Dacia

[EgyptianWarLord]

Question: Why did u guys get rid of Dacia? Dacia would have been interesting to keep since it could have some serious potential than in vanilla.

P.s. To the creators of this mod, I have only one thing to say to you. Thank you

[Spartan198]

Question: Why did u guys get rid of Dacia? Dacia would have been interesting to keep since it could have some serious potential than in vanilla.

They're boring and uninteresting when compared to Baktria and Saba?

[Grimbold]

The dacians were a Thracian tribe, so it makes more sense to put Thrace up as a faction than dacia since its just a branch of the first.

Dacia only becomes relevant later on during roman expansion. Dacia was put off the map when it was conquered by emperor Trajan.

[DragMaster]

Thracian and Dacian can not be together, the two would be in a war in which none would win, except Macedonia

[Grimbold]

Thracian and Dacian can not be together, the two would be in a war in which none would win, except Macedonia

Well wouldnt make much sense since they're not distinct factions/ "nations". Dacia was a thracian tribe. If there was a war with would be with another thracian tribe.

Its like Gaul or Iberia where there's a group of several tribes that, even though they'd have some distinct traits, share the same culture and ways.

[DragMaster]

I say for the game, would greatly increase the difficulty of these factions

[Unknown Soldier]

Faction limit is at maximum - there is no space for another faction.

[DimeBagHo]

Pretty much all of the above. Dacia's unit roster would have been very similar to the Thracian roster, and in most campaigns one would have killed the other, or they would have kept each other weak and been quickly killed off by a third faction, like Macedon. So Dacia was turned into Saba, which has a more distinctive roster and a very different campaign experience.