Bet u didnt know about Saw this before about 9/11

[Darkragnar]

http://www.jokaroo.com/ecards/funny/...tagonlies.html
What do u people think about his video?, i certainly didnt know somethings shown in this video.
can this be part true ?

[GambleFish]

there's a reason it's called "jokaroo.com/ecards/funny"

It's a joke...

[purple elf]

that conspiracy theory that the pentagon was hit by a missile has been foating about for yonks though it is suspicious that no wreckage was found

[Skyhigh]

there's a reason it's called "jokaroo.com/ecards/funny"

It's a joke...

its on other sites too
no one would treat that as a joke

unless they are osama

[QuackyNC]

So why exactly would the US goverment fire a missle at its military headquarters?

[rez]

That was a real eye opener, im waiting to hear from the conservatives on how it was lies.

But until then im awed - the overwhelming amount of evidence is stunning

[QuackyNC]

That was a real eye opener, im waiting to hear from the conservatives on how it was lies.

But until then im awed - the overwhelming amount of evidence is stunning

You actually think that this has any truth behind it. Why would the US goverment attack its own people? What happened to the plane if it didnt hit the building? And how many people know what happens when a fully fueled boeing 747 does when it hits a building?

[hsimoorb]

That was complete and utter hogwash. That wasn't evidence, that was pure speculation plus some "eyewitness accounts" Do I need to remind you how inaccurate eyewitnesses can be? They're basing thier arguments on how well these people know civilian and military aircraft. There are the same people who claim meteorites "look like spacecraft".

[Skyhigh]

it sounds dumb, yes
but it hit a part that was specially renovated to withstand massive impact
also the towers were hit first, so maybe the gov't used the situation and hit thier own headquarters (at a very unimportant part too) to heighten the politcal power that they would have afterwords

cuz they've been itching to hit iraq since before 9/11


http://video.google.com/videoplay?d...&q=loose+change
this is even more of an eye opener

[QuackyNC]

it sounds dumb, yes
but it hit a part that was specially renovated to withstand massive impact
also the towers were hit first, so maybe the gov't used the situation and hit thier own headquarters (at a very unimportant part too) to heighten the politcal power that they would have afterwords

cuz they've been itching to hit iraq since before 9/11


http://video.google.com/videoplay?d...&q=loose+change
this is even more of an eye opener

The goverment needed more "political power" after the two largest buildings in its countries were hit by airplanes and eventually fell killing 3000 people? Are you listening to yourself?

you seem to have blind trust in the government

You seem to have blind ignorance. What reason would the US goverment have for attacking its military headquarters, please tell me.

[Darkragnar]

I see people are really openianated on this.
I guess this video is made by conspiracy nuts after all, I checked the following site,sent to me by Knight_Yellow and found out that the people who made this video left a lot of evidence out just because it didnt fit into there idea.

http://www.popularmechanics.com/scie...tml?page=6&c=y

[Skyhigh]

You actually think that this has any truth behind it. Why would the US goverment attack its own people? What happened to the plane if it didnt hit the building? And how many people know what happens when a fully fueled boeing 747 does when it hits a building?

you seem to have blind trust in the government
how is it inconcievable that any government would attack its own people ?

[rez]

Well i think some people have the idea that a fully fueld boeing 757 might have left at least some wings behind on the outside. Look at the impact crater in the pentagon. it is quite clear that the wings would have been shorn off. Where were they?

Not to mention the government mentioned severe fire damage but no fuel explosion. Why would they confiscate film? why did the craft behave like a military plane on radar? and how could the no hope pilots fly such a craft?

oh and of course the height of the plane coming in is disputed by the governmet and photographic evidence. and the lack of damage to the lawn

[QuackyNC]

Well i think some people have the idea that a fully fueld boeing 757 might have left at least some wings behind on the outside. Look at the impact crater in the pentagon. it is quite clear that the wings would have been shorn off. Where were they?

Not to mention the government mentioned severe fire damage but no fuel explosion. Why would they confiscate film? why did the craft behave like a military plane on radar? and how could the no hope pilots fly such a craft?

oh and of course the height of the plane coming in is disputed by the governmet and photographic evidence. and the lack of damage to the lawn

Well if it didnt crash into the pentagon what happened to that particular flight, did the goverment shoot it down?

[DR. Hobo. PHD.]

Well i think some people have the idea that a fully fueld boeing 757 might have left at least some wings behind on the outside. Look at the impact crater in the pentagon. it is quite clear that the wings would have been shorn off. Where were they?

Not to mention the government mentioned severe fire damage but no fuel explosion. Why would they confiscate film? why did the craft behave like a military plane on radar? and how could the no hope pilots fly such a craft?

oh and of course the height of the plane coming in is disputed by the governmet and photographic evidence. and the lack of damage to the lawn

what about the video of the plane crashin into the pentagon at less than 45 degree angle?
it was from paking lot security i belive
the fire is easy to explain, because jet fuel is highly flammible and exploded during impact.
keep in mind this plane was bound for a cross country trip so it was well loaded with fuel.
no wreckage is easy to explain to, as it was first pulverised at 580mph(not sure on that number though :sweatingb )then exploded at the same time cause the jet fuel ignighting, the the pentigon colapsing on itself.

look at the trade center, ther was a little of the planes found but that was cause most of the jet fuel went down the elevator shafts, bringing the two towers down.....( damn those terrorist )

[Xasha]

heh thoose kinda theories alsways comes up, even if they had 200 movies of the plane hitting Pentagon, there would still be some people claim othervise.

It is just funny that they can get others to belive the same.

Simple fact plane hit pentagon, case closed.

[rez]

"Do I need to remind you how inaccurate eyewitnesses can be? They're basing thier arguments on how well these people know civilian and military aircraft. There are the same people who claim meteorites "look like spacecraft"." - and the airtraffic controllers?

If the government was willing to blow a hole in its own defense institutions killing their own staff, it seems possible they would bring down civillians.

i dont want to believe bush did this-
and I am willing to change my opinion quite easily i would just like to hear some good evidence against the bizzare pattern of damage to the pentagon and a plane that vanished

[QuackyNC]

i dont want to believe bush did this-
and I am willing to change my opinion quite easily i would just like to hear some good evidence against the bizzare pattern of damage to the pentagon and a plane that vanished

Some evidence okay, you won statement provides the most conclusive evidence, "A plane that vanished."

1. If flight 77 didnt crash into the pentagon then where is it at? Where are the people that died on it?

2. That section of the pentagon had recently been reinforced, that could explain the lack of damage to it.

3. No one has tested to see what happens when a fully fueled boeing 747 crashes into a building.

4. About the planes wings you can clearly see damage on the building caused by the wings, and the wings werent in tact laying on the lawn maybe beacause the struck a freaking building. How much of the plane do you expect to be left. The wings more than liely folded into the fusalage after the impact and were carried into the building.



Notice the blackened sections on the each edge of the impact.

[GambleFish]

Some evidence okay, you won statement provides the most conclusive evidence, "A plane that vanished."

1. If flight 77 didnt crash into the pentagon then where is it at? Where are the people that died on it?

2. That section of the pentagon had recently been reinforced, that could explain the lack of damage to it.

3. No one has tested to see what happens when a fully fueled boeing 747 crashes into a building.

4. About the planes wings you can clearly see damage on the building caused by the wings, and the wings werent in tact laying on the lawn maybe beacause the struck a freaking building. How much of the plane do you expect to be left. The wings more than liely folded into the fusalage after the impact and were carried into the building.



Notice the blackened sections on the each edge of the impact.

That about sums it up.

The original poster said he visited a critic's site or something and that a lot of evidence was left out because it didnt fit the theory.

The simplest explanation is usually the truest.

[Skyhigh]

"Do I need to remind you how inaccurate eyewitnesses can be? They're basing thier arguments on how well these people know civilian and military aircraft. There are the same people who claim meteorites "look like spacecraft"." - and the airtraffic controllers?

If the government was willing to blow a hole in its own defense institutions killing their own staff, it seems possible they would bring down civillians.

i dont want to believe bush did this-
and I am willing to change my opinion quite easily i would just like to hear some good evidence against the bizzare pattern of damage to the pentagon and a plane that vanished

a lot of these eyewitnesses would have work at the pentagon, the MILITARY HEADQUARTERS!
i'm sure that at least half of them knew what they were talking about


http://img405.imageshack.us/my.php?...untitled9jr.png
then where did the fuselage hit, how come you cant see it? where are the wings, what was that box with a tarp??? hmmmmm
at least at the trade towers there were distict plane shaped marks, this is just not condusive to an airplane