FAILED: Gogoas for Civitates (Patron: Farnan)

**Søren** · February 18, 2006, 12:29 PM

Gogoas

Originally Posted by Farnan

Gogoas has proven himself a very contributing member of the community here at TWC. His posts in the Vestigia Vetustatis and Political Mudpit have shown him to be an intelligent person who is able to debate with proficiency. His exemplary knowledge, good character, and willigness to debate makes him a very deserving candidate for the title of Civitate.

Originally Posted by Gogoas

For me I'm simple man who first came to this forum because of my interest in rome:total war and battle tactics and strategy. It didn't take long for me long before I discovered the Thema Devia and Vestigia Vetustatis sections of the forum where I visit every single day to see if I could somehow contribute some of my information to help benefit other, while also receive response from other who'll agree, add more, or try to counter point some of posts. This is a very rare chance for me to have an intelligent conversation (or debate) with other people from all over the world. Of course I don't stray too far from the total war community forums as I do regularly play total war games (maybe a little too much for my own good ) and am interested in developments in the game and it's respective mods. I come everyday and will be contributing for as long as the total war center has it's forum.

----

NOTE : His second user note is apparently a positive one. His 1st was perhaps a litle over zealous of the mod in question.

**Torment** · February 18, 2006, 12:58 PM

Unexpired usernote, lot's of oneliners, I'm going to vote no on this one. He does have potential though, he just needs to put a stop on the oneliners.

**Justinian** · February 18, 2006, 01:16 PM

Torment,

You can't really rule this one out on the basis of an unexpired user note, since it's a caution and cautions don't expire. Besides, I think it's very overzealous to give even a caution for censor "bypass" (when apparently he was censoring himself).

**Torment** · February 18, 2006, 01:53 PM

Originally Posted by Justinian

Torment,

You can't really rule this one out on the basis of an unexpired user note, since it's a caution and cautions don't expire. Besides, I think it's very overzealous to give even a caution for censor "bypass" (when apparently he was censoring himself).

Well, it's been within two months, so that counts as a 'fresh' one IMO. Anyway, my no vote is more based on his posts, which I don't find terribly impressive. The caution just mildly adds up to that. I would probably have voted no, even without the caution.

**Lord Rahl** · February 18, 2006, 01:54 PM

Hey all you Praetors and your sexy badges!

Wait, we can give positive usernotes?

I'm going to have to say no on this one for similar reasons of Torment. Too many short posts basically but all he needs to do is start posting better ones!

**John I Tzimisces** · February 18, 2006, 03:39 PM

No, I just do not think he is a good enough poster, at all.

**Fabolous** · February 18, 2006, 07:35 PM

Spammy, short posts. No from me.

**Simetrical** · February 18, 2006, 09:34 PM

I personally think that he's a long-time contributing member and that this outcome is a bit unfair. Yes, his posts are brief, but they're constructive, regularly helpful. I've voted yes, and would urge some of my fellow staff to reconsider. Brief posts aren't bad, not when there are 794 and none of them spam.