What is an islamist? How is an islamist different from being a muslim ?
What is an islamist? How is an islamist different from being a muslim ?
Simply put, an Islamist is someone who ascribes themselves to Islamism, the belief that Islam should be spread around the world and non-Muslims should be suppressed.
A new mobile phone tower went up in a town in the USA, and the local newspaper asked a number of people what they thought of it. Some said they noticed their cellphone reception was better. Some said they noticed the tower was affecting their health.
A local administrator was asked to comment. He nodded sagely, and said simply: "Wow. And think about how much more pronounced these effects will be once the tower is actually operational."
Last edited by squirel; November 30, 2010 at 12:37 PM.
Muslims who do not support the notion that Islam should be spread around the world aren't Islamists. Islamism is the a form of fundamental Islam that adheres strict following of the Qu'ran word for word, and therefore supports world-wide domination by Muslims.Ok. So a muslim do not support Islam being spread around the world ? Or it is it the two combined (Islam being spread + non-muslims being suppressed) that makes someone being an islamist ?
The Qu'ranI also wonder, where does Islamism come from ?
Incorrect.
That is what a radical Islamist would advocate but Islamism itself simply relates to the ideology that Islam is not just a religious belief but also a political system.
Anyway, I think this should go off to the Academy due to the political nature of Islamism.
Patron to Lord Mov, Azog 150, JaM, Lord William, Grouchy13
"For what it’s worth: it’s never too late to be whoever you want to be. I hope you live a life you’re proud of, and if you find that you’re not, I hope you have the strength to start all over again."
I knew someone would say that. Technically speaking that is a more accurate definition of what it actually entails, but the simple definition is simply Islamic militancy. If you want to take that up with the Professors of the English Language at Oxford University you are more than welcome.
Last edited by Copperknickers II; November 30, 2010 at 01:07 PM.
A new mobile phone tower went up in a town in the USA, and the local newspaper asked a number of people what they thought of it. Some said they noticed their cellphone reception was better. Some said they noticed the tower was affecting their health.
A local administrator was asked to comment. He nodded sagely, and said simply: "Wow. And think about how much more pronounced these effects will be once the tower is actually operational."
That's not all that helpful to the OP then, is it?
You're very much right, but I'd like to emphasise that different Islamists believe in different things.
For example, islamism can be an individual belief that a person is doing good deeds by displaying public piety through things like prayer, dress, and charity. (What is a 'good deed' or 'public piety' also varies among islamists. It is by no means a definite or centralized movement, most of the time you cannot even call it a movement at all)
An islamist does not necessarily believe that the state or laws must be involved. They just believe that Islam itself must be involved.
"Live a good life. If there are gods and they are just, then they will not care how devout you have been, but will welcome you based on the virtues you have lived by. If there are gods, but unjust, then you should not want to worship them. If there are no gods, then you will be gone, but will have lived a noble life that will live on in the memories of your loved ones."
- Marcus Aurelius, Roman Emperor from 161 AD to 180 AD
well Islamism is a reaction to western secularism
No I'm not Wrong, if you're going to be condescending at least make sure you are actually in the right first.
As I have already said my definition comes from the Oxford English Dictionary, it has nothing to do with what Muslims think it means because we are arguing about English here, a non-Muslim language unlike Urdu or Arabic. I doubt Islamists call themselves Islamists, since it is an exonym which has no bearing on what they themselves believe.
Last edited by Copperknickers II; December 01, 2010 at 03:29 PM.
A new mobile phone tower went up in a town in the USA, and the local newspaper asked a number of people what they thought of it. Some said they noticed their cellphone reception was better. Some said they noticed the tower was affecting their health.
A local administrator was asked to comment. He nodded sagely, and said simply: "Wow. And think about how much more pronounced these effects will be once the tower is actually operational."
Copperknickers summarised it pretty well, you could have simply googled (or wiki'd) it but opening a thread works too.
A member of the Most Ancient, Puissant and Honourable Society of Silly Old Duffers
Secret Sig Content Box!
That's what an islamist looks like.
Hammer & Sickle - Karacharovo
And I drank it strait down.
Sarcasm fail.
Granted Lettre de Marque by King Henry V - Spurs given by imb39
Сканија је Данска
عیسی پسر مریم گفت :' جهان است پل ، عبور بیش از آن است ، اما هیچ ساخت خانه بر آن او امیدوار است که برای یک روز ، ممکن است برای ابدیت امیدواریم ، اما ماندگار جهان اما ساعت آن را صرف در دعا و نماز برای استراحت است نهان
All of the Balkans is not worth the bones of a single Pomeranian grenadier.
Otto von Bismarck
How does that bait taste?
"Therefore I am not in favour of raising any dogmatic banner. On the contrary, we must try to help the dogmatists to clarify their propositions for themselves. Thus, communism, in particular, is a dogmatic abstraction; in which connection, however, I am not thinking of some imaginary and possible communism, but actually existing communism as taught by Cabet, Dézamy, Weitling, etc. This communism is itself only a special expression of the humanistic principle, an expression which is still infected by its antithesis – the private system. Hence the abolition of private property and communism are by no means identical, and it is not accidental but inevitable that communism has seen other socialist doctrines – such as those of Fourier, Proudhon, etc. – arising to confront it because it is itself only a special, one-sided realisation of the socialist principle."
Marx to A.Ruge