Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: Malikate of Mazandaran

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Malikate of Mazandaran

    Name : Malikate of Mazandaran
    Native name : Al-e-bavand
    Title for Faction leader : Shah
    Title for Faction Hair : Ispahbed
    Religion : Islam , Shia
    ُSymbol :






    Kings :
    Shahryar IV (1073-1109)
    Karen II (1109-1117)
    Rostam IV (1117-1121)
    Ali (1117-1139)
    Rostam V (1139-1164)
    Hasan (1164-1170)
    Ardeshir I (1170-1205)
    Rostam VI (1205-1209)

    History
    :
    The Bavandi Dynasty (also spelled Bavend) was an Iranian dynasty that started in the early seventh century, as an independent group of rulers, reigning over Tabaristan in what is now northern Iran.
    The Bavandi name apparently comes from Bav, son of Kawus, son of Kavadh I, the Sasanian Emperor. As the story goes, Kawus, who was the elder son of Kawad, was passed over in favour of his younger brother Khosrau I Ausherwan, as the former was accused of Mazdakite sympathies. He was, however, reinstated in his position as the governor of Padishkhwargar, the name given to the northern satrapies of the Sasanian realm, consisting of Azerbaijan, Gilan, Tabaristan and Qumis, according to Mar'ashi.
    Whatever their origin, it seems that in the chaos that followed the fall of the Sasanians to the Arab Muslims, the descendants of Bav managed to carve themselves a semi-independent kingdom in the regions to the south of the Caspian Sea. Probably because of their royal blood, they were successful in gaining the upper hand in the region and established their rule over other local clans and dynasties, including the Paduspanis and the House of Karen.
    The early Bavandis were obviously Zoroastrian, but they later converted to Islam, as is attested to be the case for Karen son of Shahriar, the ninth ruler of the dynasty. They probably accepted the ZaidiShi'ism and became major supporters of the Zaidi and other Shi'ite movements. We know that Bavandis, along with other Tabari and Dailami dynasties, recognised the overlordship of Alavids such as Al-Utrush and assisted them in their struggles against the Caliphate. Another interpretation can be that the Bavandis used the influence of the Alavids among the common people in order to further their own agenda against the caliphal central rule. branch of
    The history of the Bavandis is detailed in the works of Ibn Isfandiar and Mar'ashi which belong to the genre of local histories that gained popularity in Iran after 1000 AD. We know that they were related to the Ziyarid dynasty, through the marriage of Mardanshah, the father of Ziyar, to the daughter of one of the Bavandi kings. The prominence of the Bavandi kings apparently continued throughout the Seljuk and Mongol period. One of their greatest kings, Shah Ghazi Rostam, is reported to have seriously defeated the Ismailis who were gaining prominence in Tabaristan and Dailam and to have made significant progress in consolidating power in the Caspian provinces.
    After the Mongol conquest, the Bavandis continued to rule as local strongmen of Tabaristan and sometimes Dailam. Their power was finally brought down around 1350 when Afrasiab of the JalaviyehFakhroldoleh Hasan, the last of the mainline Bavandi kings. dynasty, themselves an off-shoot of the Bavandis, managed to kill
    The Bavandi rule, which lasted from ca. AD 665-1350, was commonly divided to three periods. The first is the "Ispahbed" period, lasting until 1028. This is the period in which the dynasty seems to have been rather autonomous and quite influential in Tabaristan and Dailam, although they often acknowledged the overlordship of the Samanids or occasionally, the Ziyarids. However, with the death of the last Ispahbed, the dynasty became temporarily defunct.
    In 1062, a Bavandi prince re-found the dynasty, this time becoming known as "Kings of the Mountains" indicating the extent of the rule of the Bavandis in the highlands of Tabaristan. The greatest ruler of this stage was the aforementioned Shah Ghazi Rostam. The Kings of the Mountains became extinct in 1210, probably as a result of competition with the Ismailis and other local dynasties.
    During the chaos caused by the Mongol conquest of Iran, another branch of the dynasty was founded ca. 1240 which continued until 1350 when the last king of it was killed by Afrasiab of the JalaviyehKindkhwariyeh" by the local historians. dynasty. This stage is called "
    However, the above divisions might be the result of the mixing of the history of the Bavandis with that of the Paduspanis, a neighbouring clan who ruled over the area of Royaan (or Alamdeh)and Kojur and were similarly descended from the Sasanians. It is quite possible that the last stage above, that of the Kindkhwariyeh, was actually a Paduspani takeover of the Bavandi lands. This is also quite possible as it will explain the efforts of Afrasiab of the Jalaviyeh dynasty in defeating the Kindkhwariyeh, as the Jalaviyeh were themselves a branch of the Bavandis.

  2. #2

    Default Re: Malikate of Mazandaran

    َAny Suggestions ?!!!?

  3. #3

    Default Re: Malikate of Mazandaran

    Faction list is full. Have you got any suggestions on expanding it somehow?

  4. #4

    Default Re: Malikate of Mazandaran

    Mahmood the time of this mod is Too much bad .
    Why do you choose that time ?

  5. #5

    Default Re: Malikate of Mazandaran

    As far as I know the Bavandids are in it (if they have not been removed for one reason or the other). Check under faction banners here:

    http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showthread.php?t=392872

  6. #6
    Orko's Avatar Praeses
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Petah Tikva, Israel
    Posts
    8,916

    Default Re: Malikate of Mazandaran

    Yeah, Mazandaran already seems to be a confirmed faction, so I don't see the problem.
    Quote Originally Posted by Marcus Aurelius
    Live a good life. If there are gods and they are just, then they will not care how devout you have been, but will welcome you based on the virtues you have lived by. If there are gods, but unjust, then you should not want to worship them. If there are no gods, then you will be gone, but will have lived a noble life that will live on in the memories of your loved ones.

  7. #7

    Default Re: Malikate of Mazandaran

    No problem friends !
    It was a faction of BC 3.0
    I just research about that
    It is'nt a new faction

  8. #8

    Default Re: Malikate of Mazandaran

    I found their Faction symbol :

  9. #9
    matmohair1's Avatar Domesticus
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Abu Dhabi - UAE
    Posts
    2,155

    Default Re: Malikate of Mazandaran

    Quote Originally Posted by mahmood95 View Post
    I found their Faction symbol :
    isn't this a Sassanian symbol ?


  10. #10

    Default Re: Malikate of Mazandaran

    I made their faction symbol :

    Last edited by Mahmood; February 06, 2011 at 01:45 PM.

  11. #11

    Default Re: Malikate of Mazandaran

    And another :

  12. #12

    Default Re: Malikate of Mazandaran

    They knew themselves from Descendants of sassanian empire

  13. #13

    Default Re: Malikate of Mazandaran

    Quote Originally Posted by mahmood95 View Post
    Name : Malikate of Mazandaran
    Native name : Al-e-bavand
    Title for Faction leader : Shah
    Title for Faction Hair : Ispahbed
    Religion : Islam , Shia
    ُSymbol :






    Kings :
    Shahryar IV (1073-1109)
    Karen II (1109-1117)
    Rostam IV (1117-1121)
    Ali (1117-1139)
    Rostam V (1139-1164)
    Hasan (1164-1170)
    Ardeshir I (1170-1205)
    Rostam VI (1205-1209)

    History :
    The Bavandi Dynasty (also spelled Bavend) was an Iranian dynasty that started in the early seventh century, as an independent group of rulers, reigning over Tabaristan in what is now northern Iran.
    The Bavandi name apparently comes from Bav, son of Kawus, son of Kavadh I, the Sasanian Emperor. As the story goes, Kawus, who was the elder son of Kawad, was passed over in favour of his younger brother Khosrau I Ausherwan, as the former was accused of Mazdakite sympathies. He was, however, reinstated in his position as the governor of Padishkhwargar, the name given to the northern satrapies of the Sasanian realm, consisting of Azerbaijan, Gilan, Tabaristan and Qumis, according to Mar'ashi.
    Whatever their origin, it seems that in the chaos that followed the fall of the Sasanians to the Arab Muslims, the descendants of Bav managed to carve themselves a semi-independent kingdom in the regions to the south of the Caspian Sea. Probably because of their royal blood, they were successful in gaining the upper hand in the region and established their rule over other local clans and dynasties, including the Paduspanis and the House of Karen.
    The early Bavandis were obviously Zoroastrian, but they later converted to Islam, as is attested to be the case for Karen son of Shahriar, the ninth ruler of the dynasty. They probably accepted the ZaidiShi'ism and became major supporters of the Zaidi and other Shi'ite movements. We know that Bavandis, along with other Tabari and Dailami dynasties, recognised the overlordship of Alavids such as Al-Utrush and assisted them in their struggles against the Caliphate. Another interpretation can be that the Bavandis used the influence of the Alavids among the common people in order to further their own agenda against the caliphal central rule. branch of
    The history of the Bavandis is detailed in the works of Ibn Isfandiar and Mar'ashi which belong to the genre of local histories that gained popularity in Iran after 1000 AD. We know that they were related to the Ziyarid dynasty, through the marriage of Mardanshah, the father of Ziyar, to the daughter of one of the Bavandi kings. The prominence of the Bavandi kings apparently continued throughout the Seljuk and Mongol period. One of their greatest kings, Shah Ghazi Rostam, is reported to have seriously defeated the Ismailis who were gaining prominence in Tabaristan and Dailam and to have made significant progress in consolidating power in the Caspian provinces.
    After the Mongol conquest, the Bavandis continued to rule as local strongmen of Tabaristan and sometimes Dailam. Their power was finally brought down around 1350 when Afrasiab of the JalaviyehFakhroldoleh Hasan, the last of the mainline Bavandi kings. dynasty, themselves an off-shoot of the Bavandis, managed to kill
    The Bavandi rule, which lasted from ca. AD 665-1350, was commonly divided to three periods. The first is the "Ispahbed" period, lasting until 1028. This is the period in which the dynasty seems to have been rather autonomous and quite influential in Tabaristan and Dailam, although they often acknowledged the overlordship of the Samanids or occasionally, the Ziyarids. However, with the death of the last Ispahbed, the dynasty became temporarily defunct.
    In 1062, a Bavandi prince re-found the dynasty, this time becoming known as "Kings of the Mountains" indicating the extent of the rule of the Bavandis in the highlands of Tabaristan. The greatest ruler of this stage was the aforementioned Shah Ghazi Rostam. The Kings of the Mountains became extinct in 1210, probably as a result of competition with the Ismailis and other local dynasties.
    During the chaos caused by the Mongol conquest of Iran, another branch of the dynasty was founded ca. 1240 which continued until 1350 when the last king of it was killed by Afrasiab of the JalaviyehKindkhwariyeh" by the local historians. dynasty. This stage is called "
    However, the above divisions might be the result of the mixing of the history of the Bavandis with that of the Paduspanis, a neighbouring clan who ruled over the area of Royaan (or Alamdeh)and Kojur and were similarly descended from the Sasanians. It is quite possible that the last stage above, that of the Kindkhwariyeh, was actually a Paduspani takeover of the Bavandi lands. This is also quite possible as it will explain the efforts of Afrasiab of the Jalaviyeh dynasty in defeating the Kindkhwariyeh, as the Jalaviyeh were themselves a branch of the Bavandis.
    wow nice mod just remmember make mazandaran (actually tabarestan in this time frame) strong they shoud have strong infanry so that they can kick the arabs butt
    Quote Originally Posted by Blatta Optima Maxima View Post
    So you have reached the "NANANANANA I AM NOT LIZTENING, YOU ARE WRONG" phase. Just a couple of posts back you were bragging about how the Persians lost because of their inferiority, now you're saying you don't care?
    BOM to Kakabis
    http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showthread.php?t=484498
    my AAR, please check it out

  14. #14

    Default Re: Malikate of Mazandaran

    i prefer them to be historically accurate actually.

  15. #15

    Default Re: Malikate of Mazandaran

    Quote Originally Posted by Toho View Post
    i prefer them to be historically accurate actually.
    Though the days of infantry dominated armies had past, the northern Iranian infantry from Gilan and Mazandaran were generally considered to be some of the best infantry in the Middle-East. They served as mercenaries in most Islamic armies of the region.
    Quote Originally Posted by Enros View Post
    You don't seem to be familiar with how the burden of proof works in when discussing social justice. It's not like science where it lies on the one making the claim. If someone claims to be oppressed, they don't have to prove it.


  16. #16

    Default Re: Malikate of Mazandaran

    Quote Originally Posted by Toho View Post
    i prefer them to be historically accurate actually.
    what he said. YOU MY FRIEND need to study more history no offense I want them historical as well
    Quote Originally Posted by sumskilz View Post
    Though the days of infantry dominated armies had past, the northern Iranian infantry from Gilan and Mazandaran were generally considered to be some of the best infantry in the Middle-East. They served as mercenaries in most Islamic armies of the region.
    Quote Originally Posted by Blatta Optima Maxima View Post
    So you have reached the "NANANANANA I AM NOT LIZTENING, YOU ARE WRONG" phase. Just a couple of posts back you were bragging about how the Persians lost because of their inferiority, now you're saying you don't care?
    BOM to Kakabis
    http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showthread.php?t=484498
    my AAR, please check it out

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •