Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: Bottleneck or not ?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Bottleneck or not ?

    i've run today windows 7 performance thing and i got this:

    processor: 7,5
    memory (ram): 7,5
    graphics; 7,9
    graphics (games): 7,9
    HDD: 5,8

    is my HDD bottlenecking my desktop performance (in special for gamming)? should i get a new HDD ?

    if so would be WESTERN DIGITAL CAVIAR BLACK 1TB 64MB SATAIII (6GB/S) a good choice for new hdd?

    need help please
    Common sense removed due being Disruptive.

  2. #2
    Nota''s Avatar Campidoctor
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,976

    Default Re: Bottleneck or not ?

    Not really unless you are having problems with loading times. Thats a good HD, you could only really improve with a super high speed (~10000RPM) one, RAID, or SSD.

  3. #3
    Crazyeyesreaper's Avatar Primicerius
    Citizen

    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Maine, United States
    Posts
    3,287

    Default Re: Bottleneck or not ?

    Windows Experience Index is usless garbage, all HDDs will score low and all SSDs will score high,

    hdd only impacts loading and install speeds for the most part unless you have little ram and the HDD gets used as a page file,
    otherwise no it dosent impact performance at all
    if you really want a larger HDD, samsung F3 1TB is the best for the price usually $20-30 cheaper then westerndigital and slightly faster, and before you say its not SATA III, that has 0 impact on performance unless dealing with SSD drives.

    To wrap things up
    Windows Experience Index score is usless
    a new hdd wont improve gaming performance
    the only reason to get an hdd is for more space
    10,000rpm raptor drives have faster access times but are slower then modern 1tb drives in terms of read write performance
    Samsung F3 1tb = fastest 1TB drive currently available and cheapest as well.
    CPU: i7 3770K 4.6GHz / i7 4930K 4.4 GHz / i7 4770K 4.6 GHz
    CPU HSF: Thermaltake Water 2.0 Pro / Review Samples / Review Samples
    MOBO: Biostar TZ77XE4 / ASRock X79 Fatal1ty Champion / MSI Z87 GD65 Gaming
    RAM: Mushkin Redlines 2x4GB 1866 MHz / 4x4GB Gskill 2133 MHz / 2x4GB Kingston 2400 MHz
    GPU: Integrated / GTX 780 / HD 5450 Passive
    PSU: Thermaltake Toughpower Grand 1050w 80+ GOLD / NZXT Hale82 650w Modular / same
    CASE: Nanoxia DS1 / Nanoxia DS1 / Lian Li Test Bench
    HDD: 160 HDD / 512GB SSD + 120GB SSD + 5.5TB HDD / 60gb SSD

  4. #4

    Default Re: Bottleneck or not ?

    Quote Originally Posted by [100]jplay.TGC View Post
    Not really unless you are having problems with loading times. Thats a good HD, you could only really improve with a super high speed (~10000RPM) one, RAID, or SSD.
    well loading times doesnt bother me much more 10seconds more 10 seconds isnt a big deal to me. i'm only focus ingame performance.

    Quote Originally Posted by Crazyeyesreaper View Post
    Windows Experience Index is usless garbage, all HDDs will score low and all SSDs will score high,

    hdd only impacts loading and install speeds for the most part unless you have little ram and the HDD gets used as a page file,
    otherwise no it dosent impact performance at all
    if you really want a larger HDD, samsung F3 1TB is the best for the price usually $20-30 cheaper then westerndigital and slightly faster, and before you say its not SATA III, that has 0 impact on performance unless dealing with SSD drives.

    To wrap things up
    Windows Experience Index score is usless
    a new hdd wont improve gaming performance
    the only reason to get an hdd is for more space
    10,000rpm raptor drives have faster access times but are slower then modern 1tb drives in terms of read write performance
    Samsung F3 1tb = fastest 1TB drive currently available and cheapest as well.
    thanks, that was a very clarifying reply

    so on this case i may just buy some cheap hdd just for the extra space sake
    Common sense removed due being Disruptive.

  5. #5
    Nota''s Avatar Campidoctor
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,976

    Default Re: Bottleneck or not ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ataegina View Post
    so on this case i may just buy some cheap hdd just for the extra space sake
    Caviar greens make decent storage drives, low power and heat etc, but not good for gaming at all. Keep the games on your current faster drive.

  6. #6

    Default Re: Bottleneck or not ?

    i'm aiming for minimum of 500gb/32mb cache/7200rpm. this is my current bar for hdd, this specs or better but never less
    Common sense removed due being Disruptive.

  7. #7
    Crazyeyesreaper's Avatar Primicerius
    Citizen

    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Maine, United States
    Posts
    3,287

    Default Re: Bottleneck or not ?

    just grab a Samsung F3 1tb there usually $69 usd, Caviar Green is $64 you pay $5 more and you get essentially the fastest 1TB drive still available, Caviar blacks depending on which variation or platter density are the same speed or slower at nearly $20 higher at $89,

    so $69 vs 89 on the fastest 1tb choice

    $69 fastest $64 for the slowest, dropping from a 1tb Samsung F3 to say a 500gb caviar blue only saves $15 usd. not really worth the saving at half the capacity and about 20% slower overall
    CPU: i7 3770K 4.6GHz / i7 4930K 4.4 GHz / i7 4770K 4.6 GHz
    CPU HSF: Thermaltake Water 2.0 Pro / Review Samples / Review Samples
    MOBO: Biostar TZ77XE4 / ASRock X79 Fatal1ty Champion / MSI Z87 GD65 Gaming
    RAM: Mushkin Redlines 2x4GB 1866 MHz / 4x4GB Gskill 2133 MHz / 2x4GB Kingston 2400 MHz
    GPU: Integrated / GTX 780 / HD 5450 Passive
    PSU: Thermaltake Toughpower Grand 1050w 80+ GOLD / NZXT Hale82 650w Modular / same
    CASE: Nanoxia DS1 / Nanoxia DS1 / Lian Li Test Bench
    HDD: 160 HDD / 512GB SSD + 120GB SSD + 5.5TB HDD / 60gb SSD

  8. #8
    Nota''s Avatar Campidoctor
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,976

    Default Re: Bottleneck or not ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Crazyeyesreaper View Post
    just grab a Samsung F3 1tb there usually $69 usd, Caviar Green is $64 you pay $5 more and you get essentially the fastest 1TB drive still available, Caviar blacks depending on which variation or platter density are the same speed or slower at nearly $20 higher at $89,

    so $69 vs 89 on the fastest 1tb choice

    $69 fastest $64 for the slowest, dropping from a 1tb Samsung F3 to say a 500gb caviar blue only saves $15 usd. not really worth the saving at half the capacity and about 20% slower overall
    May I ask why you have a 500GB WD HD on your sig rig? Salvage from a past machine?

    Edit: That said this was the only 2TB drive with your other min specs (from that company), if its lots of space you want.
    Last edited by Nota'; May 08, 2011 at 04:28 PM.

  9. #9
    Nota''s Avatar Campidoctor
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,976

    Default Re: Bottleneck or not ?

    Yerp, I would have advised that but the OP said he wanted 7200RPM. Would help if he said what the drive was for (i assume storage). That said he never asked for my help
    Last edited by Nota'; May 08, 2011 at 04:37 PM.

  10. #10

    Default Re: Bottleneck or not ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Crazyeyesreaper View Post
    just grab a Samsung F3 1tb there usually $69 usd, Caviar Green is $64 you pay $5 more and you get essentially the fastest 1TB drive still available, Caviar blacks depending on which variation or platter density are the same speed or slower at nearly $20 higher at $89,

    so $69 vs 89 on the fastest 1tb choice

    $69 fastest $64 for the slowest, dropping from a 1tb Samsung F3 to say a 500gb caviar blue only saves $15 usd. not really worth the saving at half the capacity and about 20% slower overall
    I have 2 RAID 1 Samsung F3 and has zero problems with them, very quiet. I wouldnt trust any capactiy higher than that, too many errors and failures right now.
    Create a Multiplayer Army Online at: www.shogun2armycreator.netne.net
    Your Unofficial Shogun 2 Tech Support Genius
    Visit my Youtube Channel
    Shogun 2 and Star Wars: The Old Republic Gameplay

    http://www.youtube.com/itsmymillertime

  11. #11
    Crazyeyesreaper's Avatar Primicerius
    Citizen

    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Maine, United States
    Posts
    3,287

    Default Re: Bottleneck or not ?

    yes its a very very very very very old 500gb drive it was manufacturered in 2005 bought it when 500gb drives were stil around $125-135 usd lol.

    and wow

    http://www.microdirect.co.uk/Home/Pr...5-inch-5400rpm

    samsung F4 2tb low power drive nearly half price compared to WD i didnt think the price difference would be that large in the UK
    CPU: i7 3770K 4.6GHz / i7 4930K 4.4 GHz / i7 4770K 4.6 GHz
    CPU HSF: Thermaltake Water 2.0 Pro / Review Samples / Review Samples
    MOBO: Biostar TZ77XE4 / ASRock X79 Fatal1ty Champion / MSI Z87 GD65 Gaming
    RAM: Mushkin Redlines 2x4GB 1866 MHz / 4x4GB Gskill 2133 MHz / 2x4GB Kingston 2400 MHz
    GPU: Integrated / GTX 780 / HD 5450 Passive
    PSU: Thermaltake Toughpower Grand 1050w 80+ GOLD / NZXT Hale82 650w Modular / same
    CASE: Nanoxia DS1 / Nanoxia DS1 / Lian Li Test Bench
    HDD: 160 HDD / 512GB SSD + 120GB SSD + 5.5TB HDD / 60gb SSD

  12. #12
    Crazyeyesreaper's Avatar Primicerius
    Citizen

    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Maine, United States
    Posts
    3,287

    Default Re: Bottleneck or not ?

    lol all we can do is give a person options that best fit what they need. everyones opinion is different, granted i own HDDs from just about every company there is and honestly dont care what i use i just go for best price / performance / gb offered, since in reality most hdds will be so close performance wise in each performance bracket it dosent matter what a person grabs.
    CPU: i7 3770K 4.6GHz / i7 4930K 4.4 GHz / i7 4770K 4.6 GHz
    CPU HSF: Thermaltake Water 2.0 Pro / Review Samples / Review Samples
    MOBO: Biostar TZ77XE4 / ASRock X79 Fatal1ty Champion / MSI Z87 GD65 Gaming
    RAM: Mushkin Redlines 2x4GB 1866 MHz / 4x4GB Gskill 2133 MHz / 2x4GB Kingston 2400 MHz
    GPU: Integrated / GTX 780 / HD 5450 Passive
    PSU: Thermaltake Toughpower Grand 1050w 80+ GOLD / NZXT Hale82 650w Modular / same
    CASE: Nanoxia DS1 / Nanoxia DS1 / Lian Li Test Bench
    HDD: 160 HDD / 512GB SSD + 120GB SSD + 5.5TB HDD / 60gb SSD

  13. #13

    Default Re: Bottleneck or not ?

    well the thing left from my original desktop is the HDD,DVD-R. so my HDD is the same of origin seagate barracuda...... 3-4years old o.O very noisy.........
    Common sense removed due being Disruptive.

  14. #14
    Crazyeyesreaper's Avatar Primicerius
    Citizen

    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Maine, United States
    Posts
    3,287

    Default Re: Bottleneck or not ?

    yea samsung F3 is pretty much fastest quietest 1tb drive on the market and at its price range, so if you want a newer faster hdd its the 1 to grab, especially since there not being made anymore, Seagate bought Samsungs HDD division meaning all the awesomeness is gone,

    fastest low capacity hdd is the Samsung F4 320gb, at near 150-160mb/s read write no drive comes close and the 1tb F3 is the fastest 1tb currently and dirt cheap, Western digital will take the lead again by the end of the year since seagate has to absorb the new tech and put it to use. So if you need cheap capacity 2tb F4 if you need cheap capacity and speed F3 1tb, need a fast boot drive thats cheap 320gb F4 7200rpm
    CPU: i7 3770K 4.6GHz / i7 4930K 4.4 GHz / i7 4770K 4.6 GHz
    CPU HSF: Thermaltake Water 2.0 Pro / Review Samples / Review Samples
    MOBO: Biostar TZ77XE4 / ASRock X79 Fatal1ty Champion / MSI Z87 GD65 Gaming
    RAM: Mushkin Redlines 2x4GB 1866 MHz / 4x4GB Gskill 2133 MHz / 2x4GB Kingston 2400 MHz
    GPU: Integrated / GTX 780 / HD 5450 Passive
    PSU: Thermaltake Toughpower Grand 1050w 80+ GOLD / NZXT Hale82 650w Modular / same
    CASE: Nanoxia DS1 / Nanoxia DS1 / Lian Li Test Bench
    HDD: 160 HDD / 512GB SSD + 120GB SSD + 5.5TB HDD / 60gb SSD

  15. #15
    ♔KillZoneGB♔'s Avatar Ducenarius
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Gloucester UK
    Posts
    939

    Icon14 Re: Bottleneck or not ?

    for gaming

    Example


    may i suggest in shutting down all the bloatware @ the start up.
    IE disable tablet, Nvidia`s 3d graphic drivers (keep aero running)

    Ideal would be to aim for 40 ish Processes
    (one settled from cold boot up, firewall and security programs still running)

    Appearance
    Does this really matter?

    Well to some it does, then there others, that just don`t care.
    For me i fall into the latter, manly because i like to use the fastest part of the memory,
    hence all the fancy aero stuff to basic, no sounds, god i`m boring hehe



    Hard Drive
    try to keep you files together, a un optimized HDD can often cost you 20fps on average, worst case scenario stuttering and incresed loading times.

    Clean, consolidate HDD, install the game then consolidate again for good measure.

    Regarding patches
    Best to unistall, consolidate, install game, add patch then consolidate.
    (have the patch on a separate HDD/USB memory Stick,DVD)

    32bit applications on a 64bit o/s

    Maybe create a 1gig ram drive and tell windows to use the page file on the Ram Drive.
    fix for 32 bit applications running over 3.5gig (including gpu memory)


    If you want to trim the system down even further. (note for anyone)

    goto the bios settings, and shut down port that will never be used.

    IE Com ports,(old serial printer ports RS232) (most likely you use a USB port?)

    Note for Wireless systems.
    you can disable the Lan Port, only if you have set up your wireless beforehand

    If you have to install wireless drivers, you will need to enable the Lan port.


    cant wait for my upgrade

    Footnote
    What`s the point in using valuable cpu cycles,if you don't use em and all that

    Anyhoo that`s old skool console way of gaming.

    This should put a spring in your fps and I/O devices
    Last edited by ♔KillZoneGB♔; May 09, 2011 at 08:44 AM.
    System
    OS: Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit (TBA Win7 Prof)
    Processor: i7 4820K Ivy E @ 4.4Ghz (Mild OC), MB Sabertooth X79
    Memory: Kingston HyperX Fury Red 16GB DDR3-1600 Dual Kit (TBA to 64GB Quad 8X8GB)
    GPU: NVIDIA GTX 670 Phantom (TBA SLI Nvida xxx)
    Water Cooled


  16. #16

    Default Re: Bottleneck or not ?

    i've found some cheap samsung f3 1 tb but this is 16mb cache, how can it be faster than 32-64 cache hdd's ?
    Common sense removed due being Disruptive.

  17. #17

    Default Re: Bottleneck or not ?

    Quote Originally Posted by ♔KillZoneGB♔ View Post
    a un optimized HDD can often cost you 20fps on average
    So an "unoptimized" hard drive is going to cost me 20 fps in Crysis? I'm sorry but that's just false information.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ataegina View Post
    i've found some cheap samsung f3 1 tb but this is 16mb cache, how can it be faster than 32-64 cache hdd's ?
    As far as I know Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB drives have 32MB caches.


  18. #18

    Default Re: Bottleneck or not ?

    yes thats correct, my apologies. i've confused with the 500gb wich is 16mb, the 1tb is 32mb like you said
    Common sense removed due being Disruptive.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •