Let's assume no animals were harmed in the making of this post; and perhaps--one never knows--the animals even enjoyed it. Is bestiality still wrong in that situation?
http://www.goaskalice.columbia.edu/1056.html
Let's assume no animals were harmed in the making of this post; and perhaps--one never knows--the animals even enjoyed it. Is bestiality still wrong in that situation?
http://www.goaskalice.columbia.edu/1056.html
Last edited by DimeBagHo; June 16, 2011 at 12:35 AM. Reason: Requested
"Huh?"
On the flip side, an animal doesn't "kiss and tell," nor do her or his expectations "get in the way."
(Its clickable by the way....An S2 overhaul mod.)
Seriously. Click it. Its the only overhaul mod that's overhauling enough to bring out NEW clans
Masaie. Retainer of Akaie|AntonIII
Yes it is. Even if animals lack a brain and language that allows them to develop rationality, complex feelings and ideas they still have some instincts of fear and pain and suffer some ''traumas''. So raping animals is like raping retards who can't talk or communicate rationally. It's not cool![]()
Under the Patronage of Maximinus Thrax
Regarding the sex alone as in a isolated action yes, it's ok. Now if one of the parts was not considered rational enough, or some of the agreements happened under direct or indirect coercion, of if a third person would be directly harmed because of the action that's another thing, it's a contextual area where sex can be labeled as harmful.
The first clause however, is that both parties most be rationally and communicatively able to agree.
Under the Patronage of Maximinus Thrax
I'm pretty much obliged to just stop in and say hello, you know, just to give my critics lulz.
But I think it's bad, and dangerous! Remember that dude who died of impaction aftering a horse?
Let's get more academic.
Inter-species relationship do happen in wild, when both member of the different species are deprieved of potential mates. It may be possible that human and chimpanzee can breed and produce sterile hybrid offspring. It may be, although remotely slim, that such couple may possibly produce fertile hybrid offsprings. Sometimes new species emerge by this. However, this occurance is very slim. For example, there is no known documented cases of sexual interactions between feral childs and animals.
Why is it such a taboo? One speculate that it may be moral code embedded in either human society or even inside genes. For example, marriage between close relatives (for example, between brothers and sisters or parents and their offsprings) are strongly discouraged.
And do animals consent? Some species, such as ostrich, are known to court zookeepers during mating period if they are grown by humans. So, can we consider that ostrich is consenting? An interesting question.
The next sophomoric post in this thread will result its closure.
Sophomoric. =D
I'm personally against it for taste reasons even assuming consent could be brought into play.
The Earth is inhabited by billions of idiots.
The search for intelligent life continues...
Theres plenty of women in nite clubs gagging for it so why rape a sheep?I mean we are made to find people attractive not animals.Any mind that wants to do it with a horse etc needs serious physco therapy for many years. What is this word ?sophomoric
Quoting PETA (oh the irony), "If a girl gets sexual pleasure from riding a horse, does the horse suffer? If not, who cares? If you ride your dog and he or she thinks it's great, is it wrong? We believe all exploitation and abuse is wrong. If it isn't exploitation and abuse, [then] it may not be wrong.""
I guess other people who don't find women attractive also need mental help?
No i said people.Its normal to find people attractive.And i am not excluding gays.I do however exclude pedophiles and beastiality perpatrators..
Bestiality is legal in Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Hawaii, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Missouri, and more. I cant beleive this is legal
Last edited by John ''True Grit'' Wayne; June 18, 2011 at 06:27 AM.