Divine Cosmos

[Toggle_FoW ツ]

I have no idea if this diverse community already discussed (or rejected) what I'm about to share, but anyone visit the site www.divinecosmos.com ? This site is ran by David Wilcock that talks a load info about what god is and ancient history. It have convincing topics and it totally deserves to be looked for all you atheists and religion devotees alike.

By the way, this site is not really "beginner friendly" and it took a while to understand. Its a more complicated cousin of Buddhism (because it has to do with Chakras (spellcheck) and Karma). Start at his blog library, couldn't sleep looking at them!

[Helm]

We share a radiant field of conscious mind energy which causes global warming? Oh wow you've got to love this stuff.

[Gordon Freynman]

If Helm finds it nutty then I don't know how badly I might react to it.

[Helm]

I find quite a lot of things nutty? Half the posts on here for a start.

The guys face is completely monged up to buggery I'm not sure whats wrong with him.

[black-dragon]

Postmodernism alert!

[Tuor]

I thought I might just read a few things on the site out of curiosity. I soon came across this.

The mass, worldwide bird and fish deaths are obviously not due to fireworks or cold weather. Nor can they be blamed on a thinning ozone layer or toxic gases.


I believe the birds are casualties in a worldwide war for Disclosure that has now reached critical mass -- complete with frantic political assassinations in a last-ditch attempt to stave off the inevitable.


Brazil, Russia, India and China have all apparently been contacted by positive ETs who are finally intervening to stop these negative forces on Earth -- by physically destroying their classified, back-engineered military equipment.

I soon closed my tab.

[Vagn]

Hm, it has a shop. Taking advantage of new-age art students perhaps?

[Himster]

Taking advantage of new-age art students perhaps?

Hey, that's mean. There's only a tiny percentage of us like that and they're usually awfull.

[black-dragon]

You even have to pay to access the store lol. It's $0.01, but still...

[chriscase]

You even have to pay to access the store lol. It's $0.01, but still...

Card-skimming for a cause.

[Theseus1234]

The Science of Peace??
Science does not take sides. She is a cold hearted motherer.

[chriscase]

The Science of Peace??
Science does not take sides. She is a cold hearted motherer.

Interesting. I didn't know that Science was a lesbian.

[Helm]

Well nothing would exist if it weren't for science, I don't think we're supposed to worship it though.

[The Dude]

Well nothing would exist if it weren't for science

Say what?

o_O

[Helm]

Say what?

o_O

We're all products of a scientific process unless you want to bring the supernatural into it.

[The Dude]

We're all products of a scientific process unless you want to bring the supernatural into it.

Science is a means of analyzing the processes of nature. The processes of nature aren't itself scientific. I hope you understand the difference between the two. Otherwise you're arguing that there would have been nothing if there hadn't been human beings conducting science. Obviously that is not true, there would've been a whole load of things even without us.

[Helm]

Science is a means of analyzing the processes of nature. The processes of nature aren't itself scientific. I hope you understand the difference between the two. Otherwise you're arguing that there would have been nothing if there hadn't been human beings conducting science. Obviously that is not true, there would've been a whole load of things even without us.

Science is the study of nature so nature is covered by science and is therefore a process science can explain. Therefore we were created by a scientifical explainable process.

[chriscase]

We're all products of a scientific process unless you want to bring the supernatural into it.

I can't say I agree with that. Science is a conceptual framework and methodology that has enabled us to delve into the workings of the natural world; it's not equivalent to it, or complete. There are good reasons to speculate that science cannot ever be a complete description of the natural world. To label the natural world itself as a "scientific" process is both a conflation of the observer with the observed and a potentially massive conceptual reduction of the natural world itself.

Edt: Looks like The Dude beat me to it.

[boofhead]

The guy is convinced he's a reincarnated Edger Cayce. I doubt that's a good thing.

[Helm]

No no seriously, why do we need an explanation we can't prove and have no evidence for that can't be explained to explain something we don't know and don't have any evidence for? Not knowing everything doesn't mean you can't try and apply a bit of common sense. If you have an issue that can't be expained but science will eventually be able to explain then that's straightforward.