Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 92

Thread: We don't need a new TW game every year CA

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default We don't need a new TW game every year CA

    Were not a bunch of ADD first person shooter 13 year old junkies that can't sit still for longer than 10 seconds at a time. Total War players are more mature and we tend to be very patient people.

    Anyone who can play through a 250 turn campaign and spend months crafting there leadership abilities and micro-management abilities does not need a new game every year.

    Believe me CA, we have far more patience.

    We don't need a new unpolished half finished game every year.

    Releasing games half finished, then running around like chickens with your heads cut off in an attempt to patch the holes does not look very professional.

    I'm sure the average TW gamer would have more than understood a 3-4 month delay in Shogun 2's release, so the game could have been better sorted out in relation to DirectX, multi-core optimization and general bug hunting.

    Releasing the demo 2 weeks before the game is released left you basically zero time to address any of the issues found in the demo.

    I honestly don't understand CA's time table when it came to S2TW.

    Although, I suspect SEGA is pushing for a new TW game every year, and if this is what we can expect in regards to the quality of the games, then all you have to do is look at Call of Duty to see how releasing a new game every year not only decreases the quality of the game, but leaves the game in an unfinished state.
    http://www.youtube.com/user/xsvspitfire - NEW VIDEOS UPLOADED DAILY
    Featuring Videos of: BF3, Bastion, Skyrim, Starcraft 2 & World In Conflict
    Hd 7850 2Gb
    Phenom II x3 4.0GHz
    8Gb RAM

  2. #2
    Brewskii's Avatar Senator
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Unstuck in Time
    Posts
    1,174

    Default Re: We don't need a new TW game every year CA

    okay

    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 
    Nothing, just wanted to see if you'd open it.

  3. #3

    Default

    Seriously, where are these people coming from. The game plays great; getting good reviews and the overall attitude about it is positive. These long drawn out posts about the state of the game being rushed and unplayable is just a lie.

  4. #4
    Yojimbo's Avatar Pig tail Sock
    Citizen

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Normandy Sr-2
    Posts
    7,628

    Default Re: We don't need a new TW game every year CA

    Quote Originally Posted by Rhylin View Post
    Seriously, where are these people coming from. The game plays great; getting good reviews and the overall attitude about it is positive. These long drawn out posts about the state of the game being rushed and unplayable is just a lie.
    Agreed its a great game and these posts are stupid. If they just patch the mp bugs.
    Read my author bio!
    Like my Facebook page!
    New guides for ROTS and FOTS!
    Please post feedback in the thread!
    Professional mod disliker.
    Writer for Android Rundown.

  5. #5
    Dubh the dark's Avatar Campidoctor
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Limerick, Ireland
    Posts
    1,807

    Default Re: We don't need a new TW game every year CA

    I'd like to know what people want. This is a great step forward for the series!
    What was expected, that utter, elusive thing called perfection?
    Are you striving towards an unrealistic ideal?
    If you don't like the games, don't buy them, switch series..;
    if you do, criticize constructively and be thankful for small mercies.
    Gaming is a choice, not a duty.
    No-one owes you anything in this world.

    Be grateful for what exists, rather than damning what doesn't.
    Censorship is never over for those who have experienced it. It is a brand on the imagination that affects the individual who has suffered it, forever.
    Noam Chomsky

  6. #6

    Default Re: We don't need a new TW game every year CA

    Generalizations


    you win at life


  7. #7
    Comrade_Rory's Avatar Protector Domesticus
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    4,074

    Default Re: We don't need a new TW game every year CA

    Actually... i'm quite happy for them to release one every year.

    And considering how their games are getting better every year, what's the problem?
    At this rate, we're all going to end up seeing the era we each want to see a lot sooner than a new game every 3 years or so.

  8. #8
    baz44331's Avatar Ordinarius
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    787

    Default Re: We don't need a new TW game every year CA

    This guy has done noting but post in lots of topics crying about Shogun 2. i cant see whats his problem. the games are alot better than the old days.

  9. #9

    Default Re: We don't need a new TW game every year CA

    i would drop the "we"........... since you dont know what the others want or not
    Common sense removed due being Disruptive.

  10. #10

    Default Re: We don't need a new TW game every year CA

    Quote Originally Posted by Ataegina View Post
    i would drop the "we"........... since you dont know what the others want or not
    Word, this thread is idiotic. CA has been able to consistently produce solid games in a year, why stop now? And yes, I'd love a new TW game every year and yes, I totally dig a new Call of Duty game every year too. Guess I'm one of those energetic 13 year olds that feed on energy drinks for sustenance.

    You fail


  11. #11

    Default Re: We don't need a new TW game every year CA

    Quote Originally Posted by gargarensi View Post
    Word, this thread is idiotic. CA has been able to consistently produce solid games in a year, why stop now? And yes, I'd love a new TW game every year and yes, I totally dig a new Call of Duty game every year too. Guess I'm one of those energetic 13 year olds that feed on energy drinks for sustenance.

    You fail
    I'd love a call of duty in World War 1 ..

    But compared to the TW, I think if they can finish the game in time to launch every year, that's fine, but if they can not, because a hurry?

  12. #12

    Default Re: We don't need a new TW game every year CA

    Quote Originally Posted by Relativista View Post
    I'd love a call of duty in World War 1 ..

    But compared to the TW, I think if they can finish the game in time to launch every year, that's fine, but if they can not, because a hurry?
    I always wondered how a FPS would work if they decided to do WW1. Granted I imagine very few automatic weapons and for the most part the main weapons would probably be bolt actions. But I think it could work.

    Quote Originally Posted by Googoo24 View Post
    Yes, yes, you hate the game.

    Regardless, what's the point of this topic?
    It gives people reasons to post lolcat and fail images


  13. #13

    Default Re: We don't need a new TW game every year CA

    Quote Originally Posted by gargarensi View Post
    Word, this thread is idiotic. CA has been able to consistently produce solid games in a year, why stop now? And yes, I'd love a new TW game every year and yes, I totally dig a new Call of Duty game every year too. Guess I'm one of those energetic 13 year olds that feed on energy drinks for sustenance.

    You fail
    You're joking, right? Solid games? That you can finish with in five or six hours, then all you've got is running around maps like Robocop on Speed, shooting people? No storyline, no script, nothing? That's not worth £30 in my opinion. And since most of what CoD does is multiplayer, can you honestly say that what you get that's new each year in multiplayer is worth £30? I very much doubt it.
    OPEN BATTLEFIELD CAPTURE POINTS AND IMPACT PUFFS HAVE GOT TO GO!
    REVERT INFANTRY THROWING PILAE TO ROME TW'S SYSTEM AS IT WAS PERFECT!

    Mobo: GA-P35-S3, CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400 2.66Ghz, GPU: AMD HD 6850 1GB, RAM: 4.Gb Corsair DDR2, Sound: Audigy 4, O/S: Windows 7 64bit Home Premium

  14. #14
    themoob's Avatar Centenarius
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    825

    Default Re: We don't need a new TW game every year CA

    Quote Originally Posted by SonOfCrusader76 View Post
    You're joking, right? Solid games? That you can finish with in five or six hours, then all you've got is running around maps like Robocop on Speed, shooting people? No storyline, no script, nothing? That's not worth £30 in my opinion. And since most of what CoD does is multiplayer, can you honestly say that what you get that's new each year in multiplayer is worth £30? I very much doubt it.
    Hey, don't complain about prices until you're in Australia, shelling out $100USD for new games

  15. #15

    Default Re: We don't need a new TW game every year CA

    Quote Originally Posted by SonOfCrusader76 View Post
    You're joking, right? Solid games? That you can finish with in five or six hours, then all you've got is running around maps like Robocop on Speed, shooting people? No storyline, no script, nothing? That's not worth £30 in my opinion. And since most of what CoD does is multiplayer, can you honestly say that what you get that's new each year in multiplayer is worth £30? I very much doubt it.
    An absolutely ignorant observation, there are loads of new features in the multiplayer aspect and polishing that goes into the gameplay of each game.

    I guess by your logic we can say that every single Total war game is pretty much the same game but with a different setting and looks prettier...


  16. #16
    ElementUK's Avatar Miles
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Bournemouth, Dorset, England
    Posts
    399

    Default Re: We don't need a new TW game every year CA

    Well I think he's right. Far better to bring out a polished product. What other industry in the world allows people to sell unfinished products and send them the parts later? NONE

    Obviously it's 'deadlines' that injures the games. Don't see it happening with console games do we?

    I've had no end of problems with it and spent morte time DLing files from Steam than actually playing it!

    I don't mind the frequency though as it's left to modders to keep them interesting long term.

  17. #17
    Sgt.Valenzuela's Avatar Civitate
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    California , U.S.
    Posts
    2,773

    Default Re: We don't need a new TW game every year CA

    Quote Originally Posted by ElementUK View Post
    Well I think he's right. Far better to bring out a polished product. What other industry in the world allows people to sell unfinished products and send them the parts later? NONE

    Obviously it's 'deadlines' that injures the games. Don't see it happening with console games do we?

    I've had no end of problems with it and spent morte time DLing files from Steam than actually playing it!

    I don't mind the frequency though as it's left to modders to keep them interesting long term.
    not many products deal with the amount of lines of code that must be done to make such games. Its more easy to make a physical product then it is to make a coded one such as a game.


    For Shogun I would like a greater variety of units and make the units recruited differ from faction to faction. Make battles realistic, slow down the units and make archers less accurate but do more damage.
    But most importantly for any total war games to come
    MAKE BETTER AI!
    MAKE BETTER AI!
    MAKE BETTER AI!
    MAKE BETTER AI!
    MAKE BETTER AI!
    And not one that gets cheats or have all the AI gang up on the human player just make the AI as smart as possible and then really concentrate on improving that above all else.
    More variety of units? differ from location to location? shoot good thing you didn't play the first S:TW.
    Make battles realistic? its a game and it will never be realistic.

    If they made the CAI "smart" and battles more "realistic" NOBODY would ever win! and everyone would be on here complaining how "hard" the game is.

    I can tell people have forgotten what difficulty means such as Hard and Very Hard.

    99% of all games out there with Hard and up difficulty has a cheating AI. On how much it cheats depends on what the makers gave it.

  18. #18
    Foederatus
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    43

    Default Re: We don't need a new TW game every year CA

    Quote Originally Posted by Sgt.Valenzuela View Post



    If they made the CAI "smart" and battles more "realistic" NOBODY would ever win! and everyone would be on here complaining how "hard" the game is.
    ??? My point is, make the harder difficulties harder through better AI not cheating. And of course people will still win, people are still far better than the AI I’m just saying to CA try your best to close that gap. In this way you feel challenged by a smart AI not one that is just competitive by having more armies due to free economy bonuses or battle AI that gets morale bonuses.


    Is it really fun to fight a faction who despite a weaker economy has more armies than you. You beat one of its armies but it means nothing because he has 5 more despite your superior economy. I would much prefer to fight a AI that challenges me through superior use of what its good than just having truck loads of free crap. I am not talking about Shogun so much I think this game has made huge advances in the right direction I am just saying future titles should continue in this way until the hardest level of difficulty is just better AI than lower difficulties and there are no bonuses to either side.

  19. #19
    Sgt.Valenzuela's Avatar Civitate
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    California , U.S.
    Posts
    2,773

    Default Re: We don't need a new TW game every year CA

    Quote Originally Posted by fnpdestroyer View Post
    ??? My point is, make the harder difficulties harder through better AI not cheating. And of course people will still win, people are still far better than the AI I’m just saying to CA try your best to close that gap. In this way you feel challenged by a smart AI not one that is just competitive by having more armies due to free economy bonuses or battle AI that gets morale bonuses.


    Is it really fun to fight a faction who despite a weaker economy has more armies than you. You beat one of its armies but it means nothing because he has 5 more despite your superior economy. I would much prefer to fight a AI that challenges me through superior use of what its good than just having truck loads of free crap. I am not talking about Shogun so much I think this game has made huge advances in the right direction I am just saying future titles should continue in this way until the hardest level of difficulty is just better AI than lower difficulties and there are no bonuses to either side.
    I completely understand what you are saying.

    Haven an AI that made all the right moves, built the right economy, engaged in perfect diplomacy, and waged war with tactics unmatched to create the ultimate challenge.

    Grab a snickers.... gonna be awhile.

    Before games where all about Gameplay and not graphics..... Now games are all about Graphics not Gameplay but I'm not saying its bad and I like playing S2:TW I'm saying games arent made like they use to be made.

  20. #20
    Darkpriest667's Avatar Campidoctor
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Amarillo Texas
    Posts
    1,724

    Default Re: We don't need a new TW game every year CA

    Quote Originally Posted by Sgt.Valenzuela View Post
    I completely understand what you are saying.

    Haven an AI that made all the right moves, built the right economy, engaged in perfect diplomacy, and waged war with tactics unmatched to create the ultimate challenge.

    Grab a snickers.... gonna be awhile.

    Before games where all about Gameplay and not graphics..... Now games are all about Graphics not Gameplay but I'm not saying its bad and I like playing S2:TW I'm saying games arent made like they use to be made.

    And that really is the problem with the gaming industry.


    I mean look at the ratio of performance versus cost on graphics.. you need a 200% increase in graphics performance to get a 5% improvement in visual beauty... Thats just ridiculous...

    Most of us have CPUS that can run circles around any AI Algorithm with room to spare... I wish companies would start working on the depth of games and not worry so damned much about the graphics.. The graphics are fine where they are now.. Please give me something I can get sucked into.
    In God we trust, all others we monitor - NSA motto
    CPU: Intel i7 2600k @ stock
    CPU HSF: Coolermaster Hyper 212+
    MOBO:ASrock Fatal1ty p67 professional series
    RAM: Gskill 16380MB @ 1600mhz
    GPU: XFX 6970 2048MB
    PSU: Corsair TX850M
    CASE: Coolermaster HAF 932
    HDD: 2 x Samsung F3 spinpoint 1TB each
    ODD: Asus DVD Burner 22x
    OS: Windows 8 Professional

Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •