View Poll Results: Which concept of HotS you like more?

Voters
118. You may not vote on this poll
  • 1. I like the new HotS concept from 1003-1205

    66 55.93%
  • 2. I prefer the old HotS concept from 1040-1205

    18 15.25%
  • 3. Both concepts are good, hard to decide.

    34 28.81%
Page 10 of 31 FirstFirst 1234567891011121314151617181920 ... LastLast
Results 181 to 200 of 634

Thread: Horsemen Of The Steppe

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Grymloq's Avatar Domesticus
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Venice, Italy
    Posts
    2,172

    Default Re: Horsemen Of The Steppe


  2. #2

    Default Re: Horsemen Of The Steppe

    Nice.

  3. #3

    Default Re: Horsemen Of The Steppe

    I think I will introduce two changes on the map:

    to remove:
    1. Aydhab
    - reason: Fatimids got realy comfortable situation and plenty provinces already
    2. Iconium or Attalia
    - reason: right now Romans/Greeks got 19 provinces at start, definitely the most of all

    to add:
    1. province for Emirate of Mosul, it could be Anbar/Samarra/Dakuka/Nasibin - issue to be discussed with Arabic researchers
    - reason: Emirate of Mosul is situated among the largest factions and they got very dificult situation while they should be strong with good perspective for development
    2. province for the Great Sultanate of Seljuks, it could be Bistam or Serakhs or something else in that area
    - reason: we need to give the Seljuks best potential for development. They should be the most powerful faction in the game, as in history of that period.

    Good news is that v1499 gave us permission to use his Chinese units. Some of them could be used for Kara Khitans, and some could be available for recruitment within AoR of provinces like Dunhuang and Cherchen. Also v1499 agreed to advise us with issues related with the eastern lands of HotS map. Thank you v1499 for your precious support
    Last edited by Silesian_Noble; March 19, 2011 at 02:45 PM.


  4. #4

    Default Re: Horsemen Of The Steppe

    see give mosel sinjar city and sammera if you want

  5. #5

    Default Re: Horsemen Of The Steppe

    Samarra and Serakhs are good choices I think.

  6. #6
    VINC.XXIII's Avatar Retired
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Oxybian hills
    Posts
    4,644

    Default Re: Horsemen Of The Steppe

    I'm forward to see the concept art about the units.
    The Cuman Roster appear to me as...exhaustiv!

  7. #7

    Default Re: Horsemen Of The Steppe

    So I think the new provinces will be Samarra and Serakhs. But Alfaji, are we sure that Samarra was controlled by Emirate of Mosul in 1040y?

    I think I will change also Tbilisi with something that was realy under Georgian control. Also some changes within Hungarian provinces are likely as from the research I have recently made it turns out that Kassa had little importance in 1040y.

    Speaking about Hungary, the work on the concept of its roster is in progress.

    Also I think I will modify Egyptian provinces, I will not remove Aydhab. I will remove both Aswan and Asyut and replace them with Qift which is located half way between Aswan and Asyut.

    Quote Originally Posted by Rus-Bey View Post
    I'm forward to see the concept art about the units.
    The Cuman Roster appear to me as...exhaustiv!
    Yeah but it will take some time. I'm during education of how to mod units. Good news is that Thrashing_Mad (known from projects like Dominium Maris Baltici or Polished Poland) agreed to support me in dealing with any problems I may find during that education. He is a great and experienced 2d/3d artist and his native language is the same as mine (Polish) so I can't imagine a better mentor
    Last edited by Silesian_Noble; March 21, 2011 at 02:53 PM.


  8. #8

    Default Re: Horsemen Of The Steppe

    Here is an update in HotS progress:

    1. some small map improvments
    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

    I have changed:
    1. Aswan (of Fatimids) with Samara (of Mosul)
    2. Attalia (of ERE) with Serakhs (of Seljuks)
    3. Asyut with Qift (both Fatimids)
    4. Kassa with Csanad (both Hungarian)
    5. Serem with Zagrab (both Hungarian)

    Refreshed map views:





    Some screen shoots:





    2. Hungarian roster concept
    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

    It will definitely be improved, I discuss it with Csatadi and Dome.

    CAVALRY

    name: Inseg horsemen
    description: poor tribal horse archers
    class: light
    armor: padded
    primary weapon: composite bow
    secondary weapon: sabre
    skills: average
    stamina: standard
    morale: average
    availability: very good
    price: low

    name: Boseg horsemen
    description: richer tribal horse archers
    class: light/medium
    armor: padded+helmets / partially lamellar or mailed
    primary weapon: composite bow
    secondary weapon: spear, small round shield
    skills: very good
    stamina: good
    morale: very good
    availability: good
    price: high

    name: Jobbagyur cavalry
    description: ruler's elite unit
    class: medium / heavy
    armor: partially mailed or lamellar / mailed or lamellar
    primary weapon: composite bow
    secondary weapon: sabre, medium round shield
    skills: very good
    stamina: very good
    morale: very good
    availability: very low
    price: very high

    name: Black Magyars horsemen
    description: tribal cavalry originated in turkic allied tribes (like Kabars)
    class: light/medium
    armor: padded + helmets/partially mailed or lamellar
    primary weapon: composite bow
    secondary weapon: mace, small round shield
    skills: good
    stamina: good
    morale: good
    availability: average
    price: average

    name: Szekelys horsemen
    description: famous horse archers settled in mostly boarderland areas
    class: light/medium
    armor: padded + helmets/partially mailed or lamellar
    primary weapon: composite bow
    secondary weapon: sabre, small round shield
    skills: very good
    stamina: very good
    morale: very good
    availability: average
    price: high

    name: Pecheneg horsemen
    description: Pechenegs refugee which served Hungarian king
    class: light
    armor: padded+helmets
    primary weapon: composite bow
    secondary weapon: mace
    skills: good
    stamina: very good
    morale: average
    availability: average
    price: average

    name: Croat cavalry
    description: Slavic horsemen from Slavonia
    class: medium
    armor: partially mailed
    primary weapon: spear, teardrop shield
    secondary weapon: axe, teardrop shield
    skills: good
    stamina: good
    morale: average
    availability: average
    price: average

    name: Mounted servientes
    description: the knights that appeaed in Hungary with Christianity adoption were assisted by them
    class: light/medium
    armor: padded+helmets/partially mailed
    primary weapon: spear, teardrop shied
    secondary weapon: axe, teardrop shied
    skills: average
    stamina: average
    morale: average
    availability: very good
    price: average

    name: Feudal knights
    description: late unit', feudalism spred very slowly in Hungary, but as the time passed more and more native knights appeared in Hungarian army
    class: heavy
    armor: fully mailed, barded horse
    primary weapon: spear, kite shield
    secondary weapon: sword, kite shield
    skills: very good
    stamina: very good
    morale: very good
    availability: average
    price: very high

    name: German knights
    description: those are knights from Swabia and Bavaria which were invited and settled by Hungarian ruler
    class: heavy
    armor: fully mailed
    primary weapon: spear, large kite shield
    secondary weapon: sword, kite shield
    stamina: very good
    skills: great
    morale: very good
    availability: low
    price: very high

    name: Royal guard
    description: general bodyguards
    class: heavy
    armor: fully mailed
    primary weapon: spear, large norman shield
    secondary weapon: sword, large norman shield
    skills: very good
    stamina: very good
    morale: very good
    availability: general unit
    price: -


    INFANTRY

    name: Varjobbagy archers
    description: castle soldiers of mostly Slavic origin, non noble freemen
    class: light
    armour: padded+helmets
    primary weapon: composite bow
    secondary weapon: sabre, shield
    skills: good
    stamina: good
    morale: good
    availability: good
    price: low

    name: Inseg archers
    description: poor tribal archers
    class: light
    armor: no / padded
    primary weapon: composite bow
    secondary weapon: dagger
    skills: average
    stamina: average
    morale: average
    availability: good
    price: low

    name: Boseg archers
    description: richer tribal archers
    class: light
    armor: padded + helmets / partially mailed or lamellar
    primary weapon: composite bow
    secondary weapon: spear, small round shield
    skills: good
    stamina: good
    morale: good
    availability: average
    price: high

    name: Varjobbagy javeliners
    description: castle soldiers of mostly Slavic origin, non noble freemen
    class: light
    armor: padded + helmets
    primary weapon: javelins
    secondary weapon: round shield + light axe
    skills: good
    stamina: good
    morale: good
    availability: average
    price: average

    name: Crossbow militia
    description: late unit originated in mostly non-Magyar town's western settlers
    class: light
    armor: padded + helmets
    primary weapon: xbow
    secondary weapon: sword
    skills: average
    stamina: average
    morale: average
    availability: low
    price: high

    name: Varjobbagy spearmen
    description: castle soldiers of mostly Slavic origin, non noble freemen
    class: medium
    armor: padded + helmets/partially lamellar or mailed
    primary weapon: spear, round shield
    secondary weapon: -
    skills: good
    stamina: good
    morale: good
    availability: good
    price: average

    name: Spear militia
    description: late unit originated in mostly non-Magyar town's western settlers
    class: medium
    armor: padded+helmets / partially mailed
    primary weapon: spear, teardrop shield
    secondary weapon: -
    skills: average
    stamina: average
    morale: average
    availability: good
    price: average

    name: Feudal footmen
    description: late unit, rich feudals could afford own castles and footmen that garrison them
    class: light / medium
    armor: padded + helmets / partially lamellar or mail
    primary weapon: axe, teardrop shield
    secondary weapon: -
    stamina: average
    morale: average
    availability: average
    price: average

    name: Dismounted knights
    description: late unit, knights sometimes fought on foot
    class: heavy
    armor: full mailed
    primary weapon: sword, large norman shield (kite)
    secondary weapon: -
    stamina: very good
    morale: very good
    availability: low
    price: very high

    name: Varyag axemen
    description: Hungarian rulers similar to neighbours like ERE, Kiev or Poland recrutited famous norse warriors
    class: medium/heavy
    armor: partially lamellar or mail/fully lamellar or mail
    primary weapon: 2h axe
    secondary weapon: -
    stamina: very good
    morale: very good
    availability: very low
    price: very high



    3. Addition to Quman roster concept
    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

    After reading Ospray Atilla and the nomad hordes I decided to add one more unit to Quman roster - Javelin horsemen. So the Quman roster would look more or less like that:

    CAVALRY

    Shepard horsemen
    Tribal horsemen
    Tribal lancers
    Boarder horsemen
    Camel riders
    Khan horse archers
    Khan lancers
    Noble horsemen
    Noble lancers
    Khan guard


    Name: Javelin horsmen
    description: Qumans liked to hunt with javelins, sometimes they used them in battle
    class: light
    armor: padded + helmets
    primary weapon: javelins
    secondary weapon: sabre
    stamina: good
    morale: average
    availability: average
    price: low

    INFANTRY

    Shepard archers
    Tribal archers
    Noble archers
    Tribal spearmen
    Khan spearmen
    Tribal axemen
    Khan footmen
    Noble footmen



    Sorry for the slow progress but I'm renovating my flat right now so my spare time is very little these days


  9. #9

    Default Re: Horsemen Of The Steppe

    How come this mod doesnt appear in the TW Center list of mods or mods in progress...I stumbled on this mod while reading posts and am happy I did....I can't wait for it to be released...

  10. #10

    Default Re: Horsemen Of The Steppe

    Wow...who woulda thought one man woukd stop a whole thread....the truth hurts....

  11. #11

    Default Re: Horsemen Of The Steppe

    Quote Originally Posted by MikeNice808 View Post
    Wow...who woulda thought one man woukd stop a whole thread....the truth hurts....
    I have no idea what you mean. Right now I'm very busy with my RL and this is why I haven't updated the thread for a few days. But my desire to make HotS mod is not even a bit lesser (if not higher ). If you are so much interested in HotS project (and I'm really glad people are interested in it) then you are welcome to support it with your work. Can you mod? Or maybe you have some nice sources for historical research?


  12. #12

    Default Re: Horsemen Of The Steppe

    Quote Originally Posted by Silesian_Noble View Post
    I have no idea what you mean. Right now I'm very busy with my RL and this is why I haven't updated the thread for a few days. But my desire to make HotS mod is not even a bit lesser (if not higher ). If you are so much interested in HotS project (and I'm really glad people are interested in it) then you are welcome to support it with your work. Can you mod? Or maybe you have some nice sources for historical research?

    I have no modding skills whatsoever. Sometimes I have trouble installing them on my computer. But I have a keen interest in this mod and would be more than happy to do some research. Can you be more specific. I would like to specialize with Kiev but could do more on anything. Im unemployed right now so I have the time. Let me know in what areas. I dont mind doing some work for ya. I got the internet afterall so info is a button away...

  13. #13

    Default Re: Horsemen Of The Steppe

    Quote Originally Posted by MikeNice808 View Post
    I have no modding skills whatsoever. Sometimes I have trouble installing them on my computer. But I have a keen interest in this mod and would be more than happy to do some research. Can you be more specific. I would like to specialize with Kiev but could do more on anything. Im unemployed right now so I have the time. Let me know in what areas. I dont mind doing some work for ya. I got the internet afterall so info is a button away...
    Well I need Kievian researcher but it should be somebody who can read Cyrilic. So if you can then that would be great In such case you could also scan Russian/Ukrainian sources for info related with factions that land of which used to be or is now under ZSRR/Russia/Ukraine control, so Pecheneg, Qumans, Volga Bulgaria, Bashkirs, Great Perm, Taiga, Qipchaks, Kyrgyz, Kimek etc. BTW I have have looked at your profile and wonder - are you from Poland?


  14. #14
    Boztorgai_Khan's Avatar Domesticus
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Zutphen - (Netherlands)
    Posts
    2,028

    Default Re: Horsemen Of The Steppe

    I Upload a Picture of the Kimäk's Go To The Western Steppes became First Kipchaks, Later Cumans: Broke up into separate in 3::

    1000's AD Century


    The Kypchak languages may be broken down into three groups, based on geography and shared features:

    Kypchak-Bolgar (Uralo-Caspian), including Bashkir and Tatar (including Siberian Tatar, Mishar Tatar, Astrakhan Tatar, Baraba Tatar, etc.)

    Kypchak-Cuman (Ponto-Caspian), including Karachay-Balkar, Kumyk, Karaim, Krymchak, and the extinct Cuman and Kipchak languages. Urum and Crimean Tatar appear to have a Kypchak-Cuman base, but have been heavily influenced by Oghuz languages.

    Kazakh-Nogay, including Kazakh, Karakalpak, and Nogay
    The Uzbek language's Kypchak dialect contains the remainder of Kypchak languages that were once spoken in Uzbekistan, and there is a dialect continuum between Uzbek and Kazakh.

    The language of the Mamluks in Egypt appears to have been a Kypchak language, probably one belonging to the Kazakh-Nogay group.


    The modern Northwestern branch of the Turkic languages is often referred to as the Kipchak branch. The languages in this branch are mostly considered to be descendants of the Kipchak language, and the people who speak them may likewise be referred to as Kipchak peoples. Some of the groups traditionally included are the Siberian Tatars, Kumyks, Nogays, Bashkirs, Kazakhs, Kyrgyz, Tatars and Crimean Tatars.

    There is also a village named 'Kipchak' in Crimea.

    Cuman (also Kuman) was a Kipchak Turkic language spoken by the Kipchaks, also known in the Greek annals as Cumans, in the west as Kumans, undiscriminative Polovetses in the Slavic and Rus annals, and Kuns in the Hungarian annals, the language was similar to the today's Crimean Tatar language. The Kipchak language is documented in medieval works, including the Codex Cumanicus, and it was a literary language in the Central and Eastern Europe that left a rich literary inheritance.
    Last edited by Boztorgai_Khan; April 08, 2011 at 03:26 PM. Reason: Add Info About Language



    MOD's: >>> K-MTW2 & EW MOD & BC MOD <<< BoZToRGai KHaN

    Official Web Site: http://www.djeak.com/boztorgaikhan/ (Coming Soon..!!!)

    Website: http://www.cumankipchaksgroup.com/ (Coming Soon..!!!)


  15. #15

    Default Re: Horsemen Of The Steppe

    Quote Originally Posted by Silesian_Noble View Post
    Well I need Kievian researcher but it should be somebody who can read Cyrilic. So if you can then that would be great In such case you could also scan Russian/Ukrainian sources for info related with factions that land of which used to be or is now under ZSRR/Russia/Ukraine control, so Pecheneg, Qumans, Volga Bulgaria, Bashkirs, Great Perm, Taiga, Qipchaks, Kyrgyz, Kimek etc. BTW I have have looked at your profile and wonder - are you from Poland?

    No sorry I can only read English. But why would you need me to read Cyrilic? I have internet access and can do research from my computer. In any way I can help out I will. And as my symbol says-I am Ukrainian. I live in a town called Garfield(which I call G-town). There are alot of Polish there so I call my city lil Poland. We are right near New York City. I love Polish delis and Polish women. My dad calls me the son of Tarus Bulba...

  16. #16

    Default Re: Horsemen Of The Steppe

    Great project, +rep for you!

  17. #17

    Default Re: Horsemen Of The Steppe

    Hm bro thats are to be good works,,,,,,,,,,,,

  18. #18

    Default Re: Horsemen Of The Steppe

    Quote Originally Posted by Boztorgai_Khan View Post
    During the 10th century the Kipchaks became independent within the Kaganate (if they were ever dependent in the first place), and began migrating westward.
    I think it rather happened in first half of XIc. We know that in 985y Oghuz together with Kievians attacked Volga-Bulgaria, that means there were no Qumans/Qipchaks between Aral and Caspian Seas steppes in that time.

    Quote Originally Posted by Boztorgai_Khan View Post
    The zenith of Kimak power came under the Ilburi rulers near the end of the 12th century. In 1183, the Kimaks attacked Volga Bulgaria, and they twice sacked Khwarezm, in the 1152 and 1197.
    How Kimek could have its power zenith near the end of the 12th century, while we know they collapsed around half XI and later became dominated by Qipchaks? Of course it was Qipchak khanate that invaded Khwarezm in XIIc, not Kimek.

    Quote Originally Posted by Boztorgai_Khan View Post
    Kimek Khaganate was in 1050 AD ended after then became the Kipchaks in a Confederation.
    The events were like that:
    1041 - Yabgu of Oghuz conquered Shahdom of Khwarezm.
    1043 - Seljuks drove Oghuz from Khwarezm
    half XIc - Qipchaks invaded lower Syr-Darya region, defeated weakened Yabgu of Oghuz (which earlier were crushed by Seljuks in Khwarezm) which became their vassals
    With the latter event Qipchaks became very powerful and from now on the Kimaks became subjects to them.

    P.S. Boztorgai - the first and third spoiler include the same info, some other sections are also repeated - please remove redundant ones.


  19. #19
    Boztorgai_Khan's Avatar Domesticus
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Zutphen - (Netherlands)
    Posts
    2,028

    Default Re: Horsemen Of The Steppe

    Quote Originally Posted by Silesian_Noble View Post
    I think it rather happened in first half of XIc. We know that in 985y Oghuz together with Kievians attacked Volga-Bulgaria, that means there were no Qumans/Qipchaks between Aral and Caspian Seas steppes in that time.


    How Kimek could have its power zenith near the end of the 12th century, while we know they collapsed around half XI and later became dominated by Qipchaks? Of course it was Qipchak khanate that invaded Khwarezm in XIIc, not Kimek.


    The events were like that:
    1041 - Yabgu of Oghuz conquered Shahdom of Khwarezm.
    1043 - Seljuks drove Oghuz from Khwarezm
    half XIc - Qipchaks invaded lower Syr-Darya region, defeated weakened Yabgu of Oghuz (which earlier were crushed by Seljuks in Khwarezm) which became their vassals
    With the latter event Qipchaks became very powerful and from now on the Kimaks became subjects to them.

    P.S. Boztorgai - the first and third spoiler include the same info, some other sections are also repeated - please remove redundant ones.
    I Did it

    I'am busy with find the Banners for the Factions.

    About banners(flag,coa) for Qumans, Qipchaqs and Kimäks

    Qumans are Qipchaqs ( Qipchaqs are Qumans ) they are same. For Leader family tree can I make what but for Banner(flag,coa) is problem for me. Because for all two then must we use the Wolf head Tug maybe added for this two factions then with one backside blue other light blue colours. here upload i 2 pictures look like this:
    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 




    for Kimäks is then make a snake with 7-heads. What think you about this ?

    Kimäks: The Imak (Yemak, Kimak) tribe became the head of the union, and later of the Kimak Kaganate. In another transcription the tribal name sounds like "Kai", which in Mongolian means "snake". Possibly during the consolidation of the seven tribes appeared the expression: "A snake has seven heads".




    Pechenegs use the Tamga:


    What think you is it possible to make what with this ???



    MOD's: >>> K-MTW2 & EW MOD & BC MOD <<< BoZToRGai KHaN

    Official Web Site: http://www.djeak.com/boztorgaikhan/ (Coming Soon..!!!)

    Website: http://www.cumankipchaksgroup.com/ (Coming Soon..!!!)


  20. #20

    Default Re: Horsemen Of The Steppe

    The first picture of 7heads snake looks very interesting - do you know where is it from? I think it would be good choice for Kimek CoA. Same for wolf head as CoA of two kin factions of Qumans and Qipchaks.

    About the Tamga of Pecheneg - it looks very modest, I'm not sure whether this symbol is the best choice for Pecheneg CoA. I think we should investigate what CoA got Pecheneg in other mods, like Rus2 or TGC.

    And about claim that Qumans and Qipchaks are the same, I can compare them to Saxons and Bavarians - some may say they are the same - Germans, but in fact they were different tribes with distinct traditions.

    I have recently started work on map heights, I hope I will be soon ready to show you some screenshots of the map progress.
    Last edited by Silesian_Noble; April 13, 2011 at 06:05 PM.


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •