-
May 04, 2011, 07:53 PM
#1
Laetus
Ghazni/Ghorid positions in 2.3
Hello. I'm sorry if this has been answered but I didn't see any threads about it so I decided to register for the forums because I was really curious.
Why did the Ghaznis and the Ghorids have their positions from 2.02 switched for 2.3? I don't understand why their starting regions have been exchanged. I mean, how can they be the Sultanate of Ghazni if they don't even have Ghazni anymore? I'd be very grateful if anyone can explain the reasons behind it.
And thank you to the dedicated people who work on BC. It's a real pleasure to play such a great mod.
-
May 04, 2011, 08:39 PM
#2
Laetus
Re: Ghazni/Ghorid positions in 2.3
different beginning year ( slightly earlier timeframe) ((i think))
-
May 04, 2011, 09:05 PM
#3
Re: Ghazni/Ghorid positions in 2.3
What steaky said. The political borders seem to have been redone to be more correct. In 1173 the Ghorids took Ghazni, and since the mod takes place in 1174 the political borders have been readjusted.
-
May 05, 2011, 01:24 AM
#4
Re: Ghazni/Ghorid positions in 2.3
Yep, in 1170's Ghaznavids were pushed into their Punjab possessions by Ghurids, and in 1180's Ghurids killed last Ghaznavid sultan.
And they are not called "Sultanate of Ghazni" anymore, but "The Ghaznavids".
-
May 05, 2011, 05:57 PM
#5
Laetus
Re: Ghazni/Ghorid positions in 2.3
Ah, thank you. The level of research you do on this stuff is impressive. I'm glad to know there was some historical context behind the switch.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules