Playing campaign on easy?

**johnny_b_good** · January 05, 2011, 04:00 AM

Is it challenging to play campgaign map difficult on easy?Im pretty annoyed on medium because of spawning enemies all the time.Whats the situation on easy?

**Lil Jazzer** · January 05, 2011, 04:38 AM

I suggest you play on Hard/Hard the stray units on medium consiting of 5 or 6, conglomerate to what is a full army (14 units). It is a good campaign/ strategic challenge!

**General Brittanicus** · January 05, 2011, 05:38 AM

If your talking about the spawning armies that appear when you take certain cities they will still spawn on easy, so you may as well play medium or hard difficulty.

**Brusilov** · January 05, 2011, 12:41 PM

I would imagine on the easy setting that you would have more money and the AI have less money to raise armies. However, I doubt that this will stop the AI from spamming numerous armies.

I don't think anyone beta tested on the easy setting (we were told to use higher settings).

**tone** · January 05, 2011, 12:47 PM

If you're getting too many battles you can always try the fewer battles mod.

**bigmilt16** · January 05, 2011, 12:53 PM

Originally Posted by tone

If you're getting too many battles you can always try the fewer battles mod.

Didn't know that was still compatible for 2.1a. Gotta check that out!

**johnny_b_good** · January 06, 2011, 04:01 AM

Originally Posted by tone

If you're getting too many battles you can always try the fewer battles mod.

Yes I want that,less battles

but didnt here for this ''mod''?Is this mod or submod for rs2??

**Brusilov** · January 06, 2011, 05:23 AM

Originally Posted by johnny_b_good

Yes I want that,less battles

but didnt here for this ''mod''?Is this mod or submod for rs2??

I'm quite sure that dvk901 included the sub-mod in the '_IMPORTANT_STUFF' folder for the patches.

**Cal** · January 05, 2011, 01:28 PM

i play on the hardest difficulty cus i love the challange

! so i recomend using the hardest difficulty for the most fun!

**AntigonosDoson** · January 05, 2011, 05:25 PM

Originally Posted by Cal

i play on the hardest difficulty cus i love the challange

! so i recomend using the hardest difficulty for the most fun!

Play 1 turn recruitment. That's how RTW was meant to be played

**Striker** · January 05, 2011, 05:46 PM

Originally Posted by bigmilt16

Didn't know that was still compatible for 2.1a. Gotta check that out!

I think the file is in the IMPORTANT_STUFF folder or something like that

Originally Posted by AntigonosDoson

Play 1 turn recruitment. That's how RTW was meant to be played

RSII not............

**Cal** · January 05, 2011, 06:16 PM

Originally Posted by AntigonosDoson

Play 1 turn recruitment. That's how RTW was meant to be played

i never realy liked one turn just cus i read somewhere that 0-turn was more historicaly accurate? saying that all the stacks have led to alot of losses due to auto resolves :L

**Tilorius Coilean Hibernus** · January 06, 2011, 11:12 PM

Originally Posted by Cal

i never realy liked one turn just cus i read somewhere that 0-turn was more historicaly accurate?

It is, and it isn't. It didn't take 20 years to train a legion, it took a few months, so in that respect 0-turn is more accurate. OTOH it didn't take 50-100 battles (or more, in some cases) for wars to be resolved. In that respect it is not as accurate. It's a trade-off. 1-turn players seem to prefer the relative importance of individual battles (I agree that it's a little annoying to work so hard for a heroic victory when it has so little impact on the overall course of the war), 0-turn players seem to prefer the ability to quickly raise armies.

**chris10** · January 07, 2011, 03:45 AM

Originally Posted by Tilorius Coilean Hibernus

It is, and it isn't. It didn't take 20 years to train a legion, it took a few months, so in that respect 0-turn is more accurate.

these comparisons are not valuable as the engine has been designed to work for 1Turn.
Additionally when people are talking about realism they totally ignore that these concepts (training legion,population numbers etc) are not meant as a reflection of reality but an abstract simulation of the entire process or system fitted into the game .

So people find it realistic that they can train 9 units in 1Turn but they dont find it unrealistic that their units live forever and never die because of age.
As well people dont bother about recruiting the entire population of a Settlement...Men,Woman,Children,Old...the maximum recruitable population is maybe 25% counting all males in military age.So realism is only recalled when it fits the purpose.
0Turn is a weird concept and destroys the strategy part of the game but its as well a mirror of an "everything instantly and now" mentality which spreads since about 10 years especially in the western world.

The entire 0Turn argumentation is very weak...realism has nothing to do with it...
Recruiting 1 unit per Turn and per Settlement has to be seen in relation with
1. the unit lives forever
and
2. In relation of the overall game time

In M2TW it was 3 untis per Turn. That was because the overall gametime of the vanilla campaign has been greatly reduced to a lot less turns than in RTW. It was 250turns if I remember correctly.
After all there is a reason why there is no 0Turn TW game and never will be.