Becouse of advice about this delicate subject from one of the moderators,i mowed this subject here,with more facts.I was recently outraged when i heard someting,affter a discusion with my proffesor of history,but not by her,but becouse of the stance of some states to modify history.For example,in my country,there was durring WW2 a civil war betwen two sides-Partisans and Chetnics.Since Partisans won,there were a lot effort to demonise the loosers.They displayed them in culture and litteratura like they are nazi colaborators,slayer of the people etc...But,since the thruth is judged to get into the daylight,on surface rised some facts.For example,when Partisans knew that killing some german would activate a retaliation by them.In villages where most were Chetniks,partisans would shot some german,who is allmost lowest rank,knowing the price.There are also a lot of cases in here,particulary in history books of modern era,where nothing isn't changed.We still learn that Partisan were the perfect liberators,and Chetnik non human demon.There is also examplle in Turkey,where they dont learn(and also deni) the Armenian genocide during WW1,and also they learn that Ottoman empire was happy little comunity,where everyone had rights,and that some crazy countries rebbeled against them(i will take examplle of serbia,bulgaria,montenegro,grece,armenia etc...).Neither to say,in thouse books there is no mentions of they metods of torchure and interogating the people under they reign,i saw jannisary reference-but there it writh that thouse were volontary christian warriors in service of the Empire.Do you know more examplle of history modification and what is your oppinion and additude about it?




Reply With Quote






