Does prec attribute work here properly?

[xxxMoRaVexxx]

I last played BC like 2 years ago so I can't remember if the prec attribute works properly in this mod. I'm eagerly awaiting 3.0 too, I hope that I will enjoy it as much as I enjoyed the last time I played it.

[ALFAJI]

sure you'll enjoy it coz it will have lots lots of faction / new style in recruiting units / more realistic gameplay and more and more more

[trollface]

it's becoming more and more like EB, basically making the game harder but not in a good i.e. fun way

[sumskilz]

it's becoming more and more like EB, basically making the game harder but not in a good i.e. fun way

[wudang_clown]

It depends on what you consider as "fun".

[Heeehehe]

It depends on what you consider as "fun".

[trollface]

''fun''? Epic battles on bridges and sieges... not having to manage a crap economy that forces you to blitz before you go bankrupt Very few sieges and bridge battles in this game, mostly bland field battles

[Captain_Aramsham]

You enjoy sieges? As in, actually enjoy them? What on earth is wrong with you man? Siege warfare is the most stomach-churningly tedious part of any Total War game. Go and play a vanilla RTW campaign as Parthia, and then come back here and tell us you want more sieges.

[wudang_clown]

Well, I've never went bankrupt while playing BC, so your argument about crappy economy is not valid. Or it is valid but concerns rather of your playing style.

If you prefer to spend every penny each turn, then don't be surprised that you are in the red next turn. With proper and not that painful spending you'll never be in debt (at least as most factions) - and that concerns even Solankis campaign.

The same concerns sieges and field battles - that mostly your choices, not things coded in.

[Dago Red]

Many people enjoy sieges, of course! Just because they can be a bit buggy sometimes doesn't mean they aren't extremely enjoyable overall... they are also sometime the only real obstacle a player must face -- gathering the proper resources to take a well defended city/citadel. Anyone who liked to "set up" their neat armies as a kid around the bedroom, kitchen and backyard, probably goes giddy every time a siege is initiated. Just typing that sentence got me fired up to load up BC and fight a good long siege!

I'm talking stakes and towers, archers on the walls! Outnumbered and hopelessly surrounded! Ballistas in the streets man! House to house. The glory!

The horror, the horror.

[megalitho]

You enjoy sieges?

Absolutely!

As in, actually enjoy them? What on earth is wrong with you man?

hm, nothing? I´m fine...

Go and play a vanilla RTW campaign as Parthia, and then come back here and tell us you want more sieges.

Pathian infantry isn´t that strong, that is correct. So i would say the pathian campaign in RTW is "challenging"

I'm talking stakes and towers, archers on the walls! Outnumbered and hopelessly surrounded! Ballistas in the streets man! House to house. The glory!

The horror, the horror.

Absoolutely! In BC i am playing more sieges than normal battles...

[Rex Inanimatus]

Many of my generals are walltakers!, I just love them. The utter chaos, the uncontrollable street fighting, the dying horses, running out of reinforcements to capture the the square.... It's only a pity that you can't have heroic siege attacks while it sometimes really was an epic fight.

[Shasqua]

Sieges are fun, what with the mighty trebuchets pounding defenses while the infantry storm the breach under the cover of arrow showers. Defending is possibly even more fun, especially with stakes.

[Mik528]

Aaaah the siege. Nothing is more wonderful then defending your largest city against overwhelmimg odds and winning. I remember the siege of Baghdad i had those Seljuks tried hard but my Abna held fast nothing beats a siege my friend, get yourself a powerful force and besiege a full stack Citadel and youll see what challenge is.