You can edit the title by double clicking it in VV main page.
To OP, I have an alternative view : were Bonn and East Berlin governements traitors as they were obedient to the West respectively East blocks, instead of pursuing a nationalist German policy.
Of course, the comparaison is a little bit streched.
Vichy was a solution for France, the best compromise given the conditions - remember, there was no hope to reverse German victory back then, US were in their splendid isolation, Britain barely held on her own and USSR were accomplices to Hitler. So the French had to save what they could. Of course they could have fought from colonies, but wat was the point as France proper was at the mercy of Hitler, and lets remember Hitler envisaged the genocide of nations like Poland, he could do the same with France, to kill all French elites, to destroy all French culture, etc. What good if in the end Allies won if there was nothing left of France. What I apreciate about the French is their pragmatism in wars : they were many times capable to compromises knowing no defeat is final. I prefer a surrender Vichy type then fanaticism and fighting to the bitter end as Germany did in 1944-45 with dire consequences for German nation- human, territorial, material, political, etc. In the course of history the French knew how to win but also how to lose, and knowing how to lose is as important, as you can win many times but to lose once and for all.
As for Vichy France, they did a dirty and dishonourable charge, someone had to do it, and of course they had to pay for it; it was a loose-loose situation. For their part in Holocaust it was deserved. For the part in colaboration - well the commution of death penalty for Petains says a lot.