Avatar Civitate
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    26,766

    Default Re: Bollocks about Animal Welfare - Balls Off or STFU

    Not political/Already a thread on the topic.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •