Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 84

Thread: Why muslims underachieve?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Why muslims underachieve?

    I found this site article on the Web; I wonder
    if their is much truth in this.



    2005/11/24 by Thierry Gattuso

    Muslims make up 22% of the World’s population, according to the United Nations' Arab Human Development Report: "Half of Arab women cannot read; One in five Arabs live on less than $2 per day; Only 1 percent of the Arab population has a personal computer, and only half of 1 percent use the Internet; Fifteen percent of the Arab workforce is unemployed; 60% of Muslims are illiterate”. Only two Muslims have won the Nobel prize in a scientific field - Dr. Abdus Salam, in 1979 for Physics and Dr. Ahmed Zewail, in 1992 for Chemistry. Dr Salam a native of Pakistan , is not considered to be a Muslim in his home country as he follows the Ahmadiyyas sect of Islam.

    Only 600 universities service a Muslim population of 1.2 billion in 57 countries. Half the universities concentrate on teaching Islamic education and science. India has 8,407 universities for 1 billion people and the United States has 5,758 for 280 million people. The combined annual GDP (purchasing power parity basis) of the 57 Muslim countries is under $2 trillion. The US produces goods and services worth $10.4 trillion; China $5.7 trillion, Japan $3.5 trillion, India $3 trillion and Germany $2.1 trillion. The oil rich states Saudi Arabia , United Arab Emirates , Kuwait and Qatar collectively produce goods and services worth $430 billion; Thailand alone produces goods and services worth $429 billion.

    Underachievement by Muslims was not always the case claim Muslims and point to a glorious and illustrious time when the Arab Muslim empire was the most advanced and enlightened in the world. Many discoveries were made in the period 750 – 1250 AD according to Muslims. Critical analysis of this period shows that many of the advancements and discoveries we falsely attribute to Muslims were actually made by the ancient civilisations of the Mediterranean area, or by the ancient Chinese and Indian civilisations.

    Muslims believe, that glass mirrors, were first developed by Muslim Spain in the 11th century. Around 1290 Venetians learned how to produce glass from the Spanish Muslims. The Romans invented the glass mirror around the 1st century. Research by Reinuad and Fave, indicates that Muslims chemists were the first to develop the formula for gunpowder and later produced firearms. The Chinese knew the formula for gunpowder and used it for military purposes during the Sung dynasty of the 12th century. Muslims boast that they laid the foundations for modern mathematics and two of its main branches, geometry and trigonometry. The Muslim contribution was merely to collect and combine the work done by the Egyptians, Greeks, Indians, Persians and Romans. The Indian civilisation gave us the concept of zero and modern numbers. Brahmagupta, an Indian mathematician, (598 – 665 AD) can be accredited with the initial work on algebra and negative numbers. The trigonometry terms sine and cosine have there origin in Sanskrit, the ancient language of India .

    The underachievement and underperformance by Muslims is acute in the 57 Islamic countries. Muslims claim that they are recovering from a long period of colonisation and de colonisation and the effects of the removal of the Palestinian people from Arab lands. How about the achievements of Muslims who live and work in the West? Well the truth is not that much better than their cousins in Muslim countries.

    The United Kingdom census of 2001 for the first time looked at the nation’s religious background. The findings showed that Muslims make up 2.8% of the UK population. Hindus 1%, Sikhs 0.6, Buddhists and Jews both make up 0.5% of the UK population. 31% of Muslims of working age have no qualifications, the highest of any religious group. As in many countries owing your own home is a major achievement and financial responsibility. 82% of Sikhs followed by 78% of Jews own their own home in the UK . Only 52% of Muslims own their own home, the lowest of any religious group. 14% of Muslims are unemployed, compared to 8% of Sikhs and 6% of Hindus. The underachievement of Muslims is even more bleak when you examine where most Muslims, Hindus, Sikhs and Buddhist in the UK come from. 75% of Muslims, 97% of Hindus, 98 % of Sikhs and 69% of Buddhists in the UK are from or have ancestral links to South Asia . Therefore any cultural factors can be largely ruled out when comparing the achievement of Muslims with people from other religious groups. Muslims complain that they have to overcome language difficulties and face discrimination in the UK and state this as a factor in there poor performance. Buddhists, Hindus and Sikhs face the same language and discrimination issues as Muslims, yet their achievements and performance is much better than Muslims.



    References

    United Nations' Arab Human Development Report 2002

    United Nations' Arab Human Development Report 2003

    World Book Encyclopaedia

    Encyclopaedia Britannica

    Chronology of Science and Discovery Isaac Asimov's

    http://www.statistics.gov.uk/focuson/religion/
    Last edited by TIGERCAT; January 12, 2006 at 04:46 PM.

  2. #2
    Senator
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Jacksonville, Florida.
    Posts
    1,290

    Default

    And yet somehow people still don't see this, argue about how peaceful Muslims are, and still claim all of those achievments as the Muslim's doing. You can't destroy the truth, but you can hide from it.

    "Where is the horse and his rider? Where is the horn that was blowing? They have passed like rain on the mountains"

    There are two things in life about which we should never grumble: the first, that which we cannot change; and second, that which we can change.

  3. #3
    Darth Wong's Avatar Pit Bull
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario
    Posts
    4,020

    Default

    Pure tripe. If Islam is more intrinsically hostile to progress than any other religion, then why did Christian Europe not start progressing forward until the Enlightenment era, when secularism began to rise?

    Muslims need the same thing that Christians needed a half-millennium ago: a watering-down of their faith. Religion is like alcohol: if you must do it, do it in moderation. You will find that the most devout, fanatical Christian groups in the US are also the least educated. The problem is not the choice of religion; it is the fanaticism.

    As for the true nature of the Koran, the Bible and Torah don't fare any better when subjected to serious academic scrutiny. All three of these documents are nothing more than the hallucinatory ramblings of ignorant savage primitives. In many cases they even admit as much, by describing how they went on long fasts before having their "visions"; modern medical science has already told us what happens when you deprive yourself of food and water and then wander around in the desert for days.

    Yes, I have a life outside the Internet and Rome Total War
    "Oedipus ruined a great sex life by asking too many questions" - Stephen Colbert
    Under the kind patronage of Seleukos

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Wong
    You will find that the most devout, fanatical Christian groups in the US are also the least educated. The problem is not the choice of religion; it is the fanaticism..
    You shouldn't ridicule the American south, Idaho,
    Montana, and Applachia with their snake cults, in that
    manner. It might hurt their feelings. LOL (sarcasim)

    Kanaric:
    I guess only christians and rural whites can ever be
    taken to task, all others are off limits?
    I WASN'T even thinking about Blacks in Philadelphia,
    by the way, remember 70% of Jews vote democrat and so do
    the Irish unionists. Phila does have many whites their too.
    I guess every small thing turns into racism, sexism etc.

    p.s. I was thinking of a friend of mine (Irish -catholic) who
    would vote for the devil if he was a democrat and he isn't
    too informed on politics as well as his family. He still
    thinks Ted Kennedy is a great moral man.
    Last edited by TIGERCAT; January 12, 2006 at 05:22 PM.

  5. #5

    Default

    They left behind in every case. Economics, science, culture development more and more. I'm a Muslim and a Turkish my points are simply:

    1- Educational: We couldn't develop "science" researching, processing and developing structures. Religional based dogmatic and outdated school system mutilated whole society. We failed to see power of positive sciences.

    2- Global: We failed to think importance of geographic discoveries. We've isolated ourselves in our borders except new conquerings or wars. Limited touches with another part of world were only war, small diplomatic missions.

    3- Society: We put our womens behind doors of houses and failed to include them social life. We cut half of body to death. Basic education and non qulification made them only housekeepers or babysitters.

    4- Govermental: Sultan was shadow of god itself. So holly and untouchable. We couldn't develop a parlamental structure or break Monarchs solid power. The result was only a simple mass without any purpose or idea about future. "Sultan wills well" yeah but not so much longer. We couldn't create any Cromwell or Napoleon coz that demigod regime was a unpassable barrier for them.

    I may continue forward...

  6. #6
    Denny Crane!'s Avatar Comes Rei Militaris
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Newcastle, England
    Posts
    24,462

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Little Legionaire
    They left behind in every case. Economics, science, culture development more and more. I'm a Muslim and a Turkish my points are simply:

    1- Educational: We couldn't develop "science" researching, processing and developing structures. Religional based dogmatic and outdated school system mutilated whole society. We failed to see power of positive sciences.

    2- Global: We failed to think importance of geographic discoveries. We've isolated ourselves in our borders except new conquerings or wars. Limited touches with another part of world were only war, small diplomatic missions.

    3- Society: We put our womens behind doors of houses and failed to include them social life. We cut half of body to death. Basic education and non qulification made them only housekeepers or babysitters.

    4- Govermental: Sultan was shadow of god itself. So holly and untouchable. We couldn't develop a parlamental structure or break Monarchs solid power. The result was only a simple mass without any purpose or idea about future. "Sultan wills well" yeah but not so much longer. We couldn't create any Cromwell or Napoleon coz that demigod regime was a unpassable barrier for them.

    I may continue forward...
    Right congratulatons on a good summary of some reasons why the countries have suffered, but in terms of the arguement at hand how are these countries any different to African christian/other religous countries or South American countries or non muslim asian and indonesian countries.

    And if you look at the trend in Britain we are suffering a serious shortage of skilled academic and manually skilled workers which suggests something seriously wrong with the country, in fact maybe that is why everytime I make one of my frequent trips to hospital I always end up getting to see a (smoking hot) Indian doctor, because we don't have enough.

    So lets change the topic to Why do secular/Christian/non specific religous/landlocked/oil rich/indonesian/South American/Disenfranchised youths of consumer driven materialistic societies /Hindu/Buddhist/Fijian/Chinese people underacheive?

    Peter
    Last edited by Denny Crane!; January 12, 2006 at 04:14 PM.

  7. #7

    Default

    Liberals vs. extremists.

    So, who is right? Most of the posts here are facts researched from one or the other of the peoples that I said above. You won't get a right or wrong answer, you'll just spit drivel at each other until one backs down. Personally, you cant be too harsh or too lenient on Muslims. They are a part of the world, and they deserve the same respect as any other people.

  8. #8
    Ummon's Avatar Indefinitely Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    19,146

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Wong
    Pure tripe. If Islam is more intrinsically hostile to progress than any other religion, then why did Christian Europe not start progressing forward until the Enlightenment era, when secularism began to rise?
    Actually, European progress started to innovate compared with past knowledge from the renaissance onwards. Furthermore, the fall of the mediterranean-spanning Roman civilization, with population being reduced to one tenth its normal levels under the Romans, end of non-regional trade, and destruction of most of the infrastructure, widespread brigandage, etc. were some of the reasons.

  9. #9
    Civitate
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Nottingham, England
    Posts
    2,727

    Default

    Actually, European progress started to innovate compared with past knowledge from the renaissance onwards.
    Which coincided with the rise of secularism....

    Furthermore, the fall of the mediterranean-spanning Roman civilization, with population being reduced to one tenth its normal levels under the Romans, end of non-regional trade, and destruction of most of the infrastructure, widespread brigandage, etc. were some of the reasons.
    Don't understand what you mean by this. That Europe regressed because of the fall of a technologically advanced central authority that made advances in technology without being overly secular?
    Under patronage of: Wilpuri

  10. #10
    Ummon's Avatar Indefinitely Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    19,146

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KingOfTheIsles
    Which coincided with the rise of secularism....
    Absolutely not.

    Quote Originally Posted by KingOfTheIsles
    Don't understand what you mean by this. That Europe regressed because of the fall of a technologically advanced central authority that made advances in technology without being overly secular?
    Perhaps that europe regressed and was stopped in cultural and scientific advancement by a prolonged lack of all items which make such advancement possible?

  11. #11
    Valentin the II's Avatar Primicerius
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ashkelon, Israel
    Posts
    3,944

    Default

    Bigfutedfred, what the hell is it with you!?
    You make absolutly no sens!
    I just made a fine example of Israelys and muslims (the druzs) living peasfuly together.
    So obviously its not Israel who started the blood war but the palectinians.
    And they are the ones who should end it.
    Becaws we can live in peace and harmony with other nations, but the palectinians canot.
    They should realy change their rotten atitued fast.
    Befour I become prazident and WIPE THEM OUT! (that was a joke)
    Changing back to topic: The muslims do not underachiev becaws of beeng muslims.
    But becaws they are mislead by theyr ******ing stupid leaders and their "propoganda".
    Thats all I have to say.

    -Valik
    Born to be wild - live to outgrow it (Lao Tzu)
    Someday you will die and somehow something's going to steal your carbon
    In contrast to the efforts of tiny Israel to make contributions to the world so as to better mankind, one has to ask what have those who have strived to eliminate Israel from the face of the earth done other than to create hate and bloodshed.

  12. #12
    TW Bigfoot
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    EARTH
    Posts
    6,040

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Valentin the II
    Bigfutedfred, what the hell is it with you!?
    You make absolutly no sens!
    I just made a fine example of Israelys and muslims (the druzs) living peasfuly together.
    So obviously its not Israel who started the blood war but the palectinians.
    And they are the ones who should end it.
    How should they do that?
    Is every palestinian a member of hamas?

    Again you are judging an entire people on the actions of an illegal group....

  13. #13

    Default

    Second edit: I just found out that 3/4 of this entire thread is OT. I'm closing this, period. If you want to discuss about Israel or something else, make a new thread.
    Last edited by Torment; January 15, 2006 at 03:26 PM.

  14. #14

    Default

    You can not say only Muslims underachieve. Not only Muslims live in that country, or area. There are others as well and they as well can not read or write, or just as much as all of the other people around them.

    MasterAdnin

  15. #15

    Default

    Because muslims in their homelands had it easy.
    Nice warm climate, plenty to eat, limitted war over the years.
    Right now, A good 10% of my school are muslims (strangely enough all Bengalis) with a negligible muslim population in NYC





  16. #16

    Default

    To suggest that belonging to a certain religion is the cause of 'underachievement' is clearly rubbish.

  17. #17
    wilpuri's Avatar It Gets Worse.
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    The Weimar Republic
    Posts
    9,512

    Default

    I do believe, that some cultures do create a more fertile soil for innovation, progress etc. But that's me.
    The common culture of a tribe is a sign of its inner cohesion. But tribes are vanishing from the modern world, as are all forms of traditional society. Customs, practices, festivals, rituals and beliefs have acquired a flut and half-hearted quality which reflects our nomadic and rootless existence, predicated as we are on the global air-waves.

    ROGER SCRUTON, Modern Culture

  18. #18

    Default

    But culture is not the same as religion at all.

  19. #19
    Scar Face's Avatar Indefinitely Banned
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Oshawa, Ont, Canada
    Posts
    5,147

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Masquerade
    But culture is not the same as religion at all.
    Acctually it is. Very much so up until modern times where people take religion alot less seriously. 150 years ago (victorian age) people wouldn't do **** without the preist's approval of there religion. If they said science or overthrowing a bad dictator was bad 98% of the time they would agree and stick with it. So ya culture is largely defined by Relgion and how the important relgious figures interprete(sp?) there religion.

  20. #20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Scar_Face
    Acctually it is. Very much so up until modern times where people take religion alot less seriously. 150 years ago (victorian age) people wouldn't do **** without the preist's approval of there religion. If they said science or overthrowing a bad dictator was bad 98% of the time they would agree and stick with it. So ya culture is largely defined by Relgion and how the important relgious figures interprete(sp?) there religion.

    That is so blatently wrong. Examples pop into my head immediately to the contrary. Ancient Greek and Roman philosophers debating if the ancient pantheon existed, constantly challenging accepted views of the world. Dramatic shifts in state religion such as the conversion of Constantine or the abandoning of Catholicism by the English in favour of Protestantism. Galileo Galilei confronting the inquisition.

    Even if you were right (and you are not) 150 years is a **** load of time. Religion does not equal culture.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •