Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Texas vs. TSA

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Texas vs. TSA

    Long and short of it is as follows.

    TSA: "We need to touch and fondle your junk in order to let you fly on our planes."

    Texas: " that, that's gay."

    TSA: "Well then no airplane travel for you."

    Texas: "...what?"

    http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/...74O54O20110525

    (Reuters) - A controversial proposal to criminalize "enhanced pat-downs" at Texas airports stalled in the state senate late on Tuesday night, following a lobbying effort against it by the federal government.

    State Senator Dan Patrick, a Houston Republican, had said he had enough support to win approval of the measure, which would have called for Transportation Security Administration agents to be charged with misdemeanor sexual harassment for what the bill calls 'intrusive touching,' a crime that carries a penalty of up to a year in jail.

    The bill described 'intrusive touching' as touching a passenger's sexual organs, or 'touching in a manner that would be offensive to a reasonable person.'

    But after John Murphy, United States Attorney for the Western District of Texas, circulated a letter threatening to cancel flights out of Texas if the law passed, Patrick saw support for the measure rapidly vanish.

    When Patrick found he no longer had the two thirds majority of the senate required under the rules to debate a bill on the floor, he pulled it from consideration. With the legislature set to adjourn on Monday, the proposal looks dead for the current session.

    Murphy had written that: "The proposed legislation would criminalize searches that are required under federal regulations in order to ensure the safety of the American public."
    I'm pretty sure that what the TSA is threatening to do is unconstitutional, though I could be wrong. But I do know that it does go against some federal laws concerning travel, or something along those lines.

  2. #2
    xcorps's Avatar Praefectus
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Missouri, US
    Posts
    6,916

    Default Re: Texas vs. TSA

    "Every idea is an incitement. It offers itself for belief and if believed it is acted on unless some other belief outweighs it or some failure of energy stifles the movement at its birth. The only difference between the expression of an opinion and an incitement in the narrower sense is the speaker's enthusiasm for the result. Eloquence may set fire to reason." -Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.

  3. #3
    YuriVII's Avatar Primicerius
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Texian Cossack Hetmanate
    Posts
    3,007

    Default Re: Texas vs. TSA

    Give em hell Texas.

    Stupid US Attorney in Western District. There needs to be a mob to run him out of town.

  4. #4

    Default Re: Texas vs. TSA

    Didn't this all start because of this nut head?


  5. #5

    Default Re: Texas vs. TSA

    Quote Originally Posted by Faaip de Oiad View Post
    Didn't this all start because of this nut head?

    No, the national Enquierer of the inter-webs is pretty much just a fat slob looking to get pings on his web site to send his advertisment count up and make money.

    Micheal Moore, Alex Jones, and a slew of other, "Lets talk crazy talk cause the 1% of psychos will listen and feed us more cheezburgers" crowd should be... Well, lets just say Boston had the right idea with 425 degree molten tar, corrupt public servents, and a bag of feathers at the end.

  6. #6
    HissingNewt's Avatar Vicarius
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    2,841

    Default Re: Texas vs. TSA

    Well that's interesting. I just noticed a sign for Dan Patrick's office five minutes from where I live yesterday. Anyways, I support this. The TSA is getting too invasive in their searches.
    "Hullabaloo, caneck! Caneck!"

  7. #7
    Indefinitely Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    21,467

    Default Re: Texas vs. TSA

    what's so good about texans that their junk needs fondling?

  8. #8
    sdjenkyn's Avatar Campidoctor
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,514

    Default Re: Texas vs. TSA

    Size....everythings big in Texas

  9. #9
    boofhead's Avatar Dux Limitis
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Mining Country, Outback Australia.
    Posts
    19,332

    Default Re: Texas vs. TSA

    But there needs to be exceptions to the rules. Arabs in funny hats must have their balls fondled.

  10. #10

    Default Re: Texas vs. TSA

    Quote Originally Posted by boofhead View Post
    But there needs to be exceptions to the rules. Arabs in funny hats must have their balls fondled.
    as is tradition

  11. #11

    Default Re: Texas vs. TSA

    It was absolutely unacceptable one of the security guard "fondled" a young girl for "security."

    I guess I ain't bringing my gf to US!

  12. #12
    Imperial's Avatar Primicerius
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Florida, US (wang of America)
    Posts
    3,838

    Default Re: Texas vs. TSA

    Quote Originally Posted by leeho730 View Post
    It was absolutely unacceptable one of the security guard "fondled" a young girl for "security."

    I guess I ain't bringing my gf to US!
    They have women TSA agents that are the ones that fondle the female junk. However, none of them are attractive, and it ruins our viewing pleasure.


  13. #13

    Default Re: Texas vs. TSA

    Quote Originally Posted by Imperial View Post
    They have women TSA agents that are the ones that fondle the female junk. However, none of them are attractive, and it ruins our viewing pleasure.

    Darn!!!!

  14. #14
    Seether's Avatar RoTK Workhorse
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    FloRida
    Posts
    5,393

    Default Re: Texas vs. TSA

    I normally hate... pretty much everything about Texas, but I have to say that I am sympathetic to the idea of the bill. The invasive pat downs (technically it is a search) are stupid and come from this "anyone can be a terrorist mentality" that has plagued America since 9/11. Don't get me wrong, stricter guidelines need to be enacted than what were in place prior to 9/11, but they need to be intelligent, efficient, effective, and necessary guidelines. One time when flying, my 1 year old daughter had on those cheap foam-rubber sandals and they made me take them off her to be scanned. How stupid is that? Think about how little material those crappy toddler sandals have. How the could you ever turn that into a bomb or weapon? Seriously, the TSA is getting out of control with this stuff...
    Member of the Imperial House of Hader - Under the Benevolent Patronage of y2day
    A Wolf Among Sheep: A Rise of Three Kingdoms AAR

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •