divine wind vs magma mundi

[Eneru112]

which is better and why?

[Hobbes]

It's Magna Mundi (which doesn't make sense in Latin, anyway). I would go with MM it offers much more, it's also free!

[Eneru112]

They need to update it for divine wind

[Salem1]

Magna Mundi. I haven't even played Divine Wind but I know MM would still beat the tar out of it. Why? it's like the difference between a more complete and a less complete game. MM adds depth, challenge, interesting stuff... it's still got its glaring flaws but those are leftovers from vanilla and can't be fixed with a mere mod, which is why they are making MM into a game. Vanilla on the other hand pretty much is a glaring flaw, if it wasn't for MM I wouldn't have played EU3 for more than a week (none too pleased with the experience might I add).

By ubik's word the most balanced version is MM2 which doesn't use the HttT expansion while MMU does but isn't as balanced. Personally I think MMU > MM2 because there's more content.

If you're looking for the baseline, MM is a grand strategy game whereas vanilla is risk with toys.

[Eneru112]

There's a lot of content that's for sure, but see divine wind has that cool map similar to victoria 2 which I cannot do without. Damn victoria ruined old paradox games for me T_T

Except hoi2, somehow it still manages to look decent

[Salem1]

Except hoi2, somehow it still manages to look decent

If there's one thing I like about hoi2 it's the sound that navies make when you select them. It's just so good... DRRRDRRRR-DUNK!